{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C041","selector_replication":3,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":84,"causal_archetype_fit":96,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":74,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":93,"adopter_partner_path":82,"deployability_complexity":64,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":89,"empirical_partner_potential":85,"scrutiny_priority":87,"biggest_visible_risk":"The abstract totals and tolerance-based oracle may omit process-relevant state, allowing scientifically nonequivalent snow dynamics to appear substitutable.","rationale":"The proposal identifies concrete host reach-through and makes the abstraction archetype causally central through opaque state, conservation laws, checkpoint semantics, stable errors, and a shared oracle. Its isolated two-implementation benchmark is unusually specific, reversible, and capable of rejecting both the problem diagnosis and the intervention. The main scrutiny question is whether representation-independent scientific-component contracts already cover much of the claim and whether aggregate-state equivalence can safely support substitution."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":93,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":83,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":88,"deployability_complexity":84,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":85,"empirical_partner_potential":94,"scrutiny_priority":92,"biggest_visible_risk":"A behavioral boundary contract may be unable to hide enough construction detail to remain meaningfully representation-independent while still addressing site-specific safety, maintenance, and regulatory requirements.","rationale":"This is a consequential physical-infrastructure problem with a clear causal link between prescriptive representation, undeclared stateful behavior, and substitution failure. The proposal sharply separates black-box hydraulic service conformance from mandatory structural, ecological, and regulatory inspection. Although deployment is complex and site-specific, the non-operational simulation or isolated-rig study gives a municipal or engineering partner a bounded way to resolve the decisive uncertainty without risking live drainage."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":90,"causal_archetype_fit":94,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":68,"operational_specificity":96,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":91,"deployability_complexity":50,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":91,"empirical_partner_potential":90,"scrutiny_priority":89,"biggest_visible_risk":"Contract extraction may canonize accidental spreadsheet behavior as approved drought policy rather than revealing a clean implementation-independent specification.","rationale":"The proposal is bounded, highly testable, easy to shadow, and careful to preserve human decision authority. Stateful hysteresis, insufficiency, corrections, invalidation, stable reasons, and receipts make the archetype more than a decorative input schema. It has excellent strict and partner potential, but its core techniques resemble familiar rules-engine specification, differential testing, and policy-versioning practices, increasing vulnerability to prior art and reducing the likely remaining contrastive claim."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":88,"causal_archetype_fit":91,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":59,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":87,"deployability_complexity":57,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":83,"empirical_partner_potential":87,"scrutiny_priority":82,"biggest_visible_risk":"The intervention closely resembles established versioned data-ledger, provenance, quality-control, and schema-abstraction practice, leaving a potentially narrow contrastive claim.","rationale":"The representation-coupling problem is credible, and the read-only replay with two backends is safe, specific, and decision-relevant. Lineage, as-of queries, quality reversals, coverage, unit semantics, and variable-appropriate aggregation give the contract substantive content. However, the proposal is the most exposed to known-looking data-platform practice, and its remaining distinction may reduce to combining familiar evidence-management mechanisms under one conformance suite."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_D"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_B","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually operational and reversible; the main separator is not test quality but the likely size of the contrastive claim after prior-art scrutiny. B offers the strongest empirical-partner lane and the most distinctive transfer of the archetype to a physical service boundary. C and A are close: C is easier and more consequential operationally, while A has slightly stronger strict archetype purity. D is credible and testable but appears most vulnerable to being absorbed by familiar data-governance practice.","confidence":"MODERATE"}