{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C032","selector_replication":2,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":86,"causal_archetype_fit":96,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":72,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":85,"deployability_complexity":73,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":82,"empirical_partner_potential":87,"scrutiny_priority":85,"biggest_visible_risk":"The core architecture may collapse under scrutiny into familiar client prediction, reconciliation, and delta synchronization, leaving little meaningful contrast after its substantial protocol machinery is counted.","rationale":"The proposal addresses a credible interaction problem and makes command-conditioned prediction, reconstructible residuals, synchronization, audits, and fallback causally central. Its simulator study is unusually concrete and reversible. However, concurrency, hidden constraints, accessibility of provisional state, and protocol overhead could erase the benefit, while the nearest-practice boundary appears vulnerable."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":82,"causal_archetype_fit":87,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":68,"operational_specificity":89,"falsifiability_test_quality":90,"adopter_partner_path":84,"deployability_complexity":74,"authority_safety_reversibility":91,"strict_potential":70,"empirical_partner_potential":85,"scrutiny_priority":78,"biggest_visible_risk":"Plural legitimate task paths may make model-relative departures a poor proxy for breakdowns, consuming review effort while disproportionately surfacing accessibility or atypical strategies.","rationale":"The review-capacity problem is credible, and the offline, consent-bound comparison can decisively test whether residual selection improves useful evidence yield after accounting for modeling and audit labor. Yet the intervention resembles anomaly-ranked session replay, depends on a stable task-flow model, and may require much of the context it proposes to compress. Its strongest lane is a willing UX-research partner rather than a strict opportunity."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":94,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":78,"operational_specificity":96,"falsifiability_test_quality":96,"adopter_partner_path":94,"deployability_complexity":86,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":88,"empirical_partner_potential":95,"scrutiny_priority":94,"biggest_visible_risk":"Residual emphasis may cause users to miss a uniformly wrong selection or operation that executes exactly as declared, even when the preview reconstruction is technically correct.","rationale":"This is the strongest combination of consequential problem, bounded intervention, clear authority, reversibility, and decision-changing evaluation. The independent noncommitting dry run creates a concrete expected-versus-actual comparison, while protected bypasses, raw samples, full-preview fallback, immutable snapshots, and disabled commits make the first study safe. Prior-art vulnerability remains around filtered diffs and exception-focused previews, but the explicit contract-to-dry-run residual loop offers a meaningful contrast to scrutinize."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":95,"causal_archetype_fit":94,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":83,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":93,"adopter_partner_path":91,"deployability_complexity":69,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":80,"empirical_partner_potential":94,"scrutiny_priority":91,"biggest_visible_risk":"Predictable announcements may be essential orientation cues, so suppressing their full form could worsen accessibility despite perfect residual reconstruction and complete protected-event handling.","rationale":"The proposal targets a high-consequence serial-attention problem, and command-conditioned residual speech makes the archetype essential rather than decorative. The offline replay, protected-event completeness checks, injected failures, user-controlled fallback, and orientation outcomes create an excellent empirical-partner study. Strict potential is moderated by the need for reliable application manifests, exact accessibility-tree synchronization, and evidence that nominal consequences can safely be abbreviated for diverse users."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_B"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_C","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals provide unusually strong versioning, raw-audit, fallback, and reversible-study controls. C leads through its pre-commit decision point and independent dry-run truth source; D offers the highest-value partner-resolvable accessibility uncertainty; A has the cleanest technical archetype mapping but greater familiar-practice vulnerability; B is most exposed to model pluralism and anomaly-triage prior-art resemblance.","confidence":"MODERATE"}