{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C059","selector_replication":2,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":86,"causal_archetype_fit":82,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":67,"operational_specificity":90,"falsifiability_test_quality":87,"adopter_partner_path":78,"deployability_complexity":69,"authority_safety_reversibility":91,"strict_potential":77,"empirical_partner_potential":84,"scrutiny_priority":79,"biggest_visible_risk":"The ritual layer may add coercive or appropriative theater without improving on a provenance register and publication gates.","rationale":"The turnover and lost-obligation problem is consequential, observable, and paired with unusually concrete permissions, ownership, checkpoints, and rollback. The pilot can change a decision by comparing traceability and refusal costs against baseline practice. Scrutiny should focus on whether witnessed reenactment is causally necessary rather than a burdensome wrapper around documentation and enforcement."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":88,"causal_archetype_fit":88,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":72,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":89,"adopter_partner_path":81,"deployability_complexity":72,"authority_safety_reversibility":92,"strict_potential":83,"empirical_partner_potential":87,"scrutiny_priority":85,"biggest_visible_risk":"A structured issue log, dissent appendix, and ordinary steward handoff may reproduce the claimed benefits with less identity pressure.","rationale":"The proposal tightly links recurring witnessed nonagreement to a genuine editorial failure: provisional language becoming false consensus across turnover. Its states, publication consequences, authority boundaries, artifact checks, and low-stakes pilot are specific and falsifiable. The archetype is more causally integrated than in most candidates, although scrutiny must test whether the symbolic cycle adds anything beyond excellent pluralistic editorial governance."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":93,"causal_archetype_fit":84,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":75,"operational_specificity":89,"falsifiability_test_quality":85,"adopter_partner_path":70,"deployability_complexity":57,"authority_safety_reversibility":89,"strict_potential":73,"empirical_partner_potential":79,"scrutiny_priority":75,"biggest_visible_risk":"The assembly may instrumentalize grief and visibility, exposing custodians while skewing resources toward losses that perform well ceremonially.","rationale":"Archival loss and repeated custodial burden are highly consequential, and delayed acceptance, layered disclosure, and funded work orders are strong safeguards. The decisive uncertainties are partner-testable, but real deployment requires unusually sensitive authority, emotional safety, resource allocation, and information controls. The operational value may also come chiefly from preservation governance and work-order conversion rather than the assembly itself."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":89,"causal_archetype_fit":86,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":73,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":89,"deployability_complexity":82,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":86,"empirical_partner_potential":91,"scrutiny_priority":89,"biggest_visible_risk":"Ceremonial retirement could become a factional purge or reputational punishment disguised as methodological governance.","rationale":"This has the clearest bounded adopter, authority, artifact scope, status taxonomy, and downstream implementation path. A low-stakes consortium-owned teaching label permits an authorized study with objective artifact and comprehension checks, while reversal remains credible. Standard deprecation practice is a formidable rival, but the proposal states a meaningful contrastive claim about socially withdrawing inherited authorization and offers a clean test of whether that layer adds value."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_C"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_D","portfolio_observation":"All four are unusually operational and safety-conscious, but each is vulnerable to the same prior-art challenge: ordinary records, gates, handoffs, and governance may deliver most benefits without ritualization. D and B deserve first scrutiny because their owned artifacts, bounded statuses, and near-term partner tests make that contrast easiest to resolve; C addresses the gravest loss but carries the highest deployment and symbolic-harm burden.","confidence":"HIGH"}