{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C042","selector_replication":1,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":86,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":76,"operational_specificity":93,"falsifiability_test_quality":88,"adopter_partner_path":84,"deployability_complexity":61,"authority_safety_reversibility":89,"strict_potential":75,"empirical_partner_potential":86,"scrutiny_priority":81,"biggest_visible_risk":"The semantic-endpoint abstraction may omit fixture-specific spectral, optical, spatial, flicker, and interpolation behavior that is part of the approved creative result rather than replaceable representation detail.","rationale":"The proposal makes the archetype causally central and supplies unusually explicit lifecycle, conflict, abort, enrollment, and metamorphic tests. Its isolated-bay study is authorized and reversible. However, physical equivalence and photographed-light measurement make the oracle difficult, while an abstraction that is sufficiently complete may become rig-specific or operationally heavy."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":92,"causal_archetype_fit":96,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":77,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":94,"deployability_complexity":85,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":89,"empirical_partner_potential":96,"scrutiny_priority":94,"biggest_visible_risk":"Necessary clock provenance, diagnostic evidence, or production-specific channel facts may not fit the common-time abstraction without exposing representation-specific information.","rationale":"This is a consequential, bounded synchronization problem with a crisp abstract value: stream membership and interval-bounded mappings into common take time. Renaming, registration-order, clock-origin, and segmentation transformations can decisively test the claim on copied media. The read-only partner study has clear authorities, rollback, and decision-changing falsifiers, though diagnostic obligations could weaken opacity."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":90,"causal_archetype_fit":94,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":69,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":90,"adopter_partner_path":92,"deployability_complexity":82,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":84,"empirical_partner_potential":92,"scrutiny_priority":88,"biggest_visible_risk":"Department-specific editorial layer, effect-construction, or nesting intent may be indispensable meaning that the proposed department-neutral cut model cannot preserve.","rationale":"The proposal targets a credible turnover problem and clearly distinguishes a behavioral contract from a canonical interchange format. A short read-only sequence with relayout, retime, transition, nesting, and revision offers a strong bounded study. Its strict claim is more vulnerable because locked-cut abstractions and adapters look close to familiar interchange practice, and sufficiency across departments may require substantial representation-specific semantics."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":95,"causal_archetype_fit":97,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":72,"operational_specificity":96,"falsifiability_test_quality":97,"adopter_partner_path":94,"deployability_complexity":88,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":93,"empirical_partner_potential":95,"scrutiny_priority":96,"biggest_visible_risk":"Authorized clients may genuinely require codec-native, container-level, GPU-surface, byte-layout, or performance properties, forcing profiles that recreate the coupling behind the abstraction.","rationale":"The problem is broad but concrete, and immutable frame/sample observations give the archetype an especially strong causal role. Exact known-content fixtures, an independent reference model, partition laws, and relocation, rewrap, rechunk, and cache transformations form a decisive oracle. The copied-media sandbox is safe and readily adoptable; the main scrutiny question is whether named profiles can remain bounded rather than becoming representation escape hatches."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_A"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_D","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are structurally strong and partner-testable, but D and B have the cleanest representation-independent observables and the most decisive low-risk experiments. C faces greater prior-art and semantic-completeness pressure, while A has the hardest measurement problem and the greatest chance that supposedly hidden physical details are actually essential behavior.","confidence":"HIGH"}