{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C042","selector_replication":3,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":88,"causal_archetype_fit":94,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":76,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":91,"deployability_complexity":82,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":90,"empirical_partner_potential":94,"scrutiny_priority":93,"biggest_visible_risk":"The common-time abstraction may omit production-essential clock provenance, drift, channel facts, or diagnostic evidence, making opacity incompatible with accountable synchronization work.","rationale":"The proposal identifies a consequential representation-coupling problem and makes the archetype causally essential through semantic membership, interval mappings, declared ambiguity, opacity, and a common oracle. Its copied-media trial is unusually bounded and decision-relevant: exact, generated, and metamorphic tests can distinguish adapter defects, contract defects, necessary representation obligations, and absence of the problem. Strong authority, read-only isolation, rollback, and two genuinely different implementations support both lanes."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":84,"causal_archetype_fit":86,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":72,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":88,"deployability_complexity":62,"authority_safety_reversibility":86,"strict_potential":73,"empirical_partner_potential":89,"scrutiny_priority":78,"biggest_visible_risk":"Semantic endpoint trajectories may fail to capture fixture-specific spectrum, optics, placement, flicker, dimming, and photographed appearance, so adapters could conform abstractly while producing materially different images.","rationale":"The behavioral contract, enrollment boundary, abort precedence, predetermined tolerances, simulator-first trial, and accountable cinematography and safety approvals are strong. However, the proposed abstraction crosses from software representation into physical light production, where supposedly hidden rig properties may be essential causal inputs. This weakens strict substitutability and increases deployment and safety complexity, though an isolated prelight partner could decisively test the uncertainty."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":93,"causal_archetype_fit":94,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":62,"operational_specificity":96,"falsifiability_test_quality":96,"adopter_partner_path":93,"deployability_complexity":86,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":89,"empirical_partner_potential":95,"scrutiny_priority":91,"biggest_visible_risk":"The component resembles familiar media-access and asset-abstraction practice, while necessary codec-native, container, GPU, interpretation, or performance obligations may reappear as profiles and erode the claimed representation independence.","rationale":"This is the clearest bounded engineering problem and the most executable test plan: known frames and samples, an independent model, exact boundary laws, declared gaps, lossless transformations, and a file-backed adapter yield strong falsification. The read-only authority and rollback path are excellent. It has very high partner value and strict technical quality, but its broad media-access boundary appears especially vulnerable to prior-art scrutiny and profile-based scope leakage."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":90,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":69,"operational_specificity":90,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":92,"deployability_complexity":79,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":85,"empirical_partner_potential":93,"scrutiny_priority":88,"biggest_visible_risk":"A department-neutral locked-cut model may omit layer intent, effect construction, or other representation-linked editorial meaning legitimately required by downstream departments.","rationale":"The proposal targets a real turnover failure mode and correctly makes abstract editorial meaning, rejection of ambiguous mappings, opacity, and cross-adapter conformance central. A read-only short sequence containing transitions, retimes, nesting, and revision provides a safe, authorized, falsifiable partner study. Its main weakness is semantic completeness: making every downstream conform equivalent may require exposing construction details or recreating a canonical interchange model, which also increases prior-art vulnerability."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_B"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_A","portfolio_observation":"All four are unusually specific and safely testable instances of the same representation-independent contract pattern. A offers the best balance of consequential coupling, archetype necessity, contrastive resilience, and bounded decisive evidence. C is the easiest high-value empirical trial but is more exposed to known-looking abstraction practice; D is strong but faces editorial-semantic completeness risk; B has an excellent partner experiment yet the largest gap between abstract conformance and the real physical outcome.","confidence":"HIGH"}