{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C049","selector_replication":2,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":82,"causal_archetype_fit":81,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":65,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":82,"adopter_partner_path":76,"deployability_complexity":58,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":67,"empirical_partner_potential":80,"scrutiny_priority":72,"biggest_visible_risk":"The observance could become a ceremonial substitute for enforceable recovery, compensation, staffing, and workload reform while falsely signaling that exceptional close work has ended.","rationale":"The fatigue, residual-work, and false-closure problem is consequential, and the proposal carefully separates symbolic release from accounting authority. Its synthetic comparison is safe and decision-relevant. However, much of the desired outcome is directly addressable through status rules, task governance, and enforceable workforce policies, leaving the ritual's incremental causal contribution uncertain and potentially burdensome."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":94,"causal_archetype_fit":86,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":68,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":91,"deployability_complexity":78,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":82,"empirical_partner_potential":94,"scrutiny_priority":90,"biggest_visible_risk":"The token-based cycle may add hierarchy theater to procedures that an anonymous submission channel, disciplined issue tracker, and credible partner follow-through could perform more safely and efficiently.","rationale":"The proposal targets a concrete audit-quality failure with potentially serious consequences and makes the ritual structure causally relevant by redistributing attention, witnessing contradictions, and routing every issue into authorized systems. The counterbalanced synthetic study is unusually bounded, measurable, partner-feasible, and capable of rejecting the intervention. Its main vulnerability is that close procedural rivals may eliminate the incremental value of symbolic enactment."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":88,"causal_archetype_fit":91,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":76,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":86,"deployability_complexity":68,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":84,"empirical_partner_potential":89,"scrutiny_priority":87,"biggest_visible_risk":"A vivid reenactment can freeze a selective origin story, sanctify an obsolete control, or convert disputed organizational history into an authoritative myth.","rationale":"Loss of control provenance across turnover is structurally credible, and reenactment, card circulation, reciprocal exchange, and lineage handoff are integral rather than decorative. The synthetic test can measure retained causal understanding, authority recognition, and workflow-ready outputs against a written baseline. The proposal is somewhat elaborate and must show that enactment outperforms case-based training and documentation without introducing narrative distortion."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":96,"causal_archetype_fit":83,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":69,"operational_specificity":93,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":88,"deployability_complexity":65,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":76,"empirical_partner_potential":91,"scrutiny_priority":84,"biggest_visible_risk":"Collective boundary mapping may create false assurance or expose sensitive conflict information in an area where confidential, rule-governed individual review is essential.","rationale":"Auditor independence is highly consequential, and representing absent users while explicitly naming commercial incentives gives the archetype a plausible causal role. The mock-workflow comparison is bounded and can test identification, routing, authority confusion, and disclosure safety. Nevertheless, established confirmation, consultation, incentive, and acceptance controls are very strong rivals, while the public ritual layer carries unusual privacy and false-consensus hazards."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_A"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_B","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually specific, reversible, and testable, but their principal shared vulnerability is symbolic duplication of ordinary governance. B and C deserve first scrutiny because their ritual mechanisms are most tightly coupled to observable information-flow or memory failures; D offers a strong partner study but faces greater confidentiality and false-assurance risk, while A depends most heavily on material workforce policies outside the observance.","confidence":"HIGH"}