{"classifications":[{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__criminology_forensic::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"A frozen state-transition predictor and residual-comparison pipeline perform the intervention's causal work.","evidence_reason":"The authorized offline crossover uses synthetic or approved closed-record sequences under controlled review conditions."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__aviation_aeronautics::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is an opaque software contract with implementation-independent conformance logic.","evidence_reason":"The authorized step uses offline replay, synthetic scenarios, and deliberately broken implementations."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__chemistry_materials::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Rules for claims, visibility, reserves, audits, disputes, and competition govern the causal intervention.","evidence_reason":"The shadow assessment requires seller-level transaction, shipment, rating, and search-exposure records."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__criminology_forensic::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"A frozen forward model and multi-source residual-routing system perform the primary causal work.","evidence_reason":"The prescribed retrospective evaluation depends on completed-program aggregate records or an equivalent private replay."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__futurism_foresight::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"A capped cross-functional review lane, its roles, and its workflow are the intervention.","evidence_reason":"Deciding the claim requires observing live specialist coordination, handoffs, and readiness cycles."},{"input_id":"E3::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__statistics_experimental_design","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Artifact lifecycle states, retention gates, and disposition procedures drive the proposed change.","evidence_reason":"The read-only inventory and retrieval tasks require access to a study's internal artifacts and dependencies."},{"input_id":"E3::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__tech_ethics_ai_governance","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Lifecycle ownership, review, retention, and authority controls are the primary intervention.","evidence_reason":"The pilot relies on an AI service's internal approvals, exceptions, and review outcomes."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__mathematics::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention structures a selection arena through eligibility, validation, portfolio rules, and sanctions.","evidence_reason":"The authorized exercise needs human validators, volunteer solvers, and graders to perform the governed process."},{"input_id":"E5::computability_boundary_mapping__human_computer_interaction::P5","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"Workflow-language semantics, termination checking, statuses, checkpoints, and effect logging are computational mechanisms.","evidence_reason":"The next step is a controlled offline fixture suite with mocked execution and external states."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__marine_science::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The causal change is interface-rendering logic that separates observed data from gaps and estimates.","evidence_reason":"The decision relies on blinded users interpreting alternative views and accessibility representations."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__chemistry_materials::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"A governed assembly, commitments, recognition, and closure assignments enact the intervention.","evidence_reason":"The pilot requires participant responses and observation of social meaning and closeout practice."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__chemistry_materials::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"A command-conditioned forward model, residual encoder, and reconstruction path perform the causal work.","evidence_reason":"The authorized evaluation requires controlled machine passes, sensors, and engineer-approved challenge conditions."},{"input_id":"E4::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__aviation_aeronautics::PROPOSAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Configuration lifecycle metadata, applicability review, retention, and quarantine rules are the intervention.","evidence_reason":"The evaluation uses internal configuration packages, manifests, reports, and restoration workflows."},{"input_id":"E4::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__law_governance::RETRIEVAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PUBLIC_DOCUMENTARY","substrate_reason":"Clause-specific expiry leases and affirmative renewal requirements are legal-governance procedures.","evidence_reason":"The stated shadow comparison can be conducted from closed directives or constructed directive records without operational access."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__accounting_auditing::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The witness cycle changes meeting roles, participation, commitments, and issue handoff procedures.","evidence_reason":"The authorized tabletop depends on volunteer auditors' participation, perceptions, and group interactions."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__religious_studies_theology::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"A versioned commitment model and semantic residual-processing workspace perform the primary intervention.","evidence_reason":"The authorized review requires institutional draft archives, comments, dispositions, and authorized reviewers."},{"input_id":"E3::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__music_musicology","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Layer status classification, preservation holds, quarantine, and restoration governance drive the change.","evidence_reason":"The pilot depends on access to a consenting project's internal editorial layers and provenance."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__environmental_climate::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a voluntary assembly that enacts retirement, obligation transfer, and shared interpretation.","evidence_reason":"Its decisive evidence comes from participant understanding, consent conditions, and observed closure handoffs."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__accounting_auditing::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Queue-priority rules, verification, appeals, anti-abuse controls, and capacity allocation govern the intervention.","evidence_reason":"The authorized shadow replay depends on internal close, reconciliation, exception, and escalation records."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__religious_studies_theology::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention defines an abstract attestation interface, state transitions, and conformance behavior.","evidence_reason":"The authorized step uses synthetic dossiers and generated interface sequences in a bounded seminar exercise."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__accounting_auditing::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposal governs competing allocation models through entry rules, audits, holdouts, and temporary designation.","evidence_reason":"The closed-year shadow tournament requires internal ledgers, source-data lineage, and sponsor information."},{"input_id":"E3::negative_space_design__philosophy","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"A protected silent-writing interval changes the seminar's facilitation and participation workflow.","evidence_reason":"The crossover requires live participants' argument formation, speaking patterns, and comfort reports."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__futurism_foresight::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Versioned expectations, structured residuals, reconstruction, and routing logic are the causal mechanism.","evidence_reason":"The authorized evaluation uses the network's historical scan corpus and internal review workflow."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__sociology_anthropology::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"An abstract permission-state interface and adapter conformance suite perform the intervention's causal work.","evidence_reason":"The prescribed tabletop uses synthetic records, independently implemented adapters, and black-box checks."}]}