{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C050","selector_replication":1,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":82,"causal_archetype_fit":78,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":72,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":86,"adopter_partner_path":77,"deployability_complexity":68,"authority_safety_reversibility":90,"strict_potential":74,"empirical_partner_potential":82,"scrutiny_priority":78,"biggest_visible_risk":"The observance may aestheticize community distress and become symbolic acknowledgment that substitutes for mitigation, resources, or authorized action.","rationale":"The proposal targets a credible continuity and accountability failure that ordinary acoustic data and public-comment records do not necessarily resolve. Its paired histories, explicit commitment decision, and ledger closure give the ritual a plausible causal role beyond atmosphere. The fictional-commitment rehearsal is bounded, reversible, and contrastive, though real deployment requires difficult representational legitimacy and could still be matched by a disciplined forum plus action ledger."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":77,"causal_archetype_fit":58,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":55,"operational_specificity":90,"falsifiability_test_quality":85,"adopter_partner_path":72,"deployability_complexity":73,"authority_safety_reversibility":91,"strict_potential":61,"empirical_partner_potential":74,"scrutiny_priority":65,"biggest_visible_risk":"Ceremonial card transfers and pledges may be confused with technical concurrence or pressure disciplines to affirm allocations they dispute.","rationale":"Cross-disciplinary margin dependencies are consequential and the rehearsal is unusually well bounded, specific, and measurable. However, dependency traceability, interface reviews, dashboards, and change-control processes appear capable of carrying most of the proposed information and accountability. The ritual layer therefore looks less causally essential, with workplace hierarchy creating added assent and shaming risks."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":87,"causal_archetype_fit":66,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":59,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":86,"adopter_partner_path":81,"deployability_complexity":84,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":68,"empirical_partner_potential":84,"scrutiny_priority":75,"biggest_visible_risk":"The ritual may add solemnity and status confusion to an anomaly that would be handled as effectively by stricter tracker fields and an ordinary cross-disciplinary handoff.","rationale":"Loss of anomaly meaning across configuration and personnel turnover is concrete and potentially consequential. The fifteen-minute scope, non-operational rehearsal, explicit authority exclusions, rollback, and comprehension test make this the easiest proposal to test safely with a partner. Its weakness is causal distinctiveness: most operational closure comes from mandatory tracker completeness, while the witnessed commitment could become redundant or coercive."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":93,"causal_archetype_fit":84,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":76,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":88,"adopter_partner_path":85,"deployability_complexity":77,"authority_safety_reversibility":92,"strict_potential":82,"empirical_partner_potential":90,"scrutiny_priority":89,"biggest_visible_risk":"Visible cross-company harmony may mask weak anti-retaliation protection while contractors or junior workers remain unable to invoke stop-work authority safely in practice.","rationale":"The cross-employer legitimacy gap is real, consequential, and not fully addressed by separate employer policies. Here the archetype is comparatively causal: reciprocal witnessing, frontline voice, exchanged support commitments, and rotating stewardship address a social-recognition problem spanning contractual boundaries. The classroom rehearsal is authorized, reversible, decision-relevant, and directly compared with a joint briefing, although procedural confusion and power asymmetry require close scrutiny."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_B"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_D","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are exceptionally bounded and testable but derive much of their practical value from ordinary record-completeness and action-routing requirements. D offers the strongest case that ritual enactment itself addresses an interorganizational legitimacy mechanism; A offers a plausible plural-memory mechanism; C and especially B are more vulnerable to being disciplined handoff or review practices with ceremonial additions.","confidence":"HIGH"}