{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C042","selector_replication":2,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":89,"causal_archetype_fit":91,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":60,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":81,"deployability_complexity":61,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":76,"empirical_partner_potential":86,"scrutiny_priority":82,"biggest_visible_risk":"The proposed essence abstraction may omit production-essential representation-specific behavior, forcing codec, container, GPU, metadata, precision, or performance coupling back through rendition profiles.","rationale":"The proposal targets consequential media-access coupling with a highly explicit abstract state, behavioral laws, error model, and safe copied-media experiment. Its metamorphic and differential tests could decisively expose frame, sample, channel, and boundary divergence. Scrutiny should focus on whether the broad contract is genuinely sufficient and contrastive rather than a consolidation of familiar media-access and asset-management interfaces."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":83,"causal_archetype_fit":78,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":67,"operational_specificity":89,"falsifiability_test_quality":84,"adopter_partner_path":72,"deployability_complexity":43,"authority_safety_reversibility":86,"strict_potential":61,"empirical_partner_potential":77,"scrutiny_priority":68,"biggest_visible_risk":"Equivalent semantic commands may not yield equivalent photographed light because fixture spectrum, optics, placement, flicker, calibration, and console-native effects are essential behavior rather than hidden representation.","rationale":"The isolated simulator and prelight-bay path is unusually careful, with explicit authority, arming, enrollment, and abort rules. However, the causal abstraction is threatened by the physical rig: conformance at normalized endpoints or telemetry may not preserve the actual cinematic result. The need for bespoke instrumentation, safety approval, and physical tolerances also makes the decisive study harder to deploy."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":91,"causal_archetype_fit":94,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":72,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":91,"deployability_complexity":79,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":86,"empirical_partner_potential":95,"scrutiny_priority":93,"biggest_visible_risk":"The common-time abstraction may conceal necessary clock provenance, drift, discontinuity, or device-specific evidence, allowing implementations to pass a narrow oracle while producing operationally unacceptable synchronization.","rationale":"This is the strongest bounded partner study: copied media, read-only authority, a simple independent model, exact frame-to-sample mappings, deliberate conflicts and gaps, and several representation-only transformations. The archetype is causally central because the problem is precisely inconsistent semantic membership and correspondence across representations and algorithms. Results can clearly falsify the problem, the contract, or an adapter without touching production systems."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":93,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":58,"operational_specificity":90,"falsifiability_test_quality":89,"adopter_partner_path":89,"deployability_complexity":74,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":79,"empirical_partner_potential":90,"scrutiny_priority":86,"biggest_visible_risk":"A department-neutral locked-cut model may omit layer intent, effect construction, or other department-specific editorial meaning that is genuinely required for conform rather than accidental representation leakage.","rationale":"Turnover misinterpretation is consequential, the read-only sandbox is practical, and a short sequence containing transitions, retimes, nesting, and revision provides a decision-relevant test. The behavioral-contract framing is strong, but the intervention looks especially vulnerable to overlap with established interchange and timeline-abstraction practices, and success depends on proving that its semantic oracle adds more than a canonical normalized timeline."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_B"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_C","portfolio_observation":"All four use the archetype substantively and propose reversible tests, but they vary in whether the abstract observation boundary plausibly captures the domain's true meaning. C offers the cleanest decisive read-only experiment; D and A are strong but more exposed to familiar-interface prior art or scope expansion; B has the largest gap between software-level equivalence and the physical outcome that matters.","confidence":"HIGH"}