{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C060","selector_replication":2,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":86,"causal_archetype_fit":88,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":72,"operational_specificity":93,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":83,"deployability_complexity":72,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":79,"empirical_partner_potential":88,"scrutiny_priority":85,"biggest_visible_risk":"The observance may add emotionally charged ritualization without improving on a permission-aware oral-history archive and well-facilitated plural walking tour.","rationale":"The proposal addresses consequential narrator turnover, selective commemoration, weak permissions, and failed stewardship transfer with unusually concrete governance, reversible pilots, and decision-relevant comparisons. Ritual form is plausibly causal because witnessed plural recognition, marked incompleteness, and stewardship handoff are central rather than decorative. Its main scrutiny question is whether those elements create durable value beyond strong archival and public-history practice."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":94,"causal_archetype_fit":91,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":78,"operational_specificity":96,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":92,"deployability_complexity":82,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":87,"empirical_partner_potential":95,"scrutiny_priority":94,"biggest_visible_risk":"Ceremonial closure could be mistaken for safe operational discharge, causing residents to lose support while debts, custody, or transition duties remain unresolved.","rationale":"False readiness, indefinite volunteer obligation, and unclear custody are concrete, consequential problems. The renewal-and-release archetype is causally relevant to the social legitimacy that ordinary checklists may not settle, while the proposal carefully separates symbolic disposition from authorized operational action. A single noncritical function offers a strong partner study with observable notices, rosters, credentials, funds, referrals, and refusal outcomes."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":88,"causal_archetype_fit":82,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":66,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":90,"adopter_partner_path":80,"deployability_complexity":75,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":72,"empirical_partner_potential":85,"scrutiny_priority":79,"biggest_visible_risk":"A consolidated obligations register and facilitated joint review may deliver the same accountability with less coercive or legitimating symbolism.","rationale":"Reciprocal obligations disappearing across research turnover is credible and important, and the proposal provides bounded authority, refusal paths, operational conversion, and a clean comparative pilot. The observance may improve witnessed re-choosing, but its distinctive causal contribution is less secure because registers, advisory-board reviews, re-consent, MOUs, and audits closely approximate most functions."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":82,"causal_archetype_fit":74,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":58,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":87,"deployability_complexity":86,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":65,"empirical_partner_potential":88,"scrutiny_priority":78,"biggest_visible_risk":"The assembly may become a performance of reflexivity that adds ceremony but no epistemic benefit beyond disciplined negative-case analysis and versioned codebook governance.","rationale":"Category hardening and loss of resistant observations are credible, and the pilot has excellent artifact-level outcomes, low-risk rehearsal, and a straightforward research-team partner. However, the archetype appears less causally essential than in the stronger candidates: ordinary negative-case review, methodological witnessing, and version control could reproduce nearly the entire intervention, leaving the marked ritual vulnerable to being decorative or epistemically distorting."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_D"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_B","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually specific, safe, and falsifiable; the principal differentiator is whether ritualized enactment contributes causally beyond strong ordinary governance. B has the best combination of consequential operational stakes, essential social release, measurable traces, and partner-ready testing. A retains a stronger distinctive ritual case than C or D, while C and especially D face close nonritual substitutes.","confidence":"HIGH"}