{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp09_archetype_breadth150_20260804","research_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp09_light_prior_art_20260804","cell_id":"priority_based_admission__chemistry_materials","search_lanes":{"direct_problem_and_intervention":{"queries":["air sensitive metastable samples priority scheduling shared XRD facility rapid access","air sensitive powder diffraction queued order they arrive","rapid access beamtime reserved time urgent sample"],"source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"no_result_note":"No retained source described admission based specifically on a documented sample phase-decay deadline."},"synonyms_and_historical_terms":{"queries":["atmosphere sensitive powder diffraction measurement queue","fast access time-critical beamtime samples","rapid access proposals director discretionary beamtime urgent"],"source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"no_result_note":null},"products_practices_and_standards":{"queries":["shared X-ray diffraction facility urgent sample scheduling policy","synchrotron rapid access reserved beamtime peer review","air-sensitive powder diffraction sealed capillary glovebox official facility"],"source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"no_result_note":null},"component_combination":{"queries":["laboratory instrument scheduling earliest deadline first aging reserved capacity","shared research facility urgent samples priority queue reservation release","reserved fraction beamtime waiting list peer review rapid readiness"],"source_ids":["SRC3","SRC4"],"no_result_note":"Reserved rapid-access capacity, readiness screening, review, waiting lists, and priority scheduling were found, but not the complete combination of sample-specific decay deadlines, automatic last-minute release, and aging of ordinary submissions."}},"sources":[{"source_id":"SRC1","title":"In situ correlation between metastable phase-transformation mechanism and kinetics in a metallic glass","publisher":"Nature Communications","url":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-23028-9","source_type":"PRIMARY_RESEARCH","claims_supported":["Transient metastable phases can form and change on subsecond timescales during materials processing.","The authors report that unwanted phase transformation during cooling can confound ex-situ characterization, supporting the general risk that delay can erase or alter a target material state.","In-situ diffraction is an established alternative that changes the measurement architecture rather than allocating access to a shared ex-situ instrument."]},{"source_id":"SRC2","title":"Air Sensitive Samples - Ug11bm","publisher":"Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory","url":"https://wiki-ext.aps.anl.gov/ug11bm/index.php/Air_Sensitive_Samples","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","claims_supported":["The 11-BM powder-diffraction mail-in service measures atmosphere-sensitive samples and provides glovebox-compatible sealing instructions.","Samples are queued in arrival order, exact measurement dates cannot be scheduled, and users are advised to coordinate shipment timing to reduce waiting.","The guidance identifies a material that decomposes within minutes in air and another whose hydration produces a different diffraction pattern, making state-loss risk visible.","Correct containment and preparation are mandatory, demonstrating that rapid access cannot override sample-readiness and safety constraints."]},{"source_id":"SRC3","title":"Proposal Guide","publisher":"Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource","url":"https://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/ssrl/web/user-services/proposal-submission-procedures","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","claims_supported":["SSRL offers rapid-access proposals for limited beamtime, and some beamlines reserve time for them.","Rapid-access applications require justification and review; ordinary proposals are rated and prioritized for allocation.","Safety concerns must be disclosed and addressed before experiments, supporting a safety-gated admission boundary."]},{"source_id":"SRC4","title":"RAPIDD","publisher":"Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory","url":"https://als.lbl.gov/rapidd/","source_type":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","claims_supported":["A proportion of beamtime—listed as 5% to 15% on participating beamlines—is reserved for rapid-access sample-characterization experiments.","Applicants must address experiment details, safety, rapid need, sample suitability, and readiness.","Rapid-access proposals receive at least two reviews, enter a beamline waiting list, and are scheduled by staff according to score and submission date, sometimes at short notice.","The practice applies to X-ray techniques including WAXS/GISAXS and crystallography, making it close domain prior art for reserved, reviewed, priority-based access."]}],"problem_evidence":{"status":"PARTLY_SUPPORTED","finding":"The problem is visible: official powder-diffraction guidance combines atmosphere-sensitive samples, arrival-order queuing, uncertain measurement timing, and examples of rapid decomposition or phase-altering hydration, while primary research shows that unwanted transformation can make later ex-situ characterization misleading. The retained evidence does not quantify how often stable submissions consume scarce local inert-transfer windows or cause loss of as-synthesized phases.