{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C040","selector_replication":1,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":87,"causal_archetype_fit":91,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":79,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":93,"adopter_partner_path":80,"deployability_complexity":73,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":82,"empirical_partner_potential":87,"scrutiny_priority":85,"biggest_visible_risk":"The abstraction may erase source-specific legal, collection, or observation distinctions, making apparently equivalent trajectories substantively unlike.","rationale":"The proposal targets consequential migration-induced changes in longitudinal research inputs, and the abstract-state-machine archetype directly addresses dependence on rows, joins, nulls, and temporal knowledge. Its three-way event-window result, versioned policies, synthetic dual-representation trial, and decision-relevant falsifiers are unusually concrete. Scrutiny should focus on whether adequate-observation and event-equivalence rules can be shared without concealing material source context."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":93,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":69,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":88,"deployability_complexity":81,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":86,"empirical_partner_potential":89,"scrutiny_priority":87,"biggest_visible_risk":"A behavioral contract could omit legally or scientifically essential native-record artifacts while still appearing to preserve custody continuity.","rationale":"Evidence continuity is highly consequential, the operations and invariants closely match the alleged representation-coupling mechanism, and a laboratory quality authority offers a credible adoption and study path. The synthetic scenario suite is bounded and can expose contract omissions before production use. Its main vulnerability is that abstract custody state machines and conformance testing resemble familiar evidence-management practices, so the remaining contrastive claim may narrow substantially under scrutiny."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":90,"causal_archetype_fit":90,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":75,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":85,"deployability_complexity":75,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":80,"empirical_partner_potential":87,"scrutiny_priority":83,"biggest_visible_risk":"Tool-neutral corpus equivalence may conceal extraction-method or parser-specific context needed to assess the reliability and meaning of an artifact.","rationale":"The fixed-image setting, sealed snapshots, explicit provenance and qualification rules, and predeclared synthetic-image tests make this a strong empirical-partner candidate. The archetype is essential for isolating client-facing semantics from vendor layouts. However, the proposal must maintain a difficult boundary between software substitutability and scientific equivalence; if reviewers require tool-native diagnostics or method context, the useful substitution claim may become comparatively narrow."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":86,"causal_archetype_fit":96,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":85,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":91,"deployability_complexity":85,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":90,"empirical_partner_potential":93,"scrutiny_priority":93,"biggest_visible_risk":"Software-level indistinguishability may create false confidence when physical materials, scheduling, administrator conduct, or unusual case facts still reveal the exercise.","rationale":"This is the clearest causal use of the archetype: representation leakage directly defeats blindness, while inconsistent state transitions compromise submission finality and assessment history. The role-scoped lifecycle, declared observable boundary, paired ordinary-case facades, transcript comparison, and explicit intervention falsifier create a bounded test capable of changing an adoption decision. Authority is clear, the first step avoids live personnel and cases, and rollback is straightforward."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_C"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_D","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals offer credible synthetic conformance studies, but they differ in how separable contract semantics are from domain truth. Candidate D has the tightest link between representation opacity and the protected objective, while B offers the strongest consequential institutional use case. A and C remain attractive partner studies, though both face greater risk that omitted source or method context defeats meaningful substitutability.","confidence":"HIGH"}