{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp09_archetype_breadth150_20260804","research_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp09_light_prior_art_20260804","cell_id":"pareto_frontier_navigation__chemistry_materials","search_lanes":{"direct_problem_and_intervention":{"queries":["solid polymer electrolyte multi-objective optimization Pareto frontier ionic conductivity mechanical strength","\"solid polymer electrolytes\" \"Pareto\"","\"polymer electrolyte\" \"multi-objective\" optimization conductivity mechanical"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"],"no_result_note":null},"synonyms_and_historical_terms":{"queries":["polymer electrolyte trade-off ion conducting mechanical properties","solid polymer electrolyte multi-criteria formulation selection","epsilon Pareto polymer materials uncertainty"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC3"],"no_result_note":null},"products_practices_and_standards":{"queries":["materials selection Pareto dominance uncertainty standard","official risk assessment techniques decisions uncertainty verification validation","IEC 31010 multi criteria decision analysis uncertainty"],"source_ids":["SRC3","SRC4"],"no_result_note":null},"component_combination":{"queries":["robust Pareto dominance uncertainty intervals materials selection","multiobjective polymer design discard dominated candidates uncertainty tolerance","battery electrolyte formulation multi-objective Bayesian optimization"],"source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"no_result_note":null}},"sources":[{"source_id":"SRC1","title":"Ionic Conduction in Polymer-Based Solid Electrolytes","publisher":"Advanced Science / Wiley-VCH","url":"https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10074084/","source_type":"SECONDARY_RESEARCH","claims_supported":["Polymer-based solid electrolytes have coupled conductivity, mechanical, interfacial, cost, processability, and safety considerations.","Plasticizers can improve ion transport while causing liquid-like mechanical behavior, and high conductivity commonly conflicts with mechanical strength.","Polymer, salt, plasticizer, and filler choices affect electrolyte behavior through interacting mechanisms."]},{"source_id":"SRC2","title":"Multi-Objective Optimization of Ionic Polymer Electrolytes for High-Voltage Fast-Charging and Versatile Lithium Batteries","publisher":"Department of Macromolecular Science, Fudan University","url":"https://polymer.fudan.edu.cn/07/89/c32872a722825/page.htm","source_type":"OTHER","claims_supported":["A reported ionic-polymer-electrolyte study used multi-objective Bayesian optimization over 504 formulations defined by four composition parameters.","The workflow simultaneously considered ionic conductivity, electrochemical stability window, and cycling performance and experimentally validated selected formulations.","The source directly establishes multi-objective formulation selection as current practice in this electrolyte domain."]},{"source_id":"SRC3","title":"Bias free multiobjective active learning for materials design and discovery","publisher":"Nature Communications","url":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-22437-0","source_type":"PRIMARY_RESEARCH","claims_supported":["Pareto dominance provides only a partial order, while total rankings introduce subjective preferences.","An epsilon-Pareto active-learning method uses uncertainty regions and tolerances to discard confidently dominated polymer candidates and classify likely frontier candidates.","The study addresses multiple polymer properties, incomplete data, measurement uncertainty, and sensitivity to the selected epsilon tolerance."]},{"source_id":"SRC4","title":"IEC 31010:2019 Risk management — Risk assessment techniques","publisher":"International Organization for Standardization","url":"https://www.iso.org/standard/72140.html","source_type":"OFFICIAL_STANDARD","claims_supported":["The standard provides guidance for selecting and applying techniques that support decisions under uncertainty.","It emphasizes planning, implementing, verifying, and validating the use of assessment techniques.","It supports structured uncertainty-aware decision practice but does not prescribe the proposal's electrolyte-specific Pareto workflow."]}],"problem_evidence":{"status":"PARTLY_SUPPORTED","finding":"The sources make the technical problem visible: polymer-electrolyte properties are interdependent, conductivity can conflict with mechanics, and contemporary electrolyte research explicitly uses multi-objective formulation optimization. They do not directly establish the narrower organizational claim that laboratories normally review these properties in fragmented meetings, preserve familiar yet dominated recipes, or lack traceable decision records.