{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C057","selector_replication":3,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":85,"causal_archetype_fit":82,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":66,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":86,"adopter_partner_path":78,"deployability_complexity":72,"authority_safety_reversibility":91,"strict_potential":78,"empirical_partner_potential":84,"scrutiny_priority":82,"biggest_visible_risk":"The marked choice may amplify supervisory pressure and stigmatize release even when participation is formally optional.","rationale":"The default persistence of a doctoral problem under advisor power is consequential, and a separately legitimate renewal occasion plausibly changes what can be voiced. The pilot is bounded, reversible, operationally detailed, and directly compared with non-symbolic planning. Its vulnerability is that independent facilitation, explicit alternatives, and reciprocal commitments may do all the causal work, leaving the ritual layer unnecessary or psychologically locking."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":76,"causal_archetype_fit":68,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":51,"operational_specificity":90,"falsifiability_test_quality":88,"adopter_partner_path":90,"deployability_complexity":89,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":65,"empirical_partner_potential":86,"scrutiny_priority":73,"biggest_visible_risk":"The assembly may be functionally indistinguishable from a well-designed dependency-map lesson with distributed participation.","rationale":"Illicit transfer of conclusions between axiom systems is a clear instructional problem, and the proposed classroom pilot is unusually easy, safe, and decision-relevant to test. However, the essential mechanism appears to be explicit dependency visualization and active learning; threshold gestures, circulation, and synchronized turning may be decorative. The proposal is therefore strong for a partner study but vulnerable to familiar pedagogical prior art and a weak remaining ritual-specific claim."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":83,"causal_archetype_fit":75,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":61,"operational_specificity":89,"falsifiability_test_quality":84,"adopter_partner_path":79,"deployability_complexity":81,"authority_safety_reversibility":92,"strict_potential":71,"empirical_partner_potential":81,"scrutiny_priority":76,"biggest_visible_risk":"A structured obligation-review meeting and maintained issue ledger may provide the same ownership renewal without ceremonial pressure or ambiguity about proof status.","rationale":"Ownership decay in long-lived distributed proofs is credible and consequential, especially during turnover. The proposal carefully separates stewardship from mathematical certification and produces concrete ledger outputs with a bounded comparison. Yet most practical value may come from speaking-order rules, explicit re-consent, and disciplined task tracking; the marked rite risks implying collective confidence while adding little beyond ordinary proof governance."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":88,"causal_archetype_fit":87,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":74,"operational_specificity":93,"falsifiability_test_quality":88,"adopter_partner_path":88,"deployability_complexity":84,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":85,"empirical_partner_potential":89,"scrutiny_priority":90,"biggest_visible_risk":"Publicly enacted retirement may create blame and excessive finality, discouraging legitimate reformulation or reopening.","rationale":"This proposal gives the archetype a causally coherent job: making an already-authorized status change socially legible while releasing commitments, preserving residue, recognizing contributors, and coordinating downstream correction. It sharply separates technical adjudication from the observance, specifies safe authority boundaries, and ties closure to auditable artifacts and notices. Checklists, postmortems, and technical briefings are strong rivals, but the combined claim about symbolic discharge, contributor dignity, shared memory, and operational handoff remains meaningful and readily testable."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_B"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_D","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are operationally mature and unusually safety-conscious, but each faces the same decisive scrutiny question: whether the ritual form adds causal value beyond structured meetings, visual exercises, ledgers, or checklists carrying identical governance and follow-through. D has the strongest archetype-essential social transition; A has the most consequential power-sensitive renewal problem; C and especially B are more vulnerable to ordinary-process equivalents.","confidence":"HIGH"}