{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C039","selector_replication":3,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":89,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":62,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":84,"deployability_complexity":72,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":86,"empirical_partner_potential":89,"scrutiny_priority":89,"biggest_visible_risk":"The ledger may produce impeccable digital consistency while the consequential lineage errors actually arise from missing labels, inaccurate measurements, or unrecorded physical events.","rationale":"The proposal makes representation independence causally central: opaque operations, atomic material-accounting laws, append-only corrections, and one cross-implementation oracle directly address schema-dependent behavior. Its synthetic two-ledger study is bounded, reversible, and capable of rejecting concrete defects. The visible contrast is credible, although lot genealogy, event-ledger, audit, and inventory-control patterns make prior-art vulnerability substantial, and legacy facts may not support the abstraction."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":80,"causal_archetype_fit":87,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":43,"operational_specificity":87,"falsifiability_test_quality":88,"adopter_partner_path":72,"deployability_complexity":64,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":71,"empirical_partner_potential":76,"scrutiny_priority":73,"biggest_visible_risk":"The proposed equivalence relation may be scientifically incomplete or non-transitive under tolerance, so hiding representation could erase meaningful distinctions rather than preserve one abstract material state.","rationale":"Permutation, wrapping, origin-shift, and cell-reexpression tests closely match the stated representation problem, and the ordered-only sandbox is safe and executable. However, structure canonicalization and representation-invariant comparison look especially vulnerable to well-developed prior approaches, while tolerance, symmetry, provenance, and omitted physical distinctions make the abstraction difficult to stabilize. A partner could test client breakage, but the initial synthetic study mainly establishes contract executability rather than consequential benefit."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":85,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":55,"operational_specificity":93,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":78,"deployability_complexity":70,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":82,"empirical_partner_potential":84,"scrutiny_priority":82,"biggest_visible_risk":"Tolerance-based conformance on sampled states can admit evaluators that diverge materially between samples or at narrow boundaries while appearing substitutable.","rationale":"This is a clean archetype application: the scientific surface, domains, reference states, derivatives, errors, and provenance form an explicit abstract value while coefficients and evaluator machinery remain hidden. The analytic-versus-spline experiment, corrupted implementations, boundary checks, and relational tests provide an unusually decisive first falsification step. It remains vulnerable to prior-art scrutiny because property-provider APIs and evaluator validation are natural-looking practices, and a synthetic single-phase release may understate production phase, uncertainty, and numerical-conditioning difficulties."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":95,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":69,"operational_specificity":96,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":88,"deployability_complexity":57,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":81,"empirical_partner_potential":95,"scrutiny_priority":92,"biggest_visible_risk":"Passing a simulated lifecycle contract could create false confidence despite scientifically consequential differences in instrument timing, calibration, control dynamics, firmware safety behavior, and physical terminal state.","rationale":"The proposal targets a consequential and observable problem where vendor representation leaks can change actuation semantics, not merely software convenience. Its explicit lifecycle, authorization gates, cutoff precedence, stale-data policy, idempotent abort, fault injection, and mutated adapters create a strong, non-actuating test that can change the decision to proceed to hardware qualification. Production substitution is complex and strict interchangeability is deliberately limited by physical capabilities, but that limitation makes it particularly strong in the empirical-partner lane: a laboratory partner can authorize staged simulator and hardware studies with clear halt conditions."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_B"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_D","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually operational and safe, so the main separation is consequentiality, prior-art vulnerability, and whether the first study resolves a deployment-relevant uncertainty. D offers the strongest partner-resolvable execution risk; A has the best balance of strict contract clarity and operational relevance; C has the cleanest oracle but a more standard-looking abstraction; B faces the most difficult scientific-equivalence boundary and the greatest apparent prior-art exposure.","confidence":"MODERATE"}