{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C060","selector_replication":1,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":92,"causal_archetype_fit":88,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":79,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":87,"deployability_complexity":76,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":86,"empirical_partner_potential":91,"scrutiny_priority":89,"biggest_visible_risk":"The elaborate assembly may add little beyond a sunset rule, closure checklist, and carefully facilitated service-transition process.","rationale":"The proposal addresses consequential false-readiness, coerced volunteering, and unclear custody with unusually explicit authority boundaries and a reversible tabletop-to-noncritical-pilot path. Ritualized release is causally plausible because social identity and witnessed recognition may enable exits that administrative closure alone cannot, while the audit tests whether operational transfers actually occur."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":82,"causal_archetype_fit":70,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":58,"operational_specificity":89,"falsifiability_test_quality":90,"adopter_partner_path":86,"deployability_complexity":85,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":65,"empirical_partner_potential":85,"scrutiny_priority":72,"biggest_visible_risk":"The intervention closely resembles a well-facilitated negative-case review with symbolic staging that may be causally decorative.","rationale":"Category hardening is credible, and the proposal offers a safe, bounded pilot with decision-changing artifact checks. Its main weakness is contrastive: versioned codebooks, deviant-case analysis, and ordinary methodological review plausibly supply nearly all operative mechanisms, leaving marked reopening and witnessing with a relatively narrow incremental claim."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":90,"causal_archetype_fit":83,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":70,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":90,"deployability_complexity":81,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":79,"empirical_partner_potential":92,"scrutiny_priority":85,"biggest_visible_risk":"A consolidated obligations register and authorized joint review may deliver the same continuity and accountability without ritualization.","rationale":"Turnover-driven loss of reciprocal obligations is important and structurally credible, with a clear partner, bounded obligations, measurable follow-through, and strong safeguards against coerced assent or unauthorized promises. Witnessed renewal plausibly matters where relationship legitimacy must be re-chosen, though its distinct contribution beyond governance and recordkeeping remains vulnerable."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":84,"causal_archetype_fit":90,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":75,"operational_specificity":90,"falsifiability_test_quality":88,"adopter_partner_path":79,"deployability_complexity":68,"authority_safety_reversibility":91,"strict_potential":76,"empirical_partner_potential":82,"scrutiny_priority":79,"biggest_visible_risk":"Narrative selection and ritualized commemoration may intensify nostalgia, exposure, or representational capture while adding little beyond plural oral-history and archive practice.","rationale":"The embodied, witnessed transmission and stewardship handoff make the archetype unusually central, and the proposal carefully accommodates nonwalking participation, permissions, withdrawal, and contested accounts. Scrutiny value is tempered by demanding stakeholder coordination, substantial disclosure and trauma risks, and a contrastive claim that may collapse into an accessible plural tour plus permission-aware archival governance."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_B"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_A","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually specific, reversible, and falsifiable; the principal discriminator is whether witnessed symbolic enactment supplies a causal function beyond strong administrative practice. A and C pair consequential operational failures with credible partner studies, D has the strongest intrinsic ritual fit but greater coordination and harm exposure, and B faces the clearest standard-method rival.","confidence":"HIGH"}