{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C023","selector_replication":1,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":76,"causal_archetype_fit":79,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":51,"operational_specificity":84,"falsifiability_test_quality":82,"adopter_partner_path":85,"deployability_complexity":60,"authority_safety_reversibility":91,"strict_potential":70,"empirical_partner_potential":84,"scrutiny_priority":75,"biggest_visible_risk":"The gateway may mostly formalize existing librarian, ethics, and community-consultation practices while shifting scarce relational labor into a new service layer.","rationale":"The proposal identifies observable duplication and offers unusually clear eligibility, authority, workload, rollback, and matched-pilot rules. Its strongest lane is partner testing because the department and archive can directly measure burden and errors. Strict potential is reduced by reliance on numerous specialists and representatives and by the possibility that context work is irreducibly case-specific."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":86,"causal_archetype_fit":86,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":57,"operational_specificity":90,"falsifiability_test_quality":89,"adopter_partner_path":87,"deployability_complexity":67,"authority_safety_reversibility":90,"strict_potential":79,"empirical_partner_potential":90,"scrutiny_priority":83,"biggest_visible_risk":"A reusable annotation grammar could impose artificial boundaries and apparent comparability on records whose meaningful segmentation depends on local interpretation.","rationale":"Repeated transcription, alignment, segmentation, and reconciliation are concrete bottlenecks, and the bench combines mechanical reuse with explicit layer separation and bounded specialist adjudication. The matched-excerpt pilot has decision-relevant quality, labor, authorization, and recovery measures. Prior-art vulnerability and the difficulty of validating cross-context segmentation temper the otherwise strong case."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":88,"causal_archetype_fit":91,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":61,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":86,"deployability_complexity":78,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":87,"empirical_partner_potential":89,"scrutiny_priority":89,"biggest_visible_risk":"The module may encode a contested calendar reconstruction as infrastructure, producing auditable but still systematically wrong or falsely bounded conversions.","rationale":"This is the clearest bounded transformation: declared inputs and cofactors enter scoped modules, while outputs preserve alternatives, sensitivities, provenance, and uncertainty. Compatibility screening, module retirement, matched manual comparisons, and independent review make the causal claim sharply falsifiable. The service is comparatively deployable, though scrutiny must determine whether its contribution exceeds existing conversion tools and expert workflows."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":66,"causal_archetype_fit":70,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":56,"operational_specificity":78,"falsifiability_test_quality":75,"adopter_partner_path":74,"deployability_complexity":47,"authority_safety_reversibility":87,"strict_potential":55,"empirical_partner_potential":73,"scrutiny_priority":61,"biggest_visible_risk":"The proposition graph may reify one curator's contested doctrinal system, making useful consequences and errors difficult to distinguish independently of substantive theological judgment.","rationale":"The claim-card boundary, non-authoritative outputs, and voluntary journal or workshop pilot are concrete and reversible. However, building and validating a tradition-period graph is a large research dependency, while the alleged recurring bottleneck is less firmly observable than in the other proposals. False paths, omissions, and curator framing could consume reviewer effort without a stable external quality criterion."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_D"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_C","portfolio_observation":"C and B offer the strongest bounded computational transformations and cleanest matched tests. A is a strong institutional-partner study but may primarily reorganize consultation labor. D has a plausible pilot venue yet depends most heavily on contestable knowledge representation and difficult-to-validate curation.","confidence":"HIGH"}