{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp09_archetype_breadth150_20260804","research_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp09_light_prior_art_20260804","cell_id":"synchronized_release_dampening__accounting_auditing","search_lanes":{"direct_problem_and_intervention":{"queries":["\"ledger final\" audit extract requests queue","\"period close\" \"audit evidence\" extraction ERP report requests","audit evidence extraction duplicate report requests ERP"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"],"no_result_note":"No retained source directly documented a ledger-final notification causing a short-window surge of audit extract jobs; direct phrase misses were treated as inconclusive."},"synonyms_and_historical_terms":{"queries":["PBC audit requests all due at once evidence bottleneck","prepared by client audit request management duplicate evidence","singleflight duplicate request coalescing documentation"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC3","SRC4"],"no_result_note":null},"products_practices_and_standards":{"queries":["audit evidence request management software PBC first party","Oracle E-Business Suite concurrent processing report request queue maximum processes","PCAOB AS 1105 company-produced audit evidence accuracy completeness"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC4"],"no_result_note":null},"component_combination":{"queries":["audit evidence request portal immutable hash reuse multiple requests","ERP report queue concurrency priority wait time audit evidence","exact-match concurrent request coalescing audit extract"],"source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"],"no_result_note":"The search found the components separately and in adjacent audit workflows, but no opened source described the complete ledger-trigger-aware combination."}},"sources":[{"source_id":"SRC1","title":"AuditRelay — Turn your auditor's PBC list into an evidence package","publisher":"AuditRelay","url":"https://www.getauditrelay.com/","source_type":"FIRST_PARTY_PRODUCT","claims_supported":["AuditRelay converts an auditor's PBC list into tracked tasks with owners and due dates.","Its page characterizes audit request lists as containing dozens of items due at once.","It stores collected evidence with SHA-256 hashes and permits approved evidence to be linked to multiple requests, providing close prior art for provenance-preserving evidence reuse.","The page does not describe coalescing identical in-flight ERP extractions or admitting post-close jobs according to live service capacity."]},{"source_id":"SRC2","title":"Oracle E-Business Suite Setup Guide: Concurrent Processing","publisher":"Oracle","url":"https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26401_01/doc.122/e22953/T174296T575591.htm","source_type":"FIRST_PARTY_PRODUCT","claims_supported":["Oracle E-Business Suite places report requests into concurrent processing and limits active requests through each manager's target-process maximum.","Requests can be scheduled or held, prioritized, run oldest-first at equal priority, and inspected for pending status and wait time.","This is direct prior art for queued, capacity-bounded and priority-aware ERP report execution, but not for audit-specific release cohorts or duplicate-result sharing."]},{"source_id":"SRC3","title":"singleflight package - golang.org/x/sync/singleflight","publisher":"The Go Authors","url":"https://pkg.go.dev/golang.org/x/sync/singleflight","source_type":"FIRST_PARTY_PRODUCT","claims_supported":["The singleflight package suppresses duplicate function calls.","Only one execution remains in flight for a given key; duplicate callers wait and receive the same result.","This closely matches the proposal's exact-equivalent in-flight extraction mechanism at the generic software-primitive level."]},{"source_id":"SRC4","title":"AS 1105: Audit Evidence","publisher":"Public Company Accounting Oversight Board","url":"https://pcaobus.org/oversight/standards/auditing-standards/details/AS1105","source_type":"OFFICIAL_STANDARD","claims_supported":["Auditors must obtain sufficient appropriate evidence, whose appropriateness depends on relevance and reliability.","For company-produced information, the auditor should test accuracy and completeness or the relevant controls and evaluate whether the information is sufficiently precise and detailed.","Evidence reliability depends partly on its source and the controls over its production and maintenance, constraining shared-extract and provenance designs."]}],"problem_evidence":{"status":"PARTLY_SUPPORTED","finding":"The component conditions are visible: a first-party audit product describes many PBC items due at once and evidence reuse across requests, while Oracle documents finite concurrent-report capacity, queues, priorities and waits. However, no opened source empirically demonstrated that a ledger-final signal produces the proposed narrow arrival cluster, aligned retries and support escalations. The domain-specific synchronized-release mechanism therefore remains a measurable hypothesis.