{"classifications":[{"input_id":"E4::negative_space_design__neuroscience::RETRIEVAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention chiefly changes therapist-guided timing and interaction rules between training blocks.","evidence_reason":"Its decisive test is a consented participant-facing feasibility study in a clinical retraining setting."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__accounting_auditing::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The gateway's causal mechanism is a versioned transformation, validation, and routing pipeline.","evidence_reason":"The shadow replay requires secured internal source-period exports and manual-pathway records."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__sociology_anthropology::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention works through eligibility, scoring, appointments, sanctions, and representation procedures.","evidence_reason":"The authorized test relies on people applying institutional rules to synthetic association cases."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__chemistry_materials::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The primary intervention is a model-relative residual encoding and review-routing system.","evidence_reason":"The comparison depends on controlled characterization packages, assays, and technical review outputs."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__film_media_production::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention allocates rights through auction, qualification, enforcement, and reversion rules.","evidence_reason":"The next step is a reviewer-run tabletop exercise applying the proposed licensing process."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__criminology_forensic::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The causal work is a voluntary cross-agency observance with commitments, handoffs, and closure duties.","evidence_reason":"The authorized synthetic pilot measures participant understanding and experience."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__human_computer_interaction::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"It governs rival teams' access, resources, evaluation, appeals, and temporary deployment rights.","evidence_reason":"The shadow comparison uses consented participants and blinded human evaluation of prototypes."},{"input_id":"E5::invariant_mode_decomposition_design__art_aesthetics::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposed checkpoint depends on estimating and acting on a deliberation-update model and its modes.","evidence_reason":"Its calibration evidence comes from a committee's live scoring and discussion behavior."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__mathematics::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is an abstract sampler contract with implementation conformance checks.","evidence_reason":"The decisive work is exhaustive finite enumeration and technical oracle testing."},{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__physics::P5","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The causal mechanism is a data-buffer lifecycle with event pins, eviction, and restore logic.","evidence_reason":"The next step replays diagnostic traces through simulated retention policies and technical checks."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__aviation_aeronautics::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The assembly acts through cross-disciplinary enactment, commitments, and escalation ownership.","evidence_reason":"The authorized rehearsal tests participant comprehension and legitimacy in an organizational setting."},{"input_id":"E3::negative_space_design__speech_language_pathology","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention changes partner turn-taking rules, signals, and bounded support behavior.","evidence_reason":"The test observes consenting clients and partners during therapy-like communication sessions."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__film_media_production::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention reconstructs review imagery computationally from prior renders and differential residuals.","evidence_reason":"It requires controlled rendering, reconstruction, and independent technical ground-truth comparisons."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__mathematics::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a formal abstraction boundary and contract for mathematical constructions.","evidence_reason":"The decisive step is technical formalization and proof of the lemma suite and coherence laws."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__chemistry_materials::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The causal work is numerical baseline-plus-residual prediction with governed reference queries.","evidence_reason":"The test requires controlled reference computations and technical evaluation on fixed configurations."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__human_computer_interaction::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention defines executable abstract states, operations, invariants, and a black-box oracle.","evidence_reason":"The authorized study is an offline implementation-mutation and conformance test."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__aviation_aeronautics::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention works through a recurring cross-employer recognition and governance-closure practice.","evidence_reason":"The proposed evidence is a multi-organization rehearsal with participant comprehension measures."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__human_computer_interaction::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The enactment principally changes shared delegation commitments, accountability, and closure procedures.","evidence_reason":"Its next step uses a volunteer workgroup reenacting scenarios and reviewing governance fit."},{"input_id":"E5::invariant_mode_decomposition_design__information_theory::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention uses a computed confusion operator and modal codebook redesign to alter information processing.","evidence_reason":"The decisive comparison uses controlled relay transmissions and held-out technical measurements."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__criminology_forensic::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a governed commitment-renewal and quality-action process among participants.","evidence_reason":"The authorized pilot assesses volunteer experience and follow-through in a social setting."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__accounting_auditing::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a versioned predictive residual layer that reorganizes reconciliation review information.","evidence_reason":"Its shadow test requires completed internal close records and conventional reconciliations."},{"input_id":"E5::computability_boundary_mapping__human_computer_interaction::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The core intervention is a formal computational boundary, checker, and evidence-labeling mechanism.","evidence_reason":"The authorized work consists of offline fixtures, reductions, and exact finite comparison tests."},{"input_id":"E5::computability_boundary_mapping__film_media_production::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The proposal changes preflight computation through formal routing, model checking, and guarantee labels.","evidence_reason":"The decisive test uses synthetic executable packages and a finite-state checker."},{"input_id":"E5::computability_boundary_mapping__economics_finance::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a finite-instance decision algorithm with witness and cutoff semantics.","evidence_reason":"The next step is an offline enumeration exercise on synthetic collateral snapshots."}]}