{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C027","selector_replication":2,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":93,"causal_archetype_fit":91,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":57,"operational_specificity":96,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":91,"deployability_complexity":79,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":81,"empirical_partner_potential":94,"scrutiny_priority":88,"biggest_visible_risk":"The baseline-plus-learned-discrepancy approach looks highly vulnerable to established delta-learning and active-learning practice, potentially leaving little meaningful contrastive claim after scrutiny.","rationale":"Reference-query scarcity is consequential and the proposal specifies exact targets, provenance, independent audits, protected invariants, fallback, and an unusually decisive equal-budget comparison against both a direct surrogate and the uncorrected baseline. A computational partner could run the fully reversible offline study with complete reference outputs. Its main weakness is not empirical tractability but prior-art resilience."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":63,"causal_archetype_fit":86,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":69,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":78,"deployability_complexity":76,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":65,"empirical_partner_potential":81,"scrutiny_priority":72,"biggest_visible_risk":"The asserted Raman transmission, storage, and attention bottleneck may not be binding enough to justify a synchronized predictive codec with audits and fallback traffic.","rationale":"The reconstructive residual mechanism, raw-spectrum controls, safety bypasses, and blinded shadow test are coherent and bounded. However, the proposal bundles byte reduction with chemist-attention triage even though reconstructed chronological spectra may still require review, and ordinary spectra may be inexpensive to retain and transmit. The intervention could therefore lose on total governed cost despite technically successful reconstruction."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":80,"causal_archetype_fit":83,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":66,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":88,"deployability_complexity":82,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":74,"empirical_partner_potential":90,"scrutiny_priority":82,"biggest_visible_risk":"Standardization and model-based routing may suppress unfamiliar raw characterization evidence before it is represented as a residual, undermining the claimed protection against campaign blind spots.","rationale":"Scarce scientific review and follow-up capacity are credible, and the frozen-prediction shadow comparison can directly test action concordance, workload, protected-case capture, and fallback. The partner path is strong because all packages remain authoritative during the pilot. Strict potential is lower because mixed numerical, categorical, and raw-instrument outputs are only partly reconstructable, while the overall workflow resembles governed anomaly triage and active learning."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":88,"causal_archetype_fit":97,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":84,"operational_specificity":96,"falsifiability_test_quality":97,"adopter_partner_path":90,"deployability_complexity":72,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":87,"empirical_partner_potential":95,"scrutiny_priority":92,"biggest_visible_risk":"A command-synchronized external interaction can resemble the predicted self-generated response and be cancelled while checksums, reconstruction, and drift indicators remain nominal.","rationale":"The outgoing command is causally indispensable rather than decorative: it generates a pre-response prediction of the recoater's own multisensor signature, enabling a sharply contrastive residual claim. The proposal has explicit scope, synchronization, independent raw audits, protected safety channels, reversible shadow deployment, and controlled challenges capable of exposing its central over-cancellation failure. Real-time multisensor integration is demanding, but a bounded machine-safe partner study can resolve the decisive uncertainty."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_B"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_D","portfolio_observation":"D offers the strongest combination of causally essential archetype use, contrastive resilience, and a decisive bounded partner test. A is nearly as compelling empirically but faces substantially greater prior-art vulnerability. C is a credible partner-study opportunity with weaker reconstructive purity, while B's elaborate governance rests on the least convincing binding bottleneck.","confidence":"HIGH"}