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"]},"closest_prior_art":[{"name":"Multi-objective optimization of ionic polymer electrolyte formulations","source_ids":["SRC2"],"overlap":"Directly searches a discrete electrolyte-formulation space across several performance targets and uses a closed-loop multi-objective method to select promising formulations.","remaining_difference":"It searches for new candidates through Bayesian optimization rather than retrospectively screening only completed recipes, and the public summary does not describe predeclared EHS/process vetoes, pairwise elimination provenance, authority-separated final choice, or reopening triggers."},{"name":"Uncertainty-aware epsilon-Pareto screening for polymer discovery","source_ids":["SRC3"],"overlap":"Uses uncertainty bounds and an explicit tolerance to discard confidently dominated polymers, retain uncertain comparisons, and construct an approximate Pareto set without imposing a composite ranking.","remaining_difference":"It concerns simulated dispersant polymers and active-learning experiment selection, not solid-polymer-electrolyte campaign governance; it also lacks the proposed safety/process guardrails, accountable post-frontier choice, signed opportunity-cost record, and retrospective baseline comparison."},{"name":"Structured decision support under uncertainty","source_ids":["SRC4"],"overlap":"Officially establishes planning, application, verification, and validation of techniques used to support uncertain decisions.","remaining_difference":"It is general risk-assessment guidance and does not establish Pareto dominance, electrolyte objectives, laboratory authority allocation, or the proposal's complete recheck protocol."}],"prior_art_disposition":"ADJACENT_PRIOR_ART","contrastive_claim_remaining":"For one completed solid-polymer-electrolyte campaign, adding preregistered noncompensable EHS and process floors, harmonized uncertainty rules, independently reproducible pairwise dominance provenance, and an authority-separated choice with reopening triggers will produce a more stable and auditable shortlist than the archived plot-by-plot review, beyond what domain multi-objective optimization or uncertainty-aware Pareto classification alone provides.","contrastive_claim_falsifier":"The claim is falsified if the archived review already contains materially equivalent guardrails, uncertainty-aware dominance provenance, authority separation, and recheck triggers; or if independent analysts fail to agree on dominance classifications, plausible tolerances or one defensible omitted objective repeatedly reverse the frontier, or the reconstruction does not improve shortlist stability and rationale traceability.","gates":{"adequate_source_search":{"status":"PASS","rationale":"The bounded search covered the direct proposal, domain synonyms and tradeoff terminology, established optimization and decision practices, an official uncertainty-decision standard, and combinations of Pareto screening, polymers, uncertainty, and electrolyte formulations. Exactly four opened sources from four publishers were retained, including primary research and an official standard.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"supported_problem":{"status":"PASS","rationale":"The core technical problem of coupled and competing solid-polymer-electrolyte properties is supported, although the claimed fragmented organizational baseline remains unverified; therefore the evidence is appropriately classified as partly supported.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"]},"distinct_testable_claim":{"status":"PASS","rationale":"After excluding already-established multi-objective electrolyte optimization and uncertainty-aware Pareto screening, the remaining guardrail-first, retrospective, reproducibility-and-authority claim is contrastive and falsifiable against an archived campaign.","source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"bounded_next_test":{"status":"PASS","rationale":"The proposed read-only reconstruction of no more than 20 existing formulations, with preregistered rules, two independent analysts, agreement measurement, sensitivity sweeps, an archived baseline, and explicit halt conditions, is narrow and produces observable pass/fail evidence without new experiments.","source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"no_obvious_safety_or_authority_stop":{"status":"PASS","rationale":"The next test is retrospective and read-only, preserves EHS veto and scale-up feasibility authority, prohibits synthesis, cell testing, procurement, budget changes, and safety declarations, and stops when guardrails or data comparability are disputed.","source_ids":["SRC4"]}},"screen_survival":true,"world_novelty_boundary":"This bounded public-web screen found adjacent domain-specific and methodological prior art but no opened source implementing the complete proposed combination. It cannot establish world novelty, patentability, market size, expert acceptance, realized value, or the absence of additional prior art."}