{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C033","selector_replication":1,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":64,"causal_archetype_fit":82,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":66,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":68,"deployability_complexity":56,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":60,"empirical_partner_potential":78,"scrutiny_priority":65,"biggest_visible_risk":"The claimed human burden may be weak because maintainers may not ordinarily inspect a complete theorem-level migration record when full checking, dependency analysis, and focused source review already identify actionable changes.","rationale":"The frozen predictions, independent full-corpus checking, typed residuals, protected-event bypasses, audits, and decompression make the archetype causal and the shadow replay unusually testable. However, foundational migrations may be infrequent, the impact model is costly, and the proposal needs partner evidence that redundant theorem-by-theorem review is a consequential bottleneck rather than a constructed baseline."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":84,"causal_archetype_fit":90,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":45,"operational_specificity":93,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":80,"deployability_complexity":60,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":70,"empirical_partner_potential":91,"scrutiny_priority":82,"biggest_visible_risk":"The core architecture may collapse under scrutiny into familiar validated predictor-corrector continuation with checkpointing, certification, adaptive steps, and cold-start verification.","rationale":"This addresses a consequential mathematical failure mode—silently following a wrong branch—within a sharply bounded mesh and supplies decisive tests for reconstruction, branch agreement, certification, cost, and invalidation after bad anchors. Independent verification and cold-start fallback preserve authority. Its main weakness is prior-art vulnerability and the possibility that full certificates or validated corrections dominate costs, leaving little benefit from residual representation."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":75,"causal_archetype_fit":78,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":55,"operational_specificity":89,"falsifiability_test_quality":93,"adopter_partner_path":77,"deployability_complexity":69,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":61,"empirical_partner_potential":86,"scrutiny_priority":74,"biggest_visible_risk":"A misspecified atlas can classify an entire mathematically meaningful minority subclass as normal, while ordinary complete-result storage and querying may already be cheap enough to remove the proposed benefit.","rationale":"The finite scope, explicit missingness, protected predicate failures, retained complete results, planted-event evaluation, and regional fallback create a strong partner study. Residual learning is structurally relevant to finding regime boundaries, but the intervention resembles model-based exception routing and anomaly detection, and it must beat simpler tables, filters, aggregation, and witness-first reporting without hiding unfamiliar structure."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":62,"causal_archetype_fit":80,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":62,"operational_specificity":89,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":75,"deployability_complexity":67,"authority_safety_reversibility":98,"strict_potential":58,"empirical_partner_potential":80,"scrutiny_priority":68,"biggest_visible_risk":"The proposal may optimize a workflow that reviewers rarely perform, since proof review commonly centers on scripts, selected interactive states, dependencies, and kernel results rather than inspection of every full post-command state.","rationale":"The archived-corpus replay is safe, reversible, and capable of testing exact reconstruction, protected-change recall, reviewer time, and total cost. One-step residual reconstruction fits the archetype well. Yet the predictor may duplicate substantial checker or elaborator work, and folding, state diffs, dependency linting, or selective state display may address the practical burden more simply."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_A"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_B","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually specific, safe, and falsifiable, so the principal separation comes from problem reality and resilience to simpler rivals. B offers the strongest consequential failure mode and cleanest partner-resolvable uncertainty despite high prior-art vulnerability; C follows as an accessible empirical study. A and D both risk constructing exhaustive-review baselines that may not reflect actual mathematical practice.","confidence":"MODERATE"}