{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp09_archetype_breadth150_20260804","cell_id":"progressive_disclosure__chemistry_materials","arm":"BREADTH_PROBE_ONE_SHOT","candidate_id":"progressive_disclosure__chemistry_materials__P1","proposal_index":1,"version":0,"title":"State-Triggered Layered Batch Record for Air-Sensitive Solid-Electrolyte Synthesis","problem":"Researchers executing air-sensitive solid-electrolyte syntheses must use procedures containing setup requirements, reagent-specific constraints, milling parameters, furnace schedules, sampling instructions, workup steps, analytical criteria, and rare deviation responses. A flat procedure presents most of this detail before it is actionable, while exception instructions may be difficult to retrieve when glovebox atmosphere, temperature, pressure, or elapsed time leaves its permitted range.","actors":["Materials-synthesis researcher executing the batch","Laboratory supervisor or principal investigator who approves the synthesis procedure","Environmental health and safety reviewer who controls mandatory hazard content","Quality or data reviewer examining the completed batch record"],"observable_state":"At the bench, the researcher repeatedly scans or searches a long procedure to locate the current step, skips between the main method and appendices, or relies on memory. Ordinary instructions and rare exceptions have similar visual weight. The relevant response to an out-of-range oxygen, moisture, furnace, pressure, or timing observation becomes visible only if the researcher recognizes the condition and finds the correct section.","consequence":"The researcher may perform a later-stage action prematurely, miss a required observation, choose an unsupported deviation response, expose an air-sensitive intermediate, contaminate the batch, or leave an incomplete record that prevents reviewers from reconstructing what occurred.","affected_objective":"Safe, reproducible execution and traceable documentation of air-sensitive solid-electrolyte synthesis batches.","intervention":"Convert one approved synthesis procedure into a state-triggered layered batch record. Its default layer shows the current material identity, current task stage, required observation, immediate action, and any warning that changes the safe action. A Wizard or Stepper Workflow reveals preparation, charging, milling, heat-treatment, cooling, sampling, and workup instructions as the operator reaches each stage. Just-in-Time Help exposes rationale, examples, instrument-specific details, and analytical assumptions on request. Contextual Warnings override normal staging whenever entered or imported measurements cross procedure-defined risk or deviation conditions. Persistent depth labels, breadcrumbs, a return path, and a Full Access escape hatch preserve access to the complete approved procedure.","structural_mapping":[{"archetype_element":"Current need","domain_realization":"The action and decision required at the researcher’s present synthesis stage."},{"archetype_element":"Information layers","domain_realization":"Immediate action and mandatory warning; stage-specific parameters and recording fields; optional rationale and examples; deviation logic; full approved procedure and audit detail."},{"archetype_element":"Reveal trigger","domain_realization":"Researcher-confirmed stage transitions, requested explanation, entered measurement, elapsed-time condition, or instrument-state exception."},{"archetype_element":"Task stage","domain_realization":"Preparation, reagent charging, milling, furnace loading, heat treatment, controlled cooling, sampling, workup, and review."},{"archetype_element":"Critical detail exception","domain_realization":"A hazard, contraindication, atmosphere breach, pressure condition, or irreversible handling constraint bypasses optional layers and appears before the affected action."},{"archetype_element":"Orientation cue","domain_realization":"A persistent batch identifier, material state, stage label, completed-step trail, and visible indication of available deeper detail."},{"archetype_element":"Drilldown and return paths","domain_realization":"Links connect each instruction to its rationale, approved exception response, source procedure section, and then back to the active step."},{"archetype_element":"Full Access escape hatch","domain_realization":"The researcher can open the complete approved procedure at any stage without advancing or altering the batch state."}],"mechanism_mapping":[{"mechanism_slug":"wizard_or_stepper_workflow","role":"Stages ordinary synthesis guidance according to the physical progression of the batch while permitting safe backtracking and full-procedure access.","counterfactual_removal":"Without stage-based progression, setup, reaction, sampling, and workup details return to a flat presentation and compete for attention."},{"mechanism_slug":"just_in_time_help","role":"Reveals rationale, worked examples, instrument notes, and definitions when the researcher requests them from the active step.","counterfactual_removal":"Without contextual help, researchers must leave the active step and search separate documentation for interpretation details."},{"mechanism_slug":"contextual_warning","role":"Surfaces mandatory responses when a recorded atmosphere, temperature, pressure, or timing condition matches an approved exception rule.","counterfactual_removal":"Without the risk-triggered override, critical deviation instructions remain dependent on voluntary drilldown and may be treated like optional depth."},{"mechanism_slug":"summary_detail_view","role":"Connects the concise active-step view to parameters, assumptions, analytical criteria, and the full controlled procedure.","counterfactual_removal":"Without the summary-detail relationship, the concise layer becomes an unsupported instruction rather than an inspectable representation of the approved method."