{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C038","selector_replication":3,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":87,"causal_archetype_fit":96,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":76,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":86,"deployability_complexity":82,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":91,"empirical_partner_potential":89,"scrutiny_priority":93,"biggest_visible_risk":"The equivalence tolerances and abstract input state may either omit physically material dynamics or become broad enough to admit consequential response differences.","rationale":"This is the cleanest representation-substitution problem: it explicitly limits equivalence to alternate encodings of one approved aerodynamic model rather than conflating different physical models. The contract, seeded defects, bounded offline evaluation, and decision-relevant falsifiers are unusually specific. The first study is reversible and can establish whether semantic portability exists without touching operational systems."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":94,"causal_archetype_fit":87,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":61,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":88,"adopter_partner_path":75,"deployability_complexity":58,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":75,"empirical_partner_potential":82,"scrutiny_priority":80,"biggest_visible_risk":"A public mode abstraction may either suppress crew-relevant transient behavior or reproduce the incumbent state machine under renamed states.","rationale":"The annunciation-coherence problem is consequential and the laboratory trace study is bounded, safe, and capable of rejecting seeded contradictions. However, timing, coupled-axis behavior, target validity, and human interpretation make the behavioral boundary difficult to specify independently of system architecture. Its strict claim is also vulnerable to looking like established mode-interface and state-machine assurance practice, though a partner could resolve the decisive abstraction question."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":92,"causal_archetype_fit":72,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":63,"operational_specificity":84,"falsifiability_test_quality":78,"adopter_partner_path":75,"deployability_complexity":61,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":64,"empirical_partner_potential":77,"scrutiny_priority":70,"biggest_visible_risk":"The containment relation may erase essential differences among probabilistic, bounded-error, and intent-based uncertainty, making purported substitutes semantically different predictors rather than different representations.","rationale":"Client coupling to waypoint structure is credible and the offline replay plan is safe and testable. The central abstraction is less secure: sampled paths, splines, reachable sets, and particle predictions do not necessarily denote one common flight volume under a shared uncertainty interpretation. Without resolving that issue, matching conflict-query behavior could be scenario-specific or achieved through an over-coarse contract."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":93,"causal_archetype_fit":94,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":73,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":93,"adopter_partner_path":92,"deployability_complexity":76,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":88,"empirical_partner_potential":94,"scrutiny_priority":91,"biggest_visible_risk":"Maintenance-obligation meaning may depend on program, jurisdiction, configuration, and evidence-authority context omitted from the proposed abstract state.","rationale":"Direct storage coupling and divergent maintenance status are concrete, consequential problems, and the stateful ledger archetype is causally central. The shadow replay, immutable reference model, conflict-preserving semantics, seeded faults, and explicit human authority create an excellent empirical-partner path. It ranks just below A because faithfully encoding the governing maintenance rules and historical context is a larger dependency and may turn the contract into a substantial rules-platform project."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_C"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_A","portfolio_observation":"A and D best preserve the crucial distinction between alternate representations of one semantic object and genuinely different domain models. A offers the strongest bounded strict test, while D offers the strongest partner-resolvable operational study. B remains valuable but faces a harder crew-observable state boundary; C is most exposed to conflating representation substitution with differences in prediction meaning.","confidence":"HIGH"}