{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C022","selector_replication":3,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":73,"causal_archetype_fit":86,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":68,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":76,"deployability_complexity":43,"authority_safety_reversibility":88,"strict_potential":72,"empirical_partner_potential":79,"scrutiny_priority":74,"biggest_visible_risk":"The proposed patterned surface may shed, foul, or act as a consumed seed source, defeating the claimed reusable nucleation mechanism.","rationale":"The nucleation-variability problem is consequential and the retained-interface mechanism is causally central, with excellent matched controls, mass-balance logic, regeneration checks, and halt rules. However, building a selective surface that releases acceptable seeds across repeated cycles is scientifically and operationally demanding, and the proposal may collapse into heterogeneous nucleation, consumable seeding, or mixing effects already represented by its controls."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":81,"causal_archetype_fit":70,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":46,"operational_specificity":88,"falsifiability_test_quality":84,"adopter_partner_path":92,"deployability_complexity":74,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":62,"empirical_partner_potential":90,"scrutiny_priority":76,"biggest_visible_risk":"The standing service may be ordinary governed intake coordination whose benefits do not require the reusable-facilitator archetype.","rationale":"Repeated nano–bio handoff friction is credible, important, measurable, and especially well suited to a bounded partner pilot with independent acceptance and rollback. The proposal specifies eligibility, custody, workload, appeals, exceptions, and downstream effects unusually well. Its main weakness is contrastive resilience: broker services, templates, checklists, and embedded coordinators are close rivals, while specialist effort may still scale roughly with every case."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":84,"causal_archetype_fit":91,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":73,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":96,"adopter_partner_path":82,"deployability_complexity":59,"authority_safety_reversibility":91,"strict_potential":84,"empirical_partner_potential":87,"scrutiny_priority":88,"biggest_visible_risk":"Apparent deagglomeration may actually result from selective particle retention, fragmentation, or transient separation followed by rapid reaggregation.","rationale":"This proposal ties a concrete preparation problem to a physically retained facilitator and makes selectivity, mass balance, particle integrity, stability, regeneration, and multi-cycle turnover decisive. Untreated, sham-cell, and current-protocol split controls can distinguish the mechanism and change a deployment decision. The probe is contained and reversible, although acoustic treatment, microfluidic dispersion, and sonication-like rivals make prior-art scrutiny important and device cleaning may limit practical turnover."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":83,"causal_archetype_fit":82,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":52,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":93,"adopter_partner_path":94,"deployability_complexity":81,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":76,"empirical_partner_potential":95,"scrutiny_priority":86,"biggest_visible_risk":"The compiler may be a familiar process-automation system whose apparent reuse depends on hidden per-design engineering and calibration work.","rationale":"The workflow bottleneck is credible, the intervention has clear authority, objective eligibility, shadow-mode testing, witness coupons, independent release, and an unusually strong calibration-drift test. It is highly attractive for an empirical facility partnership and comparatively deployable. Strict potential is tempered by close resemblance to established rule-based recipe generation, design-rule checking, proximity-correction, and workflow automation, so a meaningful residual contrastive claim may be narrow."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_A"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_C","portfolio_observation":"C and D warrant first scrutiny for complementary reasons: C offers the strongest strict mechanistic test, while D offers the clearest low-risk partner study. B is a strong partner pilot but looks more vulnerable to ordinary coordination-service prior art; A is rigorously testable yet carries the greatest scientific and deployment burden.","confidence":"MODERATE"}