}],"causal_chain":["A flat synthesis procedure exposes setup, execution, analysis, and rare-exception detail simultaneously.","The researcher must continually filter that information to identify what matters for the batch’s current material state and task stage.","The layered batch record makes the smallest safe current-stage instruction the default view while explicitly signaling available depth.","Stage transitions reveal the next applicable instruction, and user requests reveal supporting explanation without removing the current context.","Procedure-defined risk signals bypass ordinary staging and display mandatory warnings and deviation routes before the affected action.","Breadcrumbs, depth labels, source links, and full access let researchers and reviewers recover context and inspect the complete approved basis.","Realistic task testing can then determine whether the presentation changes retrieval, sequencing, warning recognition, and record completeness without changing the underlying chemistry or approval rules."],"baseline":"A static electronic or printed batch procedure that presents the complete method, safety notes, parameter tables, recording fields, and deviation appendices in a single document, with navigation supplied mainly by headings, page search, and the researcher’s memory of where details are located.","nearest_rivals":["A conventional phase-based checklist that shortens the method but does not preserve linked rationale, evidence, exceptions, and full procedural depth.","A searchable static SOP that improves retrieval but does not use task stage or risk state to determine when information appears.","An electronic laboratory notebook template with mandatory fields that captures observations but does not provide layered, state-dependent guidance.","Standalone alarms from glovebox or furnace controllers that signal abnormal state but do not disclose the procedure-specific consequence, approved response, and source context."],"remaining_contrastive_claim":"The candidate’s distinguishing claim is not that the procedure is digitized, shortened, searchable, or divided into sections; it is that approved information depth is governed by legible task-stage and risk triggers, while critical warnings bypass staging and every summary retains an explicit path to the complete controlled procedure.","authority_safety":{"decision_authority":"The principal investigator or designated process owner retains authority over synthesis parameters and deviation rules; environmental health and safety personnel retain authority over mandatory hazard content; the researcher retains stop-work authority.","authorized_first_step":"Create a non-operational, shadow-mode prototype from one already approved procedure and use it only in simulated batch walkthroughs.","excluded_actions":["Automatically change reagent quantities, atmosphere limits, furnace schedules, milling settings, or acceptance criteria.","Authorize an unapproved deviation or recommend improvisation beyond the controlled procedure.","Suppress safety data, mandatory personal protective equipment, stop-work criteria, or warnings that alter the safe action.","Control laboratory equipment or advance the recorded task stage without explicit researcher confirmation.","Replace required training, supervisory review, or emergency procedures."],"halt_rollback":"Stop the evaluation if any participant cannot find a mandatory warning or full-procedure view, interprets hidden detail as nonexistent, or is directed toward an action inconsistent with the approved procedure. Revert to the controlled static procedure; the shadow prototype neither changes equipment nor becomes the official batch record."},"negative_tests":{"strongest_counterevidence":"Researchers using the flat controlled procedure may already identify current actions, retrieve exception instructions, notice mandatory warnings, and produce reconstructable records without observable overload or search failure.","problem_falsifier":"In representative walkthroughs, users consistently locate stage-relevant and exception information promptly and correctly in the baseline, and observed difficulties are attributable to missing or contradictory procedural content rather than its timing and depth of presentation.","intervention_falsifier":"The layered prototype fails if it does not improve stage and exception retrieval relative to the baseline under the tested scenarios, or if any apparent navigation benefit is accompanied by missed warnings, incorrect assumptions about hidden content, loss of source traceability, or inability to reach the full procedure.","risks":["A stale or incorrectly encoded trigger could withhold relevant instructions or surface the wrong exception.","Researchers could over-trust the concise layer and stop exercising chemical judgment.","Stage confirmation could create additional interaction burden during glovebox or protective-equipment work.","The layered representation and controlled source procedure could diverge after a revision.","Adaptive disclosure could misclassify an unusual batch state as routine.","Frequent contextual warnings could produce warning fatigue.","Completion markers could be mistaken for evidence that the physical action was performed correctly."]},"next_evidence_step":"Conduct six bounded, non-chemical tabletop walkthroughs using the same approved procedure: three routine synthesis scenarios and three scenarios containing an atmosphere, furnace, timing, or pressure exception. Have representative researchers complete each scenario once with the static baseline and once with the shadow prototype in counterbalanced order. Record current-step selection, time and navigation actions required to find specified detail, mandatory-warning recognition before the simulated action, successful access to the full source procedure, sequencing errors, and participant explanations of what remained hidden. Do not connect the prototype to equipment or use it for a live batch.","prior_art_status":"UNSEARCHED","diversity_from_prior_proposals":"Not assessed against other proposals because runtime isolation prohibits inspecting them; this candidate is derived solely from the supplied progressive-disclosure archetype and chemistry-and-materials domain card.","revision_record":{"parent_version":null,"progress_targets_addressed":[],"conceptual_changes":[],"operational_changes":[],"evidence_changes":[],"claim_changes":[]}}