{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C022","selector_replication":2,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":78,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":72,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":85,"deployability_complexity":65,"authority_safety_reversibility":90,"strict_potential":75,"empirical_partner_potential":89,"scrutiny_priority":83,"biggest_visible_risk":"The patterned surface may retain, contaminate, or alter the newly nucleated seeds, making clean seed release and genuine facilitator reuse chemically infeasible.","rationale":"The proposal isolates a consequential nucleation barrier and makes physical retention, turnover, regeneration, mass balance, selectivity, and downstream acceptance necessary to the claim. Its matched batch and inert-cartridge controls can decisively distinguish surface activity from flow or mixing effects. The bench probe is bounded and reversible, although fabricating a stable interface that nucleates seeds yet releases them cleanly is a substantial technical dependency."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":81,"causal_archetype_fit":77,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":43,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":88,"adopter_partner_path":94,"deployability_complexity":86,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":52,"empirical_partner_potential":92,"scrutiny_priority":75,"biggest_visible_risk":"The intervention may reduce to a familiar jointly governed intake, checklist, and specialist-coordination service without a durable contrastive mechanism.","rationale":"The recurring handoff burden is credible, the participating authorities are identifiable, and a six-case pilot could measure total effort, errors, rerouting, custody, and downstream effects with little irreversible risk. Its main weakness is distinctiveness: most components resemble standard service design, and the claimed reusable relational facilitator may still require nearly proportional specialist work for every case."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":84,"causal_archetype_fit":84,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":49,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":95,"deployability_complexity":89,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":66,"empirical_partner_potential":96,"scrutiny_priority":81,"biggest_visible_risk":"The compiler may be indistinguishable in substance from existing recipe automation, process libraries, design-rule checking, and proximity-correction workflows.","rationale":"This is the clearest partner study: shadow mode, independent release, witness coupons, deliberate ineligible cases, and a calibration-change test can resolve both performance and regeneration uncertainty without exposing production samples. The bottleneck and decision authority are concrete. Scrutiny is chiefly needed to determine whether a meaningful contrastive claim survives beyond standard lithography workflow automation and whether hidden case-specific engineering eliminates reuse."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":86,"causal_archetype_fit":90,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":66,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":97,"adopter_partner_path":91,"deployability_complexity":76,"authority_safety_reversibility":92,"strict_potential":81,"empirical_partner_potential":94,"scrutiny_priority":89,"biggest_visible_risk":"Apparent deagglomeration may actually result from selective retention, fragmentation, coating loss, or transient separation rather than a qualifying stable dispersion.","rationale":"The preparation problem is consequential because it can confound downstream characterization and toxicology results. The retained transducer, controlled feed envelope, sham-cell comparison, current-protocol control, full mass balance, integrity assays, stability window, and repeated cleaning checks tightly connect the archetype to a falsifiable physical mechanism. The first study is authorized, contained, and reversible, while the central uncertainty can be resolved directly by a capable laboratory partner."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_B"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_D","portfolio_observation":"The physical interventions offer stronger archetype-essential contrastive claims but carry harder material and device uncertainties; the informational and service interventions are easier and safer to test with partners but are more visibly vulnerable to collapsing into familiar automation or coordination practice. Candidate D best balances a consequential problem, mechanism-specific controls, bounded deployment, and partner-resolvable uncertainty.","confidence":"MODERATE"}