{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C034","selector_replication":1,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":88,"causal_archetype_fit":91,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":69,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":88,"deployability_complexity":72,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":85,"empirical_partner_potential":93,"scrutiny_priority":90,"biggest_visible_risk":"The apparent capacity problem may disappear after counting local digitization, prediction, buffering, synchronization, auditing, and frequent full-waveform fallback, leaving conventional compression or buffered detection superior.","rationale":"The proposal targets a credible multichannel bandwidth problem and makes predictive reconstruction, signed residuals, synchronization, independent raw audits, and fallback causally central. Its bounded offline comparison is unusually decisive and safe. The principal vulnerability is that predictive coding and event-triggered buffering may look like an elaborate combination of familiar acquisition practices whose overhead erases the claimed advantage."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":65,"causal_archetype_fit":78,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":55,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":93,"adopter_partner_path":82,"deployability_complexity":60,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":65,"empirical_partner_potential":82,"scrutiny_priority":69,"biggest_visible_risk":"Complete spectra may not impose a genuinely binding transport or supervision burden, making the reconstructive residual codec and hierarchy unnecessary relative to ordinary multivariate process monitoring.","rationale":"The recipe scope, provenance, authority boundaries, raw audits, and held-out replay are strong. However, the problem statement provides less convincing evidence that spectral transport or processing is scarce, and the hierarchical residual stack risks becoming decorative around a standard trajectory-monitoring task. A partner could resolve this, but the proposal has weaker strict opportunity than the others."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":86,"causal_archetype_fit":85,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":56,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":90,"deployability_complexity":75,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":76,"empirical_partner_potential":91,"scrutiny_priority":82,"biggest_visible_risk":"Layout-conditioned image subtraction and defect triage may be too close to standard inspection practice for the synchronized reconstructive residual channel to retain a meaningful contrastive advantage.","rationale":"Inspection volume and reviewer scarcity are credible, the layout supplies a strong prediction source, and the offline shadow replay is bounded and decision-relevant. Deployment can remain non-actuating with complete raw evidence. Its weakness is prior-art vulnerability: the core may reduce to familiar design-to-image comparison, patch routing, and full-tile retrieval with added synchronization and governance."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":84,"causal_archetype_fit":96,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":72,"operational_specificity":93,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":86,"deployability_complexity":63,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":84,"empirical_partner_potential":92,"scrutiny_priority":92,"biggest_visible_risk":"Model error or timing misalignment could cancel a genuine contact event, while digital residual processing may not recover dynamic range already lost or saturated in the physical sensing chain.","rationale":"Efference-copy prediction is causally essential rather than decorative, and the proposal states a sharp contrast involving command-induced response, external interaction, latency, and protected bypasses. Hardware-in-the-loop shadow testing can directly falsify over-cancellation and latency benefit without granting actuation authority. It merits first scrutiny because both the opportunity and the decisive safety concern can be tested, though familiar feedforward and innovation methods remain serious rivals."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_B"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_D","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually specific, reversible, and testable, but they differ in whether residual processing solves a binding problem and remains contrastive against familiar practice. D has the strongest causal use of the archetype; A has the clearest systems-capacity case; C offers an excellent partner study but faces obvious inspection prior-art exposure; B has strong experimental design around the least convincing bottleneck.","confidence":"HIGH"}