{"classifications":[{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__mathematics::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention principally creates a voluntary instructional ritual with participation rules, commitments, and follow-through obligations.","evidence_reason":"Its decisive pilot evidence comes from live student participation, debriefs, and a follow-up proof task."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__film_media_production::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The relay works through governed relationships, eligibility, consent routes, and coordination among organizations.","evidence_reason":"Testing requires a live opt-in probe involving productions, property controllers, and independent participant checks."},{"input_id":"E5::deadweight_loss_reduction__material_culture_museum_studies::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The primary intervention is an admission-allocation rule with protected allotments and access-credit safeguards.","evidence_reason":"The authorized test relies on the museum's slot-level operating records and a paper simulation rather than a live price change."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__film_media_production::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The stand-down is a governed cross-rank practice that renews standing and assigns safety follow-through.","evidence_reason":"The decisive probe requires live crew participation, a tabletop check, and participant debriefing."},{"input_id":"E5::invariant_mode_decomposition_design__literature_literary_theory::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"MIXED_OR_UNCLEAR","substrate_reason":"The causal intervention is a fitted modal decomposition and sensitivity analysis of revision-state data.","evidence_reason":"Its central test jointly depends on private manuscript snapshots and blinded human reader outcomes."},{"input_id":"E5::deadweight_loss_reduction__disaster_management::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The protocol changes assignment persistence, confirmation, and authorized release rules for scarce generators.","evidence_reason":"The authorized shadow analysis depends on closed internal mission, facility, transport, and asset records."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__futurism_foresight::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The assembly governs revisable contributor permissions, institutional accountability, and obligation closure.","evidence_reason":"The pilot requires contributor participation, consent review, and verification of organizational follow-through."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__criminology_forensic::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The consult lane is principally a governed human-specialist workflow with routing and authority limits.","evidence_reason":"The authorized decisive test is a controlled randomized simulation using matched scene packets and expert scoring."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__futurism_foresight::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention defines a stateful software-level behavioral contract and conformance logic.","evidence_reason":"It is tested through synthetic histories run across independent implementations and scoring adapters."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__film_media_production::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The gateway's causal work is automated assembly and validation of turnover packages under an interface contract.","evidence_reason":"The proposed probe compares live shadow turnover work across production cases and staff roles."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__criminology_forensic::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The observance governs cross-agency recognition, role handoffs, commitments, and repair ownership.","evidence_reason":"Its evidence requires volunteer participants in a synthetic interagency exercise and an observer."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__futurism_foresight::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The proposal reorganizes procurement, contest rules, provider access, and displacement governance.","evidence_reason":"The next step is an offline portability and comparison exercise using historical cutoffs and synthetic cases."},{"input_id":"E4::computability_boundary_mapping__engineering_design::PROPOSAL_FIRST","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The assurance gate classifies formal models and verification guarantees through computational representations and routing logic.","evidence_reason":"It is evaluated against frozen controller models by independent technical reviewers without operational deployment."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__nanotechnology::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is an abstract measurement-channel contract with simulated backend conformance tests.","evidence_reason":"The authorized step uses synthetic scenarios and independent simulated implementations rather than physical connectivity."},{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__environmental_climate::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The lifecycle register governs authority, review, expiration, dependency checks, and retirement of rule patches.","evidence_reason":"Testing requires internal directives, runbooks, configurations, and a non-production reconciliation exercise."},{"input_id":"E5::computability_boundary_mapping__veterinary_medicine::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is an algorithmic witness-search protocol with explicit computational guarantees and labels.","evidence_reason":"The authorized evidence is a sealed synthetic simulator suite and a checked technical reduction."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__futurism_foresight::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The warrant arena works through allocation limits, selection rules, audits, and protected reporting channels.","evidence_reason":"Its paper replay depends on a bounded internal or synthetic signal stream and verification-work records."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__film_media_production::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The reset dock principally coordinates departmental responsibilities, shared state definitions, and release confirmations.","evidence_reason":"The decisive probe observes live crew reset cycles on a production setup."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__film_media_production::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The observance creates a governed collective process for recalling, contesting, and assigning editorial obligations.","evidence_reason":"Testing requires participants at actual editorial milestones, debriefs, and follow-up disposition checks."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__futurism_foresight::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The standing relay is a governed human-convener service managing relationships, panels, conflicts, and recovery.","evidence_reason":"Its test compares live consultation pathways with recruited participants across bounded cycles."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__human_computer_interaction::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The causal mechanism is a cross-tool software broker that manages bids, tokens, queue state, and releases.","evidence_reason":"The authorized probe requires repeated live collaborative sessions with participating users and moderators."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__linguistics_semiotics::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is an information-representation design that encodes typed observations in a slot-based atlas.","evidence_reason":"Its decisive exercise depends on analysts interpreting the alternative views in a counterbalanced study."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__human_computer_interaction::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The foundry's causal core is a reusable interactive software shell with controlled behavior modules and operator logic.","evidence_reason":"The proposed test requires participant-facing sessions that assess experienced interaction behavior and safeguards."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__human_computer_interaction::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The boundary walk governs household standing, consent, disagreement, and translation of commitments into assigned actions.","evidence_reason":"The next step requires volunteer households to enact the process in an instrumented test environment."}]}