{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C057","selector_replication":2,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":84,"causal_archetype_fit":85,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":86,"operational_specificity":93,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":76,"deployability_complexity":81,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":85,"empirical_partner_potential":83,"scrutiny_priority":85,"biggest_visible_risk":"The carefully governed rite may add no function beyond a well-run, non-symbolic obligation review using the same ledger, turn allocation, opt-outs, and follow-up.","rationale":"The proposal addresses a consequential and observable turnover failure while sharply separating stewardship from proof certification. Its one-obligation pilot, explicit authority limits, rollback, matched baseline, and decision-relevant measures are unusually bounded. The main uncertainty is whether marked enactment is causally necessary rather than an elaborate wrapper around sound proof-management practice."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":77,"causal_archetype_fit":90,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":79,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":86,"adopter_partner_path":71,"deployability_complexity":78,"authority_safety_reversibility":92,"strict_potential":78,"empirical_partner_potential":79,"scrutiny_priority":78,"biggest_visible_risk":"Ceremonial retirement could stigmatize contributors and create socially resistant finality even though the mathematical status is formally reopenable.","rationale":"Retirement, preservation, recognition, and handoff are strongly aligned with the archetype, and the proposal keeps technical adjudication outside the ceremony. It specifies concrete record corrections and a bounded audit. However, much of the observable problem may be solved by ordinary deprecation and archival procedures, eligible events may be infrequent, and the claimed social benefit must outweigh blame and lock-in risks."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":93,"causal_archetype_fit":89,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":85,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":90,"adopter_partner_path":80,"deployability_complexity":71,"authority_safety_reversibility":84,"strict_potential":83,"empirical_partner_potential":93,"scrutiny_priority":90,"biggest_visible_risk":"Advisor control over funding, evaluation, authorship, and future treatment may make an ostensibly voluntary path choice unsafe despite independent facilitation and formal nonretaliation rules.","rationale":"This is the most consequential structural problem and the strongest empirical-partner opportunity. The marked renewal makes continuation nondefault, while separate support commitments expose institutional obligations rather than placing responsibility solely on the student. The private pilot, student-controlled record, immediate pressure measures, and four-week follow-up can resolve the decisive uncertainty, although persistent supervisory power limits strict confidence."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":71,"causal_archetype_fit":77,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":65,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":91,"deployability_complexity":93,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":75,"empirical_partner_potential":87,"scrutiny_priority":77,"biggest_visible_risk":"The ritualized card changeover may be functionally indistinguishable from a familiar dependency-map or active-learning exercise with the same mathematical content.","rationale":"The proposal is exceptionally safe, deployable, and testable: one instructor can run an ungraded pilot and use a fresh task that directly detects axiom-import errors. Its weakness is contrastiveness. The essential causal work appears to come from explicit dependency visualization, distributed participation, and follow-up instruction, while the marked ritual layer may be decorative and especially vulnerable to known-looking instructional rivals."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_D"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_C","portfolio_observation":"C and A best combine a consequential ownership problem with a bounded study capable of separating symbolic renewal from improved administration. B has the strongest intrinsic retirement-ritual fit but a narrower adoption path and material finality risk. D is the easiest and safest experiment, yet its remaining contrastive claim is most vulnerable because ordinary active-learning and dependency-map methods appear to perform most of the causal work.","confidence":"HIGH"}