{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C053","selector_replication":3,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":85,"causal_archetype_fit":69,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":61,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":90,"deployability_complexity":88,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":78,"empirical_partner_potential":90,"scrutiny_priority":82,"biggest_visible_risk":"The marked muster may add ceremony and visibility pressure without outperforming a well-run responsibility matrix and structured handoff checklist.","rationale":"Continuity failures across seasonal turnover are concrete and consequential, and the proposal tightly connects the pilot to existing operational controls with excellent rollback and decision-changing tests. Its weakness is causal necessity: named owners, backups, resources, credentials, and tacit-knowledge transfers are largely administrative functions, so the ritual layer may prove decorative or resemble familiar kickoff and handoff practice."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":92,"causal_archetype_fit":81,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":74,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":92,"deployability_complexity":81,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":85,"empirical_partner_potential":94,"scrutiny_priority":90,"biggest_visible_risk":"A compelling visual and verbal performance could manufacture perceived coherence or consensus while adding little beyond rigorous reconciliation and editorial review.","rationale":"Boundary loss during multidisciplinary synthesis is a serious, observable problem, and the intervention targets the social salience and ownership of limitations rather than claiming to solve technical reconciliation. The fictional-packet comparison is unusually bounded and capable of changing the adoption decision. Prior scrutiny must determine whether collective witnessing has a meaningful residual effect beyond structured boundary ledgers, validators, and ordinary review."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":89,"causal_archetype_fit":93,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":84,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":90,"deployability_complexity":84,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":92,"empirical_partner_potential":93,"scrutiny_priority":94,"biggest_visible_risk":"The assembly could sanctify a predetermined retirement decision, stigmatize a superseded team, or privilege the successor before migration costs and limitations are understood.","rationale":"The proposal identifies a credible gap between technical deprecation and socially effective retirement: ambiguous use boundaries, founder-held support, professional identity, and untransferred migration duties. The retirement archetype is causally central rather than ornamental, while catalog authority, preservation, redirects, exceptions, and rollback remain operationally separated. Its staged fictional and already-authorized-package tests are specific and falsifiable."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":95,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":80,"operational_specificity":90,"falsifiability_test_quality":86,"adopter_partner_path":78,"deployability_complexity":61,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":82,"empirical_partner_potential":84,"scrutiny_priority":86,"biggest_visible_risk":"Even with opt-outs and review, collective witnessing after ecological loss may intensify distress, compel visibility, or let emotional solidarity pressure participants into unsupported obligations.","rationale":"The problem is highly consequential, and collective witnessing fits the split between technical loss records, affected relationships, grief, and continuing obligation. The proposal carefully separates verified facts, symbolism, attribution, and managerial authority. However, real deployment is timing-sensitive and ethically complex, while the most important benefits are harder to isolate from incident review, consultation, restoration planning, and support processes."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_A"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_C","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually specific, reversible, and testable. The main discriminator is whether the archetype supplies a necessary causal function beyond strong ordinary governance: retirement and post-loss witnessing show the clearest fit, carbon-boundary synthesis offers the cleanest partner experiment, and seasonal handoff is most vulnerable to being absorbed by standard administrative practice.","confidence":"HIGH"}