{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C046","selector_replication":2,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":90,"causal_archetype_fit":95,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":66,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":86,"deployability_complexity":84,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":89,"empirical_partner_potential":90,"scrutiny_priority":91,"biggest_visible_risk":"The abstract lineage model may omit policy-critical distinctions between specimens, aliquots, containers, composites, and custody events, making apparently conforming migrations semantically lossy.","rationale":"This is a consequential provenance problem with a tight causal link to representation leakage and backend substitution. The intervention specifies identities, transitions, invariants, errors, migration checks, and a safe synthetic test program whose results can directly stop adoption. Its main research vulnerability is that opaque lineage ledgers and conformance testing may resemble established provenance practice, but the specimen-specific contract and held-out migration tests leave a meaningful contrastive claim."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":84,"causal_archetype_fit":91,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":58,"operational_specificity":89,"falsifiability_test_quality":83,"adopter_partner_path":79,"deployability_complexity":72,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":76,"empirical_partner_potential":80,"scrutiny_priority":77,"biggest_visible_risk":"A common tolerance-band contract may either conceal fabrication-relevant boundary differences or become so representation-specific that analytic, polygonal, and voxel backends are not genuinely substitutable.","rationale":"The representation-independence archetype is central, and the proposed laws, three-valued classification, and isolated toy-backend test are concrete. However, nanoscale geometry is strongly coupled to discretization, numerical error, and downstream process physics, so passing the software contract may preserve only a weakened notion of pattern meaning. The approach also looks comparatively close to standard geometry-kernel abstraction and conformance practice."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":92,"causal_archetype_fit":88,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":61,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":77,"adopter_partner_path":91,"deployability_complexity":70,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":75,"empirical_partner_potential":88,"scrutiny_priority":84,"biggest_visible_risk":"Software-only synthetic traces cannot establish that physically different transducers measure the same measurand with comparable applicability and uncertainty, so semantic conformance may create false equivalence.","rationale":"Silent collapse of saturation, missingness, calibration scope, temporal support, and uncertainty into a number is a serious measurement problem, and the tagged observation contract is specific and causally relevant. The proposal has strong partner potential because metrology personnel could run a bounded comparison using controlled samples and predefined decision rules. Its strict case is weaker because the authorized first step tests simulators, while the decisive uncertainty concerns physical transduction and uncertainty comparability."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":94,"causal_archetype_fit":94,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":65,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":89,"adopter_partner_path":84,"deployability_complexity":65,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":82,"empirical_partner_potential":86,"scrutiny_priority":87,"biggest_visible_risk":"Simulator conformance may fail to predict safety-critical timing, sensing, stopping, and retraction behavior on real controllers, while hardware testing requires substantially greater authority and safeguards.","rationale":"Controller-specific completion and fault semantics create a concrete, consequential substitution hazard, and an explicit state machine with bounded side effects is causally essential rather than decorative. The simulator study is unusually specific, reversible, and capable of exposing under-specified transitions. Scrutiny should focus on whether the claim remains useful after established controller-interface practices and mandatory physical qualification are considered."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_B"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_A","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals instantiate the archetype competently, but their decisive evidence differs. A offers the cleanest software-bounded strict test; D combines high consequence with strong simulated falsification but faces a hardware-validation gap; C is best suited to an authorized empirical metrology partner; B is testable but most vulnerable to a contract that merely relocates discretization and tolerance choices.","confidence":"HIGH"}