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2"]},"closest_prior_art":[{"name":"Advanced Light Source RAPIDD rapid-access allocation","source_ids":["SRC4"],"overlap":"Reserves an explicit fraction of scarce X-ray beamtime for rapid access, screens readiness and urgency, uses multiple reviewers, maintains beamline waiting lists, and assigns time using documented scores and submission dates.","remaining_difference":"It does not publicly specify priority by independently documented time-to-phase-loss, a two-cycle threshold, automatic release 30 minutes before loading, or waiting-time aging for ordinary samples."},{"name":"SSRL Rapid Access Proposals","source_ids":["SRC3"],"overlap":"Provides a reviewed rapid-access admission route with limited or reserved beamtime, justification requirements, allocation priority, and mandatory safety disclosure.","remaining_difference":"The guidance addresses proposal-level rapid access rather than per-sample decay-window ordering and does not disclose the candidate's release, appeal, rerouting, or starvation safeguards."},{"name":"APS 11-BM atmosphere-sensitive powder-diffraction queue","source_ids":["SRC2"],"overlap":"Presents nearly the proposed baseline in the same measurement domain: atmosphere-sensitive powder samples enter an arrival-order queue without exact measurement scheduling, with staff coordination used to reduce waiting.","remaining_difference":"It relies on containment and informal timing advice rather than evidence-based decay classes or protected priority capacity."},{"name":"In-situ diffraction of transient metastable states","source_ids":["SRC1"],"overlap":"Avoids loss or misidentification of transient material phases by observing transformations in real time.","remaining_difference":"It changes instrumentation and measurement mode rather than governing admission to an existing shared inert-transfer bottleneck."}],"prior_art_disposition":"SUBSTANTIAL_COLLISION","contrastive_claim_remaining":"Beyond established rapid-access programs that reserve a percentage of X-ray facility capacity and apply readiness, review, waiting-list, and priority rules, the remaining falsifiable claim is that sample-specific documented time-to-phase-loss, earliest-deadline ordering, automatic last-minute release, second-scientist classification review, and aging of ordinary submissions improve before-deadline measurement without unacceptable idle capacity or stable-sample deferral.","contrastive_claim_falsifier":"The claim is falsified if an operational diffraction facility already uses this combined sample-level mechanism, or if the bounded shadow replay does not improve the fraction measured before independently recorded state-loss deadlines, produces materially excessive idle holds or P2/P3 deferral, or yields classifications that two reviewers cannot reproduce.","gates":{"adequate_source_search":{"status":"PASS","rationale":"All four required lanes were searched. Exactly four opened sources from four publisher contexts were retained, including primary research and three official facility sources; the sources directly cover transient-state loss, atmosphere-sensitive powder-diffraction queues, rapid access, reserved capacity, review, readiness, and scheduling.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"supported_problem":{"status":"PASS","rationale":"Official and primary sources support the existence of rapidly changing material states, air-sensitive powder-diffraction handling, arrival-order queues, and uncertain measurement timing, although the frequency and local capacity mechanism are not quantified.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2"]},"distinct_testable_claim":{"status":"PASS","rationale":"Despite substantial collision with reserved rapid-access practice, the narrower incremental combination of documented phase-loss deadlines, automatic release, classification review, and queue aging remains operationally defined and falsifiable.","source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"bounded_next_test":{"status":"PASS","rationale":"The proposed eight-week de-identified shadow replay changes no bookings or sample handling and can measure deadline attainment, idle holds, reviewer agreement, reversals, and maximum class-specific deferral against the existing queue.","source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"no_obvious_safety_or_authority_stop":{"status":"PASS","rationale":"The first test is records-based and reversible. Official facility practices confirm that sample readiness, safety disclosure, staff allocation, and review remain controlling; the proposal does not authorize bypassing them.","source_ids":["SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]}},"screen_survival":false,"world_novelty_boundary":"This bounded public-web screen found substantial collision with established X-ray-facility rapid-access programs using reserved capacity, readiness screening, review, waiting lists, and priority allocation. It did not establish whether the narrower decay-deadline, release, appeal, and aging combination exists elsewhere. The screen cannot establish world novelty, patentability, market size, expert acceptance, realized value, or operational feasibility."}