{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C024","selector_replication":3,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":90,"causal_archetype_fit":86,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":66,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":90,"adopter_partner_path":82,"deployability_complexity":61,"authority_safety_reversibility":91,"strict_potential":78,"empirical_partner_potential":84,"scrutiny_priority":81,"biggest_visible_risk":"The gateway may convert a high-stakes, context-dependent consent and relationship problem into a deceptively authoritative structured map, with specialist and accessibility labor becoming the real case-proportional intervention.","rationale":"The burden and potential harms are consequential, and the proposal carefully separates practical roles, information permission, and legal authority. Its bounded shadow probe, explicit rerouting, and rollback rules are strong. Scrutiny should test whether a sufficiently large routine case class exists, whether the map actually reduces total handoff work, and whether the concept remains distinct from record redesign, navigation, and structured consent workflows."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":84,"causal_archetype_fit":94,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":62,"operational_specificity":96,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":91,"deployability_complexity":82,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":88,"empirical_partner_potential":91,"scrutiny_priority":90,"biggest_visible_risk":"The proposed workbench may prove to be a well-governed combination of familiar repository ingest, digital-preservation, metadata, and disclosure-control practices rather than a meaningful contrastive intervention.","rationale":"This is the cleanest repeated transformation: authorized collections enter, auditable technical and documentary operations occur, exceptions leave the pathway, and independent repository review remains intact. Previously accepted deposits provide a credible, bounded comparison set with decision-relevant failure thresholds. Its main scrutiny question is distinctiveness, not feasibility or testability."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":80,"causal_archetype_fit":80,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":53,"operational_specificity":86,"falsifiability_test_quality":80,"adopter_partner_path":77,"deployability_complexity":64,"authority_safety_reversibility":88,"strict_potential":69,"empirical_partner_potential":80,"scrutiny_priority":73,"biggest_visible_risk":"The reusable liaison may become an ordinary community-engagement office or influential gatekeeper, while the decisive trust and authority work remains case-specific and cannot be validated through retrospective shadow timing.","rationale":"The proposal recognizes real coordination burdens and sharply preserves ethics, community, and individual authority. However, the causal facilitator depends on maintained relationships, legitimate representation, and contextual trust—the very factors least amenable to a standardized reusable circuit. A partner could test it, but the proposed shadow exercise cannot establish live legitimacy, burden transfer, or effects on deliberation."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":78,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":57,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":97,"adopter_partner_path":94,"deployability_complexity":89,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":85,"empirical_partner_potential":94,"scrutiny_priority":89,"biggest_visible_risk":"Anchor packets and discrepancy profiling may merely formalize familiar coder training and calibration while rewarding answer learning, false consensus, or contextual flattening.","rationale":"The intervention is exceptionally bounded, reversible, and easy for an authorized study team to assay, including a distinct transfer packet that can expose memorization and false readiness. The reusable-circuit mapping is strong and downstream live-coding performance can change the adoption decision. It trails the archival workbench narrowly because the core practice looks especially vulnerable to familiar calibration and codebook-training precedents."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_C"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_B","portfolio_observation":"B and D offer the strongest scrutiny targets because they define repeatable transformations, accessible partner-owned evidence, independent outcome checks, and reversible probes; both face substantial prior-art vulnerability. A addresses the most consequential setting but has greater governance and implementation complexity. C is structurally thoughtful yet depends most heavily on relational conditions that its proposed shadow study cannot decisively test.","confidence":"HIGH"}