{"classifications":[{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__religious_studies_theology::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention works through a governed observance, participant roles, status decisions, and assigned institutional follow-through.","evidence_reason":"Its decisive evidence requires a live consortium observance and participant experience alongside subsequent artifact actions."},{"input_id":"E5::computability_boundary_mapping__film_media_production::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The causal mechanism is a scope-enforced computational feasibility service with enumeration, dovetailing, and certificates.","evidence_reason":"The next step is a closed synthetic prototype and formal review of its computational behavior."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__religious_studies_theology::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention changes curriculum-selection rules, incentives, review roles, and appeals.","evidence_reason":"The authorized inquiry depends on internal records from completed departmental selection cycles."},{"input_id":"E4::deadweight_loss_reduction__systems_cybernetics::PROPOSAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is an allocation-rule change governing reservations, releases, eligibility, and protected access.","evidence_reason":"The immediate decision relies on historical reservation and readiness records from the laboratory."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__astronomy_astrophysics::P5","substrate":"MEASUREMENT_INSTRUMENTATION","evidence_dependency":"PUBLIC_DOCUMENTARY","substrate_reason":"Protected target-free apertures are designed simultaneous measurement conditions for estimating background structure.","evidence_reason":"The next step analyzes archived configurations, raw observations, and associated technical metadata."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__human_computer_interaction::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The proposal governs rivalry through registration, scoring, resource caps, command leases, and reopening rules.","evidence_reason":"Its next evidence comes from controlled tabletop scenarios in an isolated simulator."},{"input_id":"E3::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__music_musicology","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposed work classifies, demotes, preserves, and quarantines editorial layers through lifecycle rules.","evidence_reason":"The authorized pilot requires access to one consenting project's internal assets and their status relationships."},{"input_id":"E4::negative_space_design__information_theory::PROPOSAL_FIRST","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"Typed quiet epochs are a communication-protocol and decoder-semantics intervention.","evidence_reason":"The decisive next step is a bounded synthetic channel experiment with defined traces and protocols."},{"input_id":"E4::computability_boundary_mapping__ethnography_qualitative_methods::RETRIEVAL_FIRST","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a software-enforced three-state decision contract over sampling evidence.","evidence_reason":"The proposed shadow evaluation uses fixed synthetic or archived trajectories and controlled reviewer application."},{"input_id":"E4::invariant_mode_decomposition_design__political_science::RETRIEVAL_FIRST","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention computes network modes and perturbation-based rankings from referral data.","evidence_reason":"It requires approved longitudinal administrative records within an oversight system."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__futurism_foresight::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The rehearsal bed principally standardizes roles, admission, exercise workflow, handoffs, and reset governance.","evidence_reason":"The evaluation requires live cross-functional participants undertaking comparable scenario rehearsals."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__accounting_auditing::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The capsule is a reusable encoded reasoning and calculation workflow that selectively processes matching cases.","evidence_reason":"The shadow assessment depends on secured completed amendments and independent internal reperformance."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__sociology_anthropology::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention establishes contest, qualification, audit, custody, appeal, and exit rules for repositories.","evidence_reason":"The authorized evidence is a controlled synthetic custody exercise with prototype environments."},{"input_id":"E3::computability_boundary_mapping__history_historiography","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The proposed change is a bounded decidable rule fragment with exhaustive checking and explicit UNKNOWN outputs.","evidence_reason":"The next step is implementation and proof review on synthetic non-public formal models."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__mathematics::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The causal work is an opaque abstract polynomial interface, implementation mappings, and conformance suite.","evidence_reason":"The evidence is generated by isolated implementations, theorem re-establishment, and finite differential checks."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__film_media_production::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The Motif Relay governs collective interpretation, dissent, authority, and production-action ownership.","evidence_reason":"It requires a live production-group observance and participant-facing follow-up."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__aviation_aeronautics::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention defines an opaque computational prediction contract and implementation-independent conformance checks.","evidence_reason":"The proposed evidence is offline replay and synthetic-scenario testing of alternative implementations."},{"input_id":"E5::deadweight_loss_reduction__sociology_anthropology::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention changes institutional compensation rules, expense treatment, review thresholds, and safeguards.","evidence_reason":"The next step centers on de-identified departmental engagement records and internal protection review."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__accounting_auditing::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The proving cell is a governed rehearsal pathway that routes remediation cases through defined intake, review, reset, and release stages.","evidence_reason":"Its decisive evidence requires controlled replay in a segregated proving environment."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__nanotechnology::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The assembly governs contribution recognition, correction rights, participation, and formal referrals.","evidence_reason":"The next step is a controlled tabletop exercise using synthetic cases and structured comparison."},{"input_id":"E5::invariant_mode_decomposition_design__art_aesthetics::P5","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"MIXED_OR_UNCLEAR","substrate_reason":"The central intervention is a reduced computational representation of performance dynamics and its modal behavior.","evidence_reason":"The proposed evidence jointly requires technical reconstruction analysis and an authorized human restaging assessment."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__chemistry_materials::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The assembly structures collective interpretation, protected dissent, commitments, and closeout responsibility after technical decisions.","evidence_reason":"The pilot requires live participant responses and organizational follow-through in the research center."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__chemistry_materials::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The compact changes priority, credit, disclosure, resource, access, and appeal rules among consortium teams.","evidence_reason":"The authorized retrospective exercise depends on dated internal project and consortium records."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__aviation_aeronautics::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is an opaque public-state interface with formal behavioral laws and conformance testing.","evidence_reason":"The next step uses non-operational scenario traces, executable models, and seeded mapper defects."}]}