{"classifications":[{"input_id":"E3::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__rhetoric","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a lifecycle-review and authorization workflow for rhetorical assets.","evidence_reason":"Its pilot relies on reviewers’ live judgments and drafting behavior in an organizational setting."},{"input_id":"E4::negative_space_design__neuroscience::PROPOSAL_FIRST","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The causal change is scheduling logic that inserts protected no-stimulus epochs.","evidence_reason":"The next test fits and simulates response behavior from an experimental neural recording session."},{"input_id":"E3::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__chemistry_materials","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention governs sample states, access tiers, review, and reversible disposition.","evidence_reason":"Condition-checking samples is necessary to assess whether lifecycle classifications are valid."},{"input_id":"E3::deadweight_loss_reduction__security_intelligence","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"Risk tiering, parallel review, release gates, and rollback are institutional workflow changes.","evidence_reason":"The decisive pilot changes a live release process involving authorized consumers and reviewers."},{"input_id":"E4::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__law_governance::RETRIEVAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PUBLIC_DOCUMENTARY","substrate_reason":"Clause-specific expiry, renewal evidence, and lapse are legal-governance procedures.","evidence_reason":"The authorized shadow comparison uses closed directives or supplied constructed structural scenarios."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__nanotechnology::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"Matched predictors, residual encoding, gates, and reconstruction form the primary intervention.","evidence_reason":"It requires held-out assay traces and technical performance testing under controlled faults and calibration conditions."},{"input_id":"E3::computability_boundary_mapping__gender_studies","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The causal mechanism is formal policy classification and bounded automated analysis.","evidence_reason":"The proposed test compares analyzers against exhaustive truth on synthetic finite-state policies."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__accounting_auditing::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a facilitated participation and issue-routing procedure at audit milestones.","evidence_reason":"Its tabletop test depends on auditors’ behavior, perceptions, and handling of seeded contradictions."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__aviation_aeronautics::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The marked watch is a recurring coordination and commitment process tied to existing tracking.","evidence_reason":"Its test requires role representatives to rehearse, reconstruct responsibilities, and report consent or pressure."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__religious_studies_theology::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"A predictive coding model and residual-prioritization interface perform the core causal work.","evidence_reason":"The comparison depends on reviewers using the interfaces and reconstructing authorized records."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__accounting_auditing::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposal centers on a recurring reenactment, reciprocal commitments, and governance closure.","evidence_reason":"The next step assesses participants’ retained understanding, challenge willingness, and experienced pressure."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__futurism_foresight::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"An abstract behavioral contract and conformance logic define the intervention.","evidence_reason":"Independent adapters are exercised against fixed queries and metamorphic tests in a bounded technical comparison."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__nanotechnology::P1","substrate":"PHYSICAL_MATERIAL","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The ligand-patterned nanoporous cartridge is the physical mechanism intended to alter nucleation.","evidence_reason":"The claim requires controlled bench measurements of seed formation, reuse, and product quality."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__chemistry_materials::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The material-ledger contract, operations, and black-box oracle are computational information structures.","evidence_reason":"Synthetic histories and fault-injected independent implementations provide the decisive technical test."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__futurism_foresight::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a stateful software-level contract for forecast operations and scoring.","evidence_reason":"It is tested through synthetic operation histories across independent technical implementations."},{"input_id":"E5::deadweight_loss_reduction__robotics_automation::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention creates an evidence-gated review and sunset workflow for safety restrictions.","evidence_reason":"The authorized step depends on private maps, hazard records, and historical fleet-task telemetry."},{"input_id":"E4::computability_boundary_mapping__engineering_design::RETRIEVAL_FIRST","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"Mechanically enforced evaluator contracts and typed routing govern the optimizer’s information processing.","evidence_reason":"The shadow test uses scripted and recorded evaluator-failure cases in a technical evaluation fixture."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__astronomy_astrophysics::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The protected silent interval and structured restart change the group review procedure.","evidence_reason":"The comparison measures live reviewer contributions, framing effects, and participant experience."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__sociology_anthropology::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"Versioned predictive models and hierarchical residual routing are the intervention’s central mechanism.","evidence_reason":"It requires a council-approved rehearsal with consenting apprentices and knowledge-keeper assessment."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__linguistics_semiotics::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention changes the fieldworker-consultant elicitation interaction and response workflow.","evidence_reason":"Its test requires consenting consultants in recorded elicitation sessions."},{"input_id":"E4::deadweight_loss_reduction__astronomy_astrophysics::RETRIEVAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Noncash credit allocation and protected-access rules alter the observatory’s allocation process.","evidence_reason":"The shadow replay requires internal accepted-proposal, capacity, queue, and execution records."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__environmental_climate::P4","substrate":"PHYSICAL_MATERIAL","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"Selective phosphate-binding media and its regeneration cycle perform the proposed separation.","evidence_reason":"Decisive evidence requires controlled multi-cycle mass-balance and media-performance measurements."},{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__physics::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"MIXED_OR_UNCLEAR","substrate_reason":"The controller primarily governs classification, dependency review, retention, and disposition decisions.","evidence_reason":"The next step jointly requires internal manifest and dependency records plus technical archive restoration and execution checks."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__religious_studies_theology::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a recurring consent, disagreement, commitment, and follow-through governance cycle.","evidence_reason":"Its pilot depends on participants’ voluntary enactment, experience reports, and subsequent research-team conduct."}]}