{"classifications":[{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__human_computer_interaction::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is an abstract software contract and adapter-conformance model for transforming interface traces.","evidence_reason":"Its decisive test is an offline synthetic adapter and metamorphic-conformance study."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__sociology_anthropology::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The causal mechanism is an opaque computational frame representation with defined operations and behavioral laws.","evidence_reason":"The next step tests independently implemented backends against synthetic records in a controlled conformance exercise."},{"input_id":"E4::deadweight_loss_reduction__communication_media_studies::RETRIEVAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"It changes editorial routing, eligibility, escalation, and review-deadline procedures.","evidence_reason":"The decisive study uses participating newsroom review episodes and subsequent organizational safety monitoring."},{"input_id":"E4::deadweight_loss_reduction__astronomy_astrophysics::PROPOSAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention reallocates awarded telescope time through governed release and priority rules.","evidence_reason":"The shadow reassignment requires contemporaneous observatory schedules, states, and approved-program records."},{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__psychology::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The ledger principally governs participant commitment review, demotion, dependency checks, and restoration decisions.","evidence_reason":"The decisive comparison requires participant-facing usability testing of the proposed commitment lifecycle."},{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__psychology::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"A registry and scoring gate computationally control package identity, context matching, and selectable scoring authority.","evidence_reason":"Qualified evaluators must use the mock-up to test authorized selection and reconstruction behavior."},{"input_id":"E5::deadweight_loss_reduction__robotics_automation::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"It replaces departmental reservation entitlements with expiry and auditable waitlist allocation rules.","evidence_reason":"The initial decision depends on internal validation-cell schedules, readiness records, and reviewer constraints."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__aviation_aeronautics::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a stateful abstract ledger and sequence-based software conformance boundary.","evidence_reason":"It is decided through a test-environment reference model, seeded implementations, and sequence testing."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__rhetoric::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention establishes a bounded publication and exception-handling procedure for institutional channels.","evidence_reason":"Its next test requires participant interpretation and operator execution of the mock publication process."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__aviation_aeronautics::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The broker changes cross-organization coordination roles, contracts, escalation, and status-confirmation workflow.","evidence_reason":"The decisive tabletop probe requires participants to enact institutional coordination across simulated cases."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__accounting_auditing::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The proving cell chiefly governs a repeatable remediation rehearsal and retest-readiness workflow.","evidence_reason":"The next step is a contained replay of historical cases through a controlled test fixture."},{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__physics::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"It governs specimen allocation, custody, review, reserve, assay, and disposition decisions.","evidence_reason":"The shadow assessment requires restricted specimen, custody, mass, analysis, and location records."},{"input_id":"E3::deadweight_loss_reduction__physics","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention changes release and reassignment rules for shared instrument allocations.","evidence_reason":"The authorized next step is a prospective operating-facility pilot with live scheduling and users."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__sociology_anthropology::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The causal mechanism is a versioned prediction-and-residual information-processing procedure.","evidence_reason":"It requires live participant-observation meetings, analyst interpretation, and advisory review."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__nanotechnology::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"It processes command copies and sensor waveforms through a forward model, comparator, and supervisory logic.","evidence_reason":"The decisive work uses held-out waveforms and hardware-in-the-loop technical testing."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__sociology_anthropology::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The workbench structures authorized intake, exception routing, transformation oversight, and repository handoff.","evidence_reason":"Its shadow assay depends on controlled copies of authorized deposits and their restricted governance records."},{"input_id":"E4::deadweight_loss_reduction__communication_media_studies::PROPOSAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"It alters approval routing, reuse of prior clearances, parallel checks, and escalation rules.","evidence_reason":"The next step relies on participating outlets' internal republication requests and review histories."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__sociology_anthropology::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The liaison service changes preparation, translation, routing, and recovery procedures while retaining decision authority.","evidence_reason":"The proposed shadow probe requires de-identified historical entry-case records and associated process artifacts."},{"input_id":"E3::deadweight_loss_reduction__chemistry_materials","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposal changes quota transfer and waitlist allocation rules for shared instruments.","evidence_reason":"It culminates in a live pilot reallocating otherwise forfeitable slots among facility users."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__religious_studies_theology::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The reusable conversion modules and uncertainty engine perform the central transformation work.","evidence_reason":"The next step is a controlled technical comparison of module outputs against manual conversion and review."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__mathematics::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention establishes contest rules, allocation conditions, independent audits, and challenger governance.","evidence_reason":"Its decisive shadow trial requires teams, auditors, and maintenance handoff participants to operate the process."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__nanotechnology::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"It introduces a recurring social procedure for contribution recognition, review rights, commitments, and dispute referral.","evidence_reason":"The next step is a participant-facing tabletop enactment evaluating understanding, pressure, and attribution signals."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__rhetoric::P5","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is an information-layout grammar that encodes claim-evidence boundaries through structured visual and programmatic grouping.","evidence_reason":"Its decisive test requires reader interpretation and accessibility walkthroughs of the alternative layouts."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__environmental_climate::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention specifies an abstract behavioral interface and conformance oracle for alternative buffer-unit designs.","evidence_reason":"The next test requires simulation or isolated-rig sequence testing of candidate physical designs."}]}