{"classifications":[{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__criminology_forensic::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention changes contest rules, scoring, safeguards, and resource allocation among teams.","evidence_reason":"Its decisive test randomly assigns volunteer teams to governed versus non-ranked review conditions."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__criminology_forensic::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The causal mechanism is a governed recurring stewardship enactment with assigned follow-through roles.","evidence_reason":"The authorized pilot requires volunteer custodians to participate and report understanding and safety."},{"input_id":"E3::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__ethnography_qualitative_methods","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Lifecycle states, retention authority, dependency review, and disposition paths are governance procedures for repository artifacts.","evidence_reason":"The read-only inventory, shadow classification, and restore drill require access to a completed study's internal repository records."},{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__cognitive_science::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"Inference leases alter which evidence layers an adaptive estimator computationally uses.","evidence_reason":"The decisive step is an offline replay comparing estimator implementations and reconstruction behavior."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__rhetoric::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The landing window is a publication workflow that queues routine institutional messages under defined exemptions.","evidence_reason":"The proposed check depends on consenting participants and operators using matched mock feeds."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__accounting_auditing::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is an abstract software contract and conformance oracle for evidence-repository behavior.","evidence_reason":"It is tested through synthetic fixtures, independent adapters, and black-box generated-sequence tests."},{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__physics::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"A lifecycle registry and resolver govern computational default selection of calibration payloads.","evidence_reason":"The next step is a shadow resolver replay and technical reconstruction test against manifests."},{"input_id":"E4::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__law_governance::PROPOSAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The register assigns authority, review, preservation, search-demotion, and disposition procedures to guidance artifacts.","evidence_reason":"Evaluation requires agency guidance files, authorized reviewers, dependency information, and archive samples."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__criminology_forensic::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The fast track is a governed verification workflow that routes nominations through authoritative checks and custodian review.","evidence_reason":"Its shadow comparison depends on closed disposition records and internal source-status and workload information."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__futurism_foresight::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention coordinates specialist roles, eligibility screening, parallel review, and nonbinding readiness dossiers.","evidence_reason":"Testing the repeated cell cycles requires live cross-functional reviewers performing an organizational workflow."},{"input_id":"E4::invariant_mode_decomposition_design__economics_finance::RETRIEVAL_FIRST","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposed causal mechanism is graph construction and spectral-sensitivity ranking for outreach decisions.","evidence_reason":"The retrospective validation requires confidential restructuring consent records and authorized legal interpretation."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__human_computer_interaction::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"It defines an abstract concern-anchor interface and resolver behavior independent of design representations.","evidence_reason":"The next test is an offline synthetic mutation suite over prototype revisions and resolver implementations."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__sociology_anthropology::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Prevalidated transformation recipes and packaging automation perform the repeatable conversion work of the workbench.","evidence_reason":"The shadow assay requires authorized ethnographic deposits and repository and governance review artifacts."},{"input_id":"E5::deadweight_loss_reduction__sociology_anthropology::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention changes allocation, readiness, reserve, and standby rules for scarce archive hours.","evidence_reason":"The tabletop clearing test depends on internal capacity, permissions, scheduling, and request records."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__accounting_auditing::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention specifies a representation-independent reconciliation state machine and conformance oracle.","evidence_reason":"It is evaluated through an in-memory model, a read-only adapter, and generated black-box workflow tests."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__criminology_forensic::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The observance works through voluntary collective commitments, symbolic recognition, and assigned stewardship review.","evidence_reason":"The authorized pilot measures experiences and simulated handoffs among volunteer staff."},{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__environmental_climate::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The lifecycle register governs review, preservation vetoes, dependency checks, and authorized specimen disposition.","evidence_reason":"The proposed evidence step uses internal accession, freezer, project, and ownership records without handling specimens."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__linguistics_semiotics::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a transcript-rendering interface that computationally represents verified intervals as a silence lane.","evidence_reason":"The decisive check asks eligible analysts to interpret alternative views of the excerpts."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__religious_studies_theology::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"A learner-state model and residual comparator determine the first-pass information representation for review.","evidence_reason":"The next step is a controlled held-out evaluation of frozen predictions, residuals, and reconstruction fidelity."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__sociology_anthropology::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The causal work is done by a versioned expected-encounter model and structured residual triage pipeline.","evidence_reason":"The retrospective shadow pilot requires authorized private encounter notes and internal review work."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__criminology_forensic::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"A predictive custody-state model and comparator generate the structured residual-assurance queue.","evidence_reason":"The authorized study is a controlled offline crossover using synthetic or closed-record ledger sequences."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__nanotechnology::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention principally changes tender rules, scoring, bonded obligations, interfaces, and procurement rivalry.","evidence_reason":"The non-awarding shadow tender relies on archived bids, procurement records, and already-authorized assay evidence."},{"input_id":"E3::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__statistics_experimental_design","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Artifact lifecycle labels, retention gates, dependency checks, and restoration are repository-governance procedures.","evidence_reason":"The read-only test requires a study's internal artifacts, approval records, and dependency information."},{"input_id":"E5::deadweight_loss_reduction__robotics_automation::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention redesigns internal chargeback and funding rules for robot-deployment decisions.","evidence_reason":"The shadow evaluation requires internal finance, time, expense, proposal, and approval records."}]}