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2"]},"closest_prior_art":[{"name":"Oracle E-Business Suite concurrent processing","source_ids":["SRC2"],"overlap":"Queues ERP report requests, caps concurrent execution through target processes, supports scheduling and holds, exposes wait and pending state, and applies request priority with oldest-first service among equal priorities.","remaining_difference":"It does not identify a ledger-final release cohort, suppress exact-equivalent in-flight executions, preserve separate audit-request provenance for a shared artifact, adapt admission to observed service health, or impose per-workstream fairness and maximum-wait bounds."},{"name":"AuditRelay reusable Evidence Vault","source_ids":["SRC1"],"overlap":"Centralizes PBC requests, hashes evidence and permits one approved artifact to be linked to multiple requests, overlapping request normalization, provenance and duplicate-evidence avoidance.","remaining_difference":"It reuses collected evidence rather than coalescing an identical live extraction, and its page does not describe capacity tokens, ledger-triggered cohorts, service-health feedback or a non-deferrable escape lane."},{"name":"Go singleflight duplicate-call suppression","source_ids":["SRC3"],"overlap":"Ensures one in-flight execution per key and gives concurrent duplicate callers the shared result, directly matching the proposal's coalescing primitive.","remaining_difference":"It supplies no audit-specific fingerprint fields, authorization separation, evidence validation, requester-level audit trail, capacity admission, fairness or priority policy."}],"prior_art_disposition":"ADJACENT_PRIOR_ART","contrastive_claim_remaining":"For audit extracts released by a common ledger-final event, adding audit-authorized exact-match single-flight sharing, health-based capacity admission, bounded cohorts, per-request provenance, maximum-wait fairness and a logged non-deferrable bypass to ordinary ERP concurrent processing will reduce trigger-window capacity violations and duplicate executions without impairing evidence reliability, authorization boundaries or required procedure timing.","contrastive_claim_falsifier":"The claim is falsified if replay data show no ledger-trigger-linked arrival concentration or material exact duplicates; ordinary ERP queue limits perform equivalently; the combined policy fails to reduce capacity violations, retries or maximum waits; or any shared extraction creates a snapshot, parameter, accuracy, completeness, provenance, authorization or procedure-timing error.","gates":{"adequate_source_search":{"status":"PASS","rationale":"The bounded search covered the direct formulation, PBC and evidence-request terminology, ERP concurrent-processing practice, auditing standards, evidence reuse and generic in-flight duplicate suppression. Exactly four opened sources from four publishers were retained, including an official auditing standard and three first-party sources.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"supported_problem":{"status":"PASS","rationale":"The problem is partly supported: simultaneous PBC obligations, reusable evidence, finite ERP report workers, queues and waits are visible. The specific ledger-final synchronization effect is explicitly bounded as an unconfirmed hypothesis suitable for the proposed metadata test.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2"]},"distinct_testable_claim":{"status":"PASS","rationale":"Despite adjacent prior art for every major component, the ledger-trigger-aware audit combination has a falsifiable contrast against ordinary ERP concurrent processing and evidence-reuse workflows using arrival concentration, duplicate executions, capacity violations, waits, provenance and authorization outcomes.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3","SRC4"]},"bounded_next_test":{"status":"PASS","rationale":"A read-only reconstruction of one completed close can compare trigger and matched ordinary intervals, fingerprint exact-equivalent requests, and replay measured jobs through single-flight and capacity gates without changing production evidence, ledgers or audit procedures.","source_ids":["SRC1","SRC2","SRC3"]},"no_obvious_safety_or_authority_stop":{"status":"PASS","rationale":"The proposed first test is retrospective and read-only. A production pilot would require auditor control over procedure timing and evidence sufficiency, validation of company-produced information, preserved access and provenance boundaries, and immediate bypass or rollback for non-deferrable work or mismatched artifacts.","source_ids":["SRC4"]}},"screen_survival":true,"world_novelty_boundary":"This four-source public-web screen found adjacent audit evidence reuse, ERP concurrency management and exact-key in-flight call suppression, but no opened source describing their full ledger-final-triggered audit combination. The bounded result cannot establish world novelty, patentability, market size, expert acceptance or realized value."}