{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C050","selector_replication":3,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":89,"causal_archetype_fit":68,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":51,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":88,"adopter_partner_path":82,"deployability_complexity":86,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":66,"empirical_partner_potential":80,"scrutiny_priority":75,"biggest_visible_risk":"The ceremonial card and public commitment may add coercive symbolism without improving continuity beyond a complete tracker and disciplined handoff.","rationale":"The turnover-driven loss of anomaly meaning is consequential, and the proposal tightly bounds authority, participation, rollback, and record closure. Its matched reconstruction test can reject the intervention. However, most operational benefit appears to come from requiring owners, evidence actions, dates, dependencies, and escalation routes—features available to its nearest procedural rivals—so the ritual's essential incremental mechanism is vulnerable."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":86,"causal_archetype_fit":87,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":68,"operational_specificity":88,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":70,"deployability_complexity":62,"authority_safety_reversibility":88,"strict_potential":73,"empirical_partner_potential":84,"scrutiny_priority":82,"biggest_visible_risk":"The observance could aestheticize residents' distress and create apparent accountability where participating institutions lack authority or resources to act.","rationale":"Plural memory, acknowledgment, and visible renewal of commitments are closely aligned with the archetype rather than merely appended to an administrative process. Paired histories, recorded disagreement, explicit authority boundaries, and comparison with a conventional ledger review make the claim unusually testable. The main constraint is the difficult partner coalition: community legitimacy, sensory consent, representation, and multiple aviation authorities must all be managed before a credible study."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":84,"causal_archetype_fit":58,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":44,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":89,"adopter_partner_path":79,"deployability_complexity":82,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":58,"empirical_partner_potential":74,"scrutiny_priority":66,"biggest_visible_risk":"Ritualized stewardship may be mistaken for engineering concurrence or pressure disciplines to perform unity around legitimately disputed allocations.","rationale":"Cross-disciplinary margin dependencies are real and important, and the fictional-case comparison is bounded, reversible, and capable of exposing failure. Yet dependency cards, protected responses, assigned owners, and decision routing resemble functions of strong integration and interface reviews; the aircraft-outline symbolism and shared formula contribute less clearly to the causal effect. This leaves the contrastive claim particularly exposed to a matched conventional review."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":93,"causal_archetype_fit":82,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":62,"operational_specificity":90,"falsifiability_test_quality":88,"adopter_partner_path":80,"deployability_complexity":78,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":76,"empirical_partner_potential":89,"scrutiny_priority":87,"biggest_visible_risk":"Visible cross-employer affirmation could mask weak anti-retaliation protection and increase the exposure of junior contractor personnel who later invoke stop-work authority.","rationale":"The cross-company recognition gap is concrete, consequential, and not fully addressed by employer-specific rules. Reciprocal exchange, frontline response turns, rotating stewardship, and explicit transfer of unsupported promises make the archetype causally relevant to interorganizational legitimacy. The non-operational rehearsal is safe and decision-relevant, with clear comparison against a joint briefing, although credible anti-retaliation enforcement and communication infrastructure remain powerful rivals."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_C"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_D","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually bounded and testable, but their decisive separation is whether ceremonial enactment addresses a genuinely social legitimacy or memory mechanism rather than decorating record discipline. D and B have the strongest archetype-dependent claims; A and especially C derive much of their likely benefit from conventional completeness, handoff, or integration controls.","confidence":"HIGH"}