{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C047","selector_replication":2,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":84,"causal_archetype_fit":85,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":63,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":83,"adopter_partner_path":84,"deployability_complexity":74,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":76,"empirical_partner_potential":87,"scrutiny_priority":81,"biggest_visible_risk":"Agreement among assessment routes would not establish that the capability contract is educationally valid or neutral across traditions, languages, and learning pathways.","rationale":"The proposal addresses consequential and observable inconsistency in prerequisite clearance, with unusually clear states, authority boundaries, rollback conditions, and a feasible synthetic pilot. The archetype matters because substitutability genuinely depends on separating readiness from course representation. Its contrastive position is vulnerable, however, to looking like a technically elaborate competency-based prior-learning assessment system, and its proposed test establishes procedural conformance rather than the validity of the readiness inference."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":85,"causal_archetype_fit":94,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":80,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":88,"deployability_complexity":87,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":92,"empirical_partner_potential":90,"scrutiny_priority":94,"biggest_visible_risk":"A technically clean behavioral surface may omit derivational or authority distinctions that custodians regard as constitutive rather than hidden implementation detail.","rationale":"This is the strongest bounded substitution problem: identical scoped queries can visibly diverge because authority, temporal conventions, ambiguity, and version behavior are entangled with engine representation. The intervention specifies a narrow resolver, explicit invariants, strong metamorphic tests, archived-version checks, and an attainable two-implementation pilot. It also preserves religious authority and reports underdetermination instead of selecting silently. Prior-art vulnerability remains around versioned calendar APIs, but the authority-scoped ambiguity and reproducibility contract supplies a meaningful contrastive claim."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":82,"causal_archetype_fit":91,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":72,"operational_specificity":93,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":89,"deployability_complexity":85,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":86,"empirical_partner_potential":91,"scrutiny_priority":89,"biggest_visible_risk":"The purportedly representation-independent abstract record may itself encode a contested comparative ontology and erase distinctions even when implementations pass every test.","rationale":"The migration and downstream-dependency problem is credible, and the proposal targets concrete failure modes such as unknown-versus-absent conflation, lost provenance, emic/etic overwriting, and weakened access restrictions. A 20-record copied corpus and independent in-memory implementation make the decisive test practical and reversible. Its weakness is prior-art vulnerability to established semantic interoperability, provenance, and access-control patterns, plus the difficulty of proving repository substitutability without embedding interpretive commitments in the contract."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":96,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":79,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":90,"adopter_partner_path":80,"deployability_complexity":68,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":78,"empirical_partner_potential":95,"scrutiny_priority":91,"biggest_visible_risk":"Formalizing community permission as a queryable state object may shift power toward institutions and misrepresent governance that is deliberately relational, contextual, or continuously negotiated.","rationale":"The problem is exceptionally consequential, and confusing record artifacts, institutional approval, or silence with community permission creates a direct causal role for explicit state, authority, transition, and disclosure invariants. Safety design is excellent: participation is opt-in, the first study is synthetic, technical actors cannot grant permission, and rollback is clear. Live deployment is institutionally complex and strict opportunity is limited by the possibility that the public contract itself is inappropriate. It is nevertheless the strongest empirical-partner opportunity because a willing stewardship body can decisively test whether its own synthetic policy survives two representations."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_A"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_B","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually specific and reversible, but their decisive uncertainty differs. B offers the cleanest strict technical contrast and bounded oracle; D offers the highest-value partner-resolved governance question; C is a strong archival interoperability pilot with greater semantic prior-art exposure; A is operationally mature but most vulnerable to collapsing into familiar competency assessment while leaving construct validity unresolved.","confidence":"HIGH"}