{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C054","selector_replication":3,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":96,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":76,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":93,"adopter_partner_path":92,"deployability_complexity":88,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":87,"empirical_partner_potential":95,"scrutiny_priority":93,"biggest_visible_risk":"The rehearsal could become management-controlled safety theater, exposing junior callers to informal retaliation while creating unwarranted confidence that real stops will be honored.","rationale":"This addresses a consequential, observable cross-rank coordination problem, and the archetype is causally central: a low-status worker must visibly invoke the actual stop signal and receive coordinated recognition. The equipment-idle pilot is bounded, authorized, reversible, and capable of revealing incompatible responses or retaliation pressure. Its main scrutiny vulnerability is resemblance to stop-work drills and toolbox practices, but its rotating caller, authority recognition, and later-conduct audit preserve a meaningful contrastive claim."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":90,"causal_archetype_fit":85,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":72,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":90,"deployability_complexity":84,"authority_safety_reversibility":92,"strict_potential":82,"empirical_partner_potential":92,"scrutiny_priority":89,"biggest_visible_risk":"The observance may provide ethical reassurance while ordinary consent, clearance, and editorial systems remain incomplete, and its shared recognition process could expose sensitive contributor information.","rationale":"Scattered contributor obligations and editorial turnover form a credible, important problem with measurable ownership and retrieval failures. The two-milestone study directly tests whether governed renewal improves traceability and disposition. Collective witnessing is relevant, although databases, checklists, and an empowered liaison could plausibly provide much of the function, making the distinctive incremental effect a key scrutiny question."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":83,"causal_archetype_fit":75,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":64,"operational_specificity":90,"falsifiability_test_quality":88,"adopter_partner_path":85,"deployability_complexity":80,"authority_safety_reversibility":91,"strict_potential":72,"empirical_partner_potential":86,"scrutiny_priority":81,"biggest_visible_risk":"Workers may reasonably interpret provisional public recognition as a credit promise or material remedy, while hierarchy and witness error distort whose labor is remembered.","rationale":"Credit-memory failures across temporary production phases are concrete and partner-testable, and the proposal carefully separates recognition from binding credit decisions. However, reconciliation systems, correction channels, and departmental sign-off appear capable of addressing much of the objective without ceremony. The pilot can still determine whether consent-aware cross-department witnessing adds usable provenance and survives handoff, supporting a solid empirical-partner lane."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":77,"causal_archetype_fit":71,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":59,"operational_specificity":88,"falsifiability_test_quality":83,"adopter_partner_path":82,"deployability_complexity":81,"authority_safety_reversibility":89,"strict_potential":64,"empirical_partner_potential":81,"scrutiny_priority":74,"biggest_visible_risk":"Reenacting and collectively synthesizing a motif may canonize the creative lead's interpretation, narrowing productive ambiguity and making dissent professionally costly.","rationale":"Meaning drift across distributed production is plausible, and the bounded before-and-after study could reveal whether personnel share provenance, ambiguity, and current craft implications. Yet the intervention overlaps strongly in function with story bibles, table reads, continuity work, department meetings, and consultant review. Outcomes are also partly interpretive, so it may be difficult to show that ritual enactment rather than structured creative coordination is the essential cause."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_D"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_A","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually bounded and safety-conscious, so the main separator is whether collective enactment is causally necessary rather than an embellished meeting or record system. A has the clearest consequential behavioral gap and decisive field test; B also offers a strong longitudinal partner study. C and especially D are more vulnerable to functional substitution by ordinary administrative or creative workflows.","confidence":"HIGH"}