{"classifications":[{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__physics::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The controller acts through lifecycle classifications, dependency review, retention rules, and disposition approvals.","evidence_reason":"Testing needs the ensemble’s authoritative manifests, dependencies, configurations, and documented analyses."},{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__physics::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Leases, dependency gates, lifecycle states, and review rules govern payload authority and retention.","evidence_reason":"Resolver replay requires internal payload registries, tags, reconstruction manifests, and dependency records."},{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__psychology::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The mechanism governs prospective scoring authority, expert overrides, review, retirement, and reconstruction access.","evidence_reason":"Qualified evaluators must use the alternative selection workflow to assess authorized choices and reconstruction."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__astronomy_astrophysics::P5","substrate":"MEASUREMENT_INSTRUMENTATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Protected target-free apertures create simultaneous measurement conditions for background estimation and validation.","evidence_reason":"The archived comparison requires raw instrument data, configurations, throughput metadata, and target-assignment records."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__marine_science::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"Geofencing, prohibited-operation rules, access approval, and logged station allocation create and maintain the void.","evidence_reason":"The claim needs a live bounded survey visit and operational compliance evidence from people and vessels."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__marine_science::P5","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"Allocation classification, custody, release triggers, and retention authority protect the reserve from routine consumption.","evidence_reason":"The pilot tests preservation, custody, retrieval, and primary-assay sufficiency under controlled sample handling."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__rhetoric::P2","substrate":"PHYSICAL_MATERIAL","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The primary intervention is the materially structured briefing surface with a protected empty visual region.","evidence_reason":"The central test measures how participants interpret the format and generate options in deliberation."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__rhetoric::P5","substrate":"PHYSICAL_MATERIAL","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"Protected blank spatial separation between argumentative units supplies the claimed grouping signal.","evidence_reason":"Reader interpretation and screen-reader walkthroughs are needed to test the intended claim-evidence boundaries."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__environmental_climate::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"Frozen selection rules, resource equalization, scoring, advancement limits, and review govern the rivalry.","evidence_reason":"The authorized evidence is from contained replicated biological trial blocks and technical measurements."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__futurism_foresight::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"Warrants, registration, masking, audits, and portfolio rules allocate scarce verification capacity.","evidence_reason":"The next step is a preregistered historical or synthetic replay with fixed verification budgets."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__human_computer_interaction::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"Operating-system allocation logic implements identity aggregation, credit caps, bids, priorities, and explanations.","evidence_reason":"Consented users must assess alternative notification timelines, settings, explanations, and accessibility interactions."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__human_computer_interaction::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"Registration, safety gates, resource caps, scoring, command leases, and reopening rules govern responders’ rivalry.","evidence_reason":"Trained responders must apply the competing incident procedures in tabletop scenarios."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__human_computer_interaction::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"Sealed submissions, caps, reproducibility gates, portfolio awards, fouls, and appeals govern competitive discovery.","evidence_reason":"The mock round depends on consented testers and scorers applying the process to reports."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__mathematics::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The proposal replaces discretionary scheduling with eligibility checks, internal-credit bidding, bonds, and enforcement rules.","evidence_reason":"The authorized test is an offline scripted allocation simulation using deidentified job cards."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__nanotechnology::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"Eligibility, balanced comparison, scoring, audits, provisional designation, and challenge rules perform the causal work.","evidence_reason":"Assessing transferability requires interlaboratory technical records, protocol execution, and audits of materials or laboratories."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__religious_studies_theology::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is an editor-governed process for symmetric review, judging, grants, challenge, and expiration.","evidence_reason":"The coding exercise depends on an authorized archive’s completed exchanges and associated editorial-process records."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__sociology_anthropology::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The rulebook, burden budget, portfolio selection, inquiry, sanctions, and expiry govern access rivalry.","evidence_reason":"Community, methods, ethics, and appeal roles must apply the institutional rules in the tabletop."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__sociology_anthropology::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposal governs repository qualification, custody allocation, audits, appeals, transition, and future challenge.","evidence_reason":"Preservation, community-protocol, security, cost, and appeal roles must apply rules to staged custody cases."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__accounting_auditing::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"A governed intermediary workflow structures authenticated evidence exchange, routing, and controller separation.","evidence_reason":"The pilot requires counterpart contact and reconciliation of live eligible buyer-supplier cases."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__criminology_forensic::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The consult lane assigns intake, escalation, authority boundaries, documentation, and specialist readiness.","evidence_reason":"Professionals must make preservation and escalation choices across matched scene simulations."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__film_media_production::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"A versioned macro and validation gateway assemble, check, and route turnover-package information.","evidence_reason":"Matched shadow testing needs internal production turnovers, source readiness, workflow artifacts, and staff records."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__futurism_foresight::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The versioned kernel validates and transforms dossiers through structured workflow logic.","evidence_reason":"The probe requires the utility’s internal dossiers, analyst work, reviewer activity, and downstream records."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__human_computer_interaction::P4","substrate":"HYBRID_OTHER","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The reusable software shell and the governed human operator lane are co-primary in delivering the simulated behavior.","evidence_reason":"The central probe requires participant-facing sessions assessing interaction, fidelity, consent, and operator-mediated delivery."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__religious_studies_theology::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"Versioned conversion modules and the uncertainty-propagation engine perform the recurring transformation.","evidence_reason":"The next step is a controlled technical comparison of module and manual conversion outputs across fixed cases."}]}