{"classifications":[{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__cognitive_science::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Lifecycle states, stewardship decisions, retention exceptions, and dependency-gated disposition are the causal intervention.","evidence_reason":"The comparison requires a laboratory’s internal artifact history, ownership verification, and repository restoration access."},{"input_id":"E3::deadweight_loss_reduction__physics","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"Release timing, priorities, eligibility, and reassignment rules govern the proposed capacity recovery.","evidence_reason":"The decisive pilot reallocates real vacated instrument slots within a live facility workflow."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__mathematics::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a rotating, governed specialist handoff and review process.","evidence_reason":"Testing depends on specialists and reviewers performing the packet-reconstruction and evaluation exercise."},{"input_id":"E3::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__data_science","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Retention classes, owner decisions, dependency checks, and lifecycle dispositions perform the causal work.","evidence_reason":"The shadow pilot requires an organization’s non-production artifacts, lineage, and archive-restore access."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__aviation_aeronautics::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"A reusable compatibility dataset, transformation template, and rules engine perform repeated reconciliation and packet assembly.","evidence_reason":"The shadow probe requires internal maintenance, configuration, engineering, and authoritative-disposition records."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__environmental_climate::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The assembly’s declarations, dissent handling, commitments, and editorial ownership process are primary.","evidence_reason":"The tabletop test depends on participant interpretation, participation experience, and group reconciliation behavior."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__chemistry_materials::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"An abstract software state contract and conformance oracle govern adapter behavior.","evidence_reason":"The next step is a controlled fake-driver, fault-injection, and seeded-sequence technical test."},{"input_id":"E4::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__logistics_supply_chain::PROPOSAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Override ownership, review, retention, dependency tracing, and reversible deactivation are the intervention.","evidence_reason":"The evidence needs copied internal plans, override records, and operational and audit references."},{"input_id":"E5::computability_boundary_mapping__economics_finance::P5","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a formal rule compiler and runtime reference monitor over normalized events.","evidence_reason":"The authorized exercise is exhaustive synthetic trace testing and proof-artifact verification."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__film_media_production::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The opaque synchronization component and its representation-independent behavioral oracle are computational interfaces.","evidence_reason":"The proposed evidence uses fixed media fixtures and controlled metamorphic implementation tests."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__nanotechnology::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"A versioned compiler applies validated process knowledge and calibration data to create recipe packages.","evidence_reason":"Decisive testing requires fabricating witness coupons and conducting metrology under controlled conditions."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__film_media_production::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"Consent-aware witnessing, correction routing, stewardship, and provisional-record retirement are the causal mechanisms.","evidence_reason":"The test centers on a live observance and participants’ understanding, pressure, and correction behavior."},{"input_id":"E5::deadweight_loss_reduction__disaster_management::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention changes reimbursement-band rules, inventory commitments, and administrative safeguards.","evidence_reason":"The next step relies on activation or exercise lodging records, refusal reasons, and program budget data."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__chemistry_materials::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"A governed evidence-routing service with reviewer authorities and eligibility rules performs the proposed work.","evidence_reason":"The shadow probe requires closed internal dossiers, confidential review records, and authoritative decisions."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__environmental_climate::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is an abstract stateful service contract and common behavioral conformance model.","evidence_reason":"The next test requires simulation or an isolated hydraulic rig across specified events and faults."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__human_computer_interaction::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"Versioned predictors, residual encoding, digest verification, and synchronization logic do the causal work.","evidence_reason":"The proposed evidence is a scripted sandbox network-fault comparison with technical reconstruction checks."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__human_computer_interaction::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"A reusable compiler translates user-approved functional intents into application-specific configuration diffs.","evidence_reason":"The sandbox assessment requires users to configure applications, confirm changes, and exercise rollback and control."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__aviation_aeronautics::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Award rules, outcome scoring, warranty reserves, and portfolio allocation structure supplier rivalry.","evidence_reason":"The retrospective study requires internal work orders, shop records, and subsequent service outcomes."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__marine_science::P2","substrate":"PHYSICAL_MATERIAL","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"A physically bounded, protected absence of contact operations creates the local reference condition.","evidence_reason":"The decisive step is an operational field visit using vessel navigation, sampling, and imagery records."},{"input_id":"E3::negative_space_design__futurism_foresight","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention changes workshop sequencing by instituting a protected reflection interval.","evidence_reason":"It requires live participant responses, recall, discussion participation, and discomfort reporting."},{"input_id":"E4::invariant_mode_decomposition_design__political_science::PROPOSAL_FIRST","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PUBLIC_DOCUMENTARY","substrate_reason":"The causal mechanism is a fitted transition model and modal decomposition dashboard over bargaining-gap data.","evidence_reason":"The authorized test is confined to a city’s archival bargaining record and hypothetical procedural sensitivity analysis."},{"input_id":"E4::deadweight_loss_reduction__communication_media_studies::PROPOSAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Risk-tier eligibility, reuse of clearances, parallel review, and escalation rules alter the approval workflow.","evidence_reason":"The audit requires participating outlets’ internal republication requests, review histories, and protected-interest records."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__criminology_forensic::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"A versioned reference library and extraction-comparison workflow generate reproducible forensic packets.","evidence_reason":"The authorized probe uses laboratory-created files and controlled examiner-pathway comparisons."},{"input_id":"E3::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__veterinary_medicine","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Clinical adjudication, retention gates, and lifecycle disposition of record layers are primary.","evidence_reason":"The silent retrospective test requires closed clinic encounter records and clinician adjudication."}]}