{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C030","selector_replication":3,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":85,"causal_archetype_fit":94,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":78,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":87,"deployability_complexity":66,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":84,"empirical_partner_potential":92,"scrutiny_priority":89,"biggest_visible_risk":"A mistimed or insufficiently scoped acoustic model could suppress real dialogue or safety-relevant sound that overlaps the predicted equipment signature.","rationale":"The command copy is causally essential rather than decorative: removing it collapses the proposal into ordinary noise reduction. The read-only shadow test is unusually bounded, decision-relevant, and capable of exposing protected-signal misses, reconstruction failure, excessive burden, and weak problem prevalence. Raw-track preservation, immediate fallback, and clear human authority make the first step reversible. Its main weaknesses are demanding synchronization and source-response modeling, plus uncertainty about how often enrolled equipment produces a consequential monitoring problem."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":80,"causal_archetype_fit":82,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":62,"operational_specificity":76,"falsifiability_test_quality":88,"adopter_partner_path":84,"deployability_complexity":52,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":65,"empirical_partner_potential":84,"scrutiny_priority":75,"biggest_visible_risk":"Creating reliable observed continuity states may require nearly the same full-context human review the residual workflow is intended to reduce.","rationale":"Late continuity discoveries are consequential, and the retrospective counterbalanced test can directly measure misses, reconstruction agreement, review time, and manifest-maintenance cost. The authority and rollback design are strong. However, the proposal spans many subjective and heterogeneous variables without a sufficiently concrete acquisition method, making its claimed attention savings vulnerable to circularity. It also resembles formalized continuity logs and exception reporting, so a durable contrastive claim may depend heavily on whether reconstructive residual review yields measured savings."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":89,"causal_archetype_fit":88,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":55,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":91,"deployability_complexity":68,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":67,"empirical_partner_potential":93,"scrutiny_priority":82,"biggest_visible_risk":"Existing render caching, dependency invalidation, differential rendering, and full-render validation may absorb most of the claimed contrast.","rationale":"This targets a costly, measurable bottleneck and provides the strongest partner-ready experiment: archived transitions, complete-render ground truth, blinded review questions, resource accounting, and explicit failure triggers. The proposal is technically concrete and confines residual reconstruction to intermediate review. Its major vulnerability is prior-art proximity, while global dependencies and nondeterminism may erase savings. Even so, a willing VFX partner could resolve the decisive cost-versus-fidelity uncertainty quickly and safely."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":82,"causal_archetype_fit":91,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":33,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":86,"deployability_complexity":71,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":44,"empirical_partner_potential":81,"scrutiny_priority":65,"biggest_visible_risk":"The core intervention appears textually close to conventional predictive video coding with region-weighted quality, keyframes, synchronization checks, and fallback.","rationale":"The constrained-link problem is credible, and the proposed offline comparison can cleanly test bandwidth, latency, fidelity, fallback frequency, and coverage judgments without risking originals. Endpoint synchronization, protected metadata, and rollback are well specified. However, the archetype maps almost directly onto established codec functions, and the governance and audit additions may not leave a meaningful contrastive technical claim. Scrutiny is still warranted after the stronger candidates because a partner could test production value, but strict opportunity is visibly weak."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_D"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_A","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually strong on reversibility, explicit authority, provenance, fallback, and falsifiable shadow studies. The separating issue is contrastive durability: A uses an action-command copy to create a genuinely causal monitoring residual; C offers an excellent empirical test despite substantial incremental-rendering prior-art vulnerability; B may reproduce its review burden while constructing observations; and D most closely resembles a governed application of standard predictive coding.","confidence":"HIGH"}