{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C036","selector_replication":2,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":82,"causal_archetype_fit":95,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":84,"operational_specificity":93,"falsifiability_test_quality":85,"adopter_partner_path":79,"deployability_complexity":57,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":73,"empirical_partner_potential":85,"scrutiny_priority":86,"biggest_visible_risk":"Researcher and participant actions may be recursively co-produced, making the proposed separation of predicted researcher effects from residual change conceptually invalid.","rationale":"The problem is consequential and the outgoing-action copy, prospective prediction, comparator, and fallback make the archetype causally essential rather than decorative. The shadow pilot is bounded and can expose attribution disagreement, but prospective modeling is labor-intensive and even technically accurate cancellation may remove the interactional phenomenon of interest."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":91,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":61,"operational_specificity":96,"falsifiability_test_quality":78,"adopter_partner_path":93,"deployability_complexity":84,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":79,"empirical_partner_potential":95,"scrutiny_priority":91,"biggest_visible_risk":"Displaying the prior roster may anchor recall and systematically suppress absent, new, or reclassified relationships despite flawless delta reconstruction.","rationale":"This addresses a concrete recurring burden with a tightly specified participant-controlled codec, explicit silence states, checksum protection, periodic refresh, and readily available full-roster fallback. It has an unusually clear institutional adopter and partner study path. Its strict claim is vulnerable because prefilled panel forms and change-only elicitation look like close rivals, and the proposed offline test cannot resolve the decisive anchoring and interview-burden questions."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":86,"causal_archetype_fit":88,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":67,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":89,"deployability_complexity":75,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":72,"empirical_partner_potential":92,"scrutiny_priority":84,"biggest_visible_risk":"Routine-looking narrative detail may carry distributed interactional meaning, so residual packets can reconstruct the event skeleton while still changing or degrading its interpretation.","rationale":"The review bottleneck is plausible, protected bypasses and raw-note fallback are strong, and the proposed blinded retrospective comparison directly tests time savings, consequential misses, subgroup errors, and interpretation disagreement. However, the intervention remains vulnerable to collapsing into conventional qualitative priority coding or exception reporting, and maintaining templates may consume the attention it aims to save."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":65,"causal_archetype_fit":87,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":82,"operational_specificity":90,"falsifiability_test_quality":86,"adopter_partner_path":58,"deployability_complexity":41,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":57,"empirical_partner_potential":66,"scrutiny_priority":63,"biggest_visible_risk":"Decomposing situated ritual competence into predicted transitions may train surface conformity, freeze a contested variant, and weaken holistic relational learning.","rationale":"The layered residual routing, uncued rehearsal test, variant checksums, and council-only model authority are thoughtfully specified and reversible. Nonetheless, the initial problem is less clearly established, the intervention carries substantial governance and model-maintenance burdens, and adoption depends on a community authority accepting representation of a sensitive living practice before the proposed empirical lane can begin."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_D"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_B","portfolio_observation":"B offers the strongest empirical-partner opportunity and the clearest deployable workflow, though its prior-art exposure should be scrutinized closely. A has the most causally essential and potentially distinctive archetype mapping but faces a foundational separability challenge. C has the best immediately decision-relevant comparative test but a weaker contrast from established qualitative triage. D is exceptionally well governed yet combines the least demonstrated problem with the highest adoption and cultural-modeling burden.","confidence":"MODERATE"}