{"classifications":[{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__environmental_climate::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention principally creates a voluntary, witnessed responsibility-renewal and handoff workflow.","evidence_reason":"Its decisive pilot requires participant-facing co-design, tabletop enactment, and assessment of understanding and pressure."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__film_media_production::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The causal mechanism is a synchronized predictive encoding and residual-reconstruction pipeline.","evidence_reason":"The next step is an offline technical comparison of encoders, decoders, reconstructions, and transfer performance."},{"input_id":"E4::negative_space_design__tech_ethics_ai_governance::RETRIEVAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PUBLIC_DOCUMENTARY","substrate_reason":"The intervention reserves portfolio capacity through an allocation and release rule.","evidence_reason":"The authorized shadow analysis uses existing organization-year allocation records without changing deployments."},{"input_id":"E4::negative_space_design__disaster_management::PROPOSAL_FIRST","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention changes the display's interface state, visibility logic, and recoverable content presentation.","evidence_reason":"The decisive feasibility check is a practitioner-facing tabletop comparison of the two displays."},{"input_id":"E5::computability_boundary_mapping__veterinary_medicine::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention operates through formal pipeline encodings, proof and counterexample processing, and verdict routing.","evidence_reason":"Its next step requires controlled implementation, exhaustive execution, and independent technical proof checking."},{"input_id":"E5::computability_boundary_mapping__human_computer_interaction::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a computational classification and explanation-routing system for executable rules.","evidence_reason":"The authorized test is a fixed offline fixture suite with exact expected computational results."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__environmental_climate::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposal allocates contestable water through eligibility rules, auction procedures, safeguards, and appeals.","evidence_reason":"The shadow exercise requires stakeholder bidding and institutional assessment of the governed allocation process."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__human_computer_interaction::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The causal work is performed by a cross-tool service that processes bids and controls shared-floor tokens.","evidence_reason":"The next step tests the broker in bounded live collaboration sessions with participants."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__religious_studies_theology::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a rotating human gateway with intake, routing, authority boundaries, and recovery procedures.","evidence_reason":"Its decisive pilot processes real consented cases through participants and institutional reviewers."},{"input_id":"E4::computability_boundary_mapping__public_administration_policy::RETRIEVAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PUBLIC_DOCUMENTARY","substrate_reason":"The intervention adds a mandatory pre-award assurance and contractual review procedure.","evidence_reason":"The authorized step codes completed public solicitation and award records."},{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__environmental_climate::P5","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The central intervention is a lifecycle register and decision-gating process for sediment strata.","evidence_reason":"The next step depends on a bathymetric measurement survey and technical reconciliation of sediment evidence."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__rhetoric::P2","substrate":"PHYSICAL_MATERIAL","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The causal intervention is the materially structured briefing layout with a protected empty visual region.","evidence_reason":"Its next step is a participant-facing counterbalanced deliberation exercise."},{"input_id":"E4::deadweight_loss_reduction__communication_media_studies::RETRIEVAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposal changes newsroom routing, clearance deadlines, and escalation procedures.","evidence_reason":"The shadow study requires participating desks' internal review episodes and counsel issue records."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__religious_studies_theology::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention's reusable facilitator is a versioned proposition graph and bounded rule-based tracing service.","evidence_reason":"The authorized crossover relies on authors and specialist reviewers evaluating real draft-claim dossiers."},{"input_id":"E5::computability_boundary_mapping__veterinary_medicine::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a computational enumeration, dovetailing, witness-validation, and result-labeling protocol.","evidence_reason":"Its next step uses a sealed synthetic simulator suite and independent technical reduction checking."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__linguistics_semiotics::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The causal change is an interface stage that withholds and later restores annotations around a recorded judgment.","evidence_reason":"The next step requires reviewers to make and explain first-pass decisions under counterbalanced conditions."},{"input_id":"E5::deadweight_loss_reduction__material_culture_museum_studies::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention changes fee-setting, eligibility, charging, and stewardship-funding rules.","evidence_reason":"The authorized audit depends on internal request, cost, rights-review, waiver, and abandonment records."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__sociology_anthropology::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention governs rival teams through shared evidence access, rules, scoring, audits, and appeals.","evidence_reason":"The authorized exercise requires human reviewers and role holders to run and assess the simulated arena."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__aviation_aeronautics::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposal is a multi-organization coordination workflow that preserves authoritative roles while brokering status.","evidence_reason":"Its next test is a tabletop exercise with operational participants assessing shared-status coordination."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__film_media_production::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The dock principally coordinates departmental reset responsibilities through a shared manifest, checks, and exception path.","evidence_reason":"The authorized probe requires a live crew performing repeated reset cycles on a production setup."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__rhetoric::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a two-state reading interface that controls annotation visibility and preserves first-pass records.","evidence_reason":"The next step is a counterbalanced study of readers' observations and interpretation of the protocol."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__futurism_foresight::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The causal mechanism is a versioned response-prediction, residual-entry, reconstruction, and audit system.","evidence_reason":"The authorized crossover requires experts to submit and assess responses under the two elicitation modes."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__aviation_aeronautics::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention changes departure-priority allocation through readiness verification, credits, bidding rules, and safety overrides.","evidence_reason":"The retrospective replay needs participating airport records and dispatcher assessments of historical operational states."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__sociology_anthropology::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a governed collective reopening and revision process for analytic categories.","evidence_reason":"The decisive pilot requires a live research team to enact the assembly and report its experience."}]}