{"classifications":[{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__film_media_production::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention principally creates a consent-governed editorial ritual with roles, assignments, holds, and review procedures.","evidence_reason":"Its next step requires observing participants and production conduct during live editorial milestones."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__environmental_climate::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The assembly's causal mechanism is a governed recognition and obligation-setting process among participants.","evidence_reason":"The tabletop test depends on participant accounts, group outputs, and safeguarding observations."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__sociology_anthropology::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposal organizes consent, participation, archive stewardship, and handoff through an annual social process.","evidence_reason":"The authorized pilot requires a live invited group and follow-up on stewardship actions."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__film_media_production::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The trust relay works through governed relationships, eligibility rules, human translation, and voluntary property decisions.","evidence_reason":"Testing requires actual opt-in interactions among productions, property controllers, and facilitators."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__religious_studies_theology::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is an editor-governed competitive review process with rules, audits, and allocation of a verification grant.","evidence_reason":"The next step relies on nonpublic completed exchange materials from an authorized archive."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__mathematics::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"Its causal work is performed by a versioned predictive atlas, typed residual routing, reconstruction, and audit logic.","evidence_reason":"The evaluation is a bounded computational comparison using simulated routing and controlled partitions."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__aviation_aeronautics::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The arena changes selection rules, resource caps, safety gates, audits, and portfolio allocation among teams.","evidence_reason":"Its next test is an offline simulation-based shadow downselect on non-operational controller builds."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__film_media_production::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The gateway's main causal work is automated assembly and validation of versioned turnover packages.","evidence_reason":"The proposed matched shadow probe evaluates technical packages and validation behavior without vendor delivery."},{"input_id":"E3::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__communication_media_studies","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention consists of editorial classification, supersession, quarantine, restoration, and preservation procedures.","evidence_reason":"The pilot requires a live publishing workflow and blinded audience tasks."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__futurism_foresight::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The vigil primarily establishes a recurring safeguarded process for reciprocal recognition and stewardship renewal.","evidence_reason":"The pilot depends on contributor participation, safeguarding review, and organizational handoff observations."},{"input_id":"E4::deadweight_loss_reduction__linguistics_semiotics::PROPOSAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposed lever changes allocation and reassignment rules for consultation slots while retaining protective constraints.","evidence_reason":"The authorized analysis uses de-identified internal scheduling and waiting-list records."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__film_media_production::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention governs a scarce editorial assignment through common-input rules, labor caps, judging, and appeals.","evidence_reason":"Its dry run requires live work by editors, reviewers, assistants, and safeguarding personnel."},{"input_id":"E4::invariant_mode_decomposition_design__psychology::RETRIEVAL_FIRST","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposed recommendation is generated by a multivariate transition model and modal stability analysis.","evidence_reason":"The feasibility study uses participant exposure sessions and clinical behavioral observations."},{"input_id":"E3::computability_boundary_mapping__architecture_urban_planning","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention formalizes rule semantics and routes inputs through computationally defined decision modes.","evidence_reason":"The next step is a shadow technical evaluation using formal proofs, injected cases, and a fixed corpus."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__film_media_production::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The causal change is an abstract software interface contract with adapters, invariants, and conformance tests.","evidence_reason":"The authorized work tests adapters and representation relayouts on read-only copied timeline material."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__accounting_auditing::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention defines allocation semantics as an opaque computational contract with executable behavioral laws.","evidence_reason":"The next step is a bounded fixture and adapter comparison against an independent exact-arithmetic model."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__marine_science::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention changes meeting facilitation by protecting a silent interval and ordering group deliberation.","evidence_reason":"The evaluation depends on participant first-pass notes, discussion behavior, and accessibility reports."},{"input_id":"E5::computability_boundary_mapping__film_media_production::P5","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The proposal's operative mechanism is formal reasoning, fragment classification, proof checking, and result-routing logic.","evidence_reason":"The next step is a closed-book technical evaluation with synthetic formal theories and prototype evaluators."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__mathematics::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention allocates scarce computation windows through auction rules, eligibility checks, credits, and enforcement procedures.","evidence_reason":"The proposed test is an offline scripted allocation exercise using deidentified job cards."},{"input_id":"E3::computability_boundary_mapping__systems_cybernetics","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention formalizes assurance claims and computational routing with explicit UNKNOWN and scope states.","evidence_reason":"Its next step is a non-actuating sandbox analysis against exhaustive bounded reference cases."},{"input_id":"E5::invariant_mode_decomposition_design__art_aesthetics::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The proposed correction method is driven by an estimated transition matrix, modal decomposition, and sensitivity computation.","evidence_reason":"The single-session test uses controlled calibration perturbations, held-out evaluations, and technical measurements."},{"input_id":"E4::deadweight_loss_reduction__astronomy_astrophysics::PROPOSAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The causal lever is a conditional return-and-reallocation rule for scheduled telescope time.","evidence_reason":"The authorized shadow reassignment relies solely on internal historical schedules, states, and approved-program records."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__futurism_foresight::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention governs provider rivalry through shared infrastructure, tender rules, parallel lanes, and displacement criteria.","evidence_reason":"The initial evaluation is an offline comparison using historical cutoffs and synthetic decision cases."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__rhetoric::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The protocol changes moderator conduct and participant response procedures during live message testing.","evidence_reason":"The next step requires mock sessions with volunteers and coded participant responses."}]}