{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C057","selector_replication":1,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":78,"causal_archetype_fit":74,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":67,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":82,"deployability_complexity":84,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":77,"empirical_partner_potential":84,"scrutiny_priority":80,"biggest_visible_risk":"The same ownership clarity may be produced by a well-run, non-symbolic obligation review, leaving the ritual layer decorative while adding social pressure or false confidence.","rationale":"The proposal targets a consequential turnover and stewardship failure, sharply separates ceremony from mathematical certification, and offers a bounded matched-baseline test with strong rollback rules. Its principal vulnerability is causal necessity: most operational benefit comes from the dependency ledger, distributed turns, explicit ownership, and follow-up, all of which could survive removal of the marked rite."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":73,"causal_archetype_fit":82,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":61,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":93,"adopter_partner_path":92,"deployability_complexity":91,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":84,"empirical_partner_potential":91,"scrutiny_priority":87,"biggest_visible_risk":"The assembly may be indistinguishable in function from established embodied instruction or an ordinary dependency-map exercise with equitable participation.","rationale":"This is the cleanest bounded deployment: one instructor-authorized, ungraded transition, reversible materials, accessible participation paths, and a fresh task that directly tests whether students distinguish falsity from underivability. The archetype is causally plausible because a marked changeover embodies formal-context change, but the remaining contrastive claim is vulnerable to close instructional rivals and the problem's consequence is less severe than in the doctoral-governance proposal."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":82,"causal_archetype_fit":79,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":69,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":89,"adopter_partner_path":84,"deployability_complexity":82,"authority_safety_reversibility":91,"strict_potential":80,"empirical_partner_potential":85,"scrutiny_priority":83,"biggest_visible_risk":"Publicly enacted retirement may stigmatize contributors and create social resistance to legitimate reopening while adding little beyond a technical briefing and correction checklist.","rationale":"The post-verdict gap between formal status and distributed records is credible, and the proposal carefully reserves truth decisions to ordinary review. It has concrete archival outputs, owners, deadlines, and an auditable pilot. The symbolic discharge fits the need for shared release and preservation, but operational success may be attributable chiefly to the checklist, while ceremonial finality introduces reputational and epistemic costs."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":92,"causal_archetype_fit":85,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":66,"operational_specificity":93,"falsifiability_test_quality":90,"adopter_partner_path":80,"deployability_complexity":70,"authority_safety_reversibility":87,"strict_potential":80,"empirical_partner_potential":93,"scrutiny_priority":89,"biggest_visible_risk":"Advisor power may make every nominally optional path consequential in practice, so the assembly could become evaluation theater despite independent facilitation and formal safeguards.","rationale":"The proposal addresses a serious, structurally credible default-continuation problem and makes the ritual form causally relevant by legitimizing release at a marked boundary while requiring reciprocal support commitments. Its decisive uncertainty—whether the student experiences real choice and can later revise without penalty—is partner-resolvable through the tightly bounded pilot. Strong controls reduce but cannot eliminate informal retaliation, path stigma, confidentiality, and lock-in risks."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_A"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_D","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually specific, reversible, and falsifiable; their common vulnerability is that the operational core may be reproduced by a structured non-symbolic meeting or checklist. D merits first scrutiny for consequence and partner-resolvable uncertainty, B for the strongest low-risk strict test, while C and A face a sharper challenge showing that ritual adds function beyond record correction or obligation management.","confidence":"HIGH"}