{"classifications":[{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__environmental_climate::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is an abstract software-component contract and conformance oracle for snow-model implementations.","evidence_reason":"The next step uses an isolated benchmark, independently coded implementations, and technical conformance tests."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__accounting_auditing::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The causal mechanism is a versioned computational allocation contract governing calculation-engine behavior.","evidence_reason":"The evaluation requires a read-only adapter and a closed allocation period from internal accounting operations."},{"input_id":"E5::computability_boundary_mapping__film_media_production::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a formal equivalence gate, restricted language, and certificate-checking procedure.","evidence_reason":"The next step is an offline reduction review and synthetic graph-pair checker evaluation."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__sociology_anthropology::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The contract assigns authority, commitments, transitions, and coordination responsibilities among member groups.","evidence_reason":"The tabletop requires authorized representatives to enact and assess institutional coordination scenarios."},{"input_id":"E4::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__education_pedagogy::PROPOSAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention governs artifact ownership, review, retention, disposition, and restoration workflows.","evidence_reason":"The read-only pilot depends on a specific course's internal artifacts, histories, and instructor confirmation."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__environmental_climate::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention structures eligibility, allocation, bidding, oversight, appeals, and ecological protections.","evidence_reason":"Its shadow exercise requires institutional participants to submit and assess voluntary bids under the proposed rules."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__rhetoric::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a moderator protocol that governs speaking, silence, and response capture.","evidence_reason":"The decisive feasibility check uses live volunteer sessions and participant-facing measures."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__rhetoric::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention principally changes the presentation interface's annotation state and reveal logic.","evidence_reason":"The proposed evaluation relies on consenting readers' first-pass responses and accessibility reports."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__nanotechnology::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention defines computational geometry behavior and backend conformance independently of storage format.","evidence_reason":"The next step is an isolated harness using toy backends, fixtures, and technical property tests."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__futurism_foresight::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The reusable rehearsal bed coordinates roles, scenario admission, logging, stewardship, and reset procedures.","evidence_reason":"The comparison requires facilitators and participants to conduct bounded scenario rehearsals."},{"input_id":"E3::negative_space_design__behavioral_economics","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposed protected interval changes the choice interface's information timing and capture sequence.","evidence_reason":"The next test requires consented participants making simulated choices and reporting comprehension."},{"input_id":"E3::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__marine_science","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The approach governs data-version lifecycle states, holds, review, archive, and restoration practices.","evidence_reason":"The pilot depends on a completed observatory year's internal versions, dependencies, and archive records."},{"input_id":"E5::invariant_mode_decomposition_design__art_aesthetics::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The central mechanism estimates a deliberation update model and uses its modes to trigger a process cue.","evidence_reason":"The calibration requires a live committee's private scoring, discussion, rescoring, and evidence statements."},{"input_id":"E3::invariant_mode_decomposition_design__philosophy","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a fitted joint-revision model that supplies mode-guided review cues.","evidence_reason":"The proposed pilot evaluates reviewers and argument-revision cases through participant-facing review activity."},{"input_id":"E5::computability_boundary_mapping__human_computer_interaction::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a formal task-semantic contract, finite-state checker, and provenance classification system.","evidence_reason":"The next step is a fixed offline fixture evaluation with formal and accessibility technical review."},{"input_id":"E3::negative_space_design__futurism_foresight","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention governs facilitator input, a timed reflection interval, and the transition to discussion.","evidence_reason":"The next test compares workshop segments using participant interpretations, recall, and comfort reports."},{"input_id":"E5::invariant_mode_decomposition_design__information_theory::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention computes error-propagation modes and reallocates codec refresh information accordingly.","evidence_reason":"The authorized test is a deterministic codec replay with injected disturbances and held-out technical traces."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__aviation_aeronautics::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a recurring cross-organization enactment that assigns recognition, escalation, and follow-through responsibilities.","evidence_reason":"The next step uses participants from multiple ramp organizations in a tabletop and fictional rehearsal."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__criminology_forensic::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention standardizes governed verification, authority checks, certificates, and reset procedures for evidence disposition.","evidence_reason":"The shadow comparison relies on protected disposition records and internal authoritative-source workflows."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__environmental_climate::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The causal mechanism is a command-conditioned predictive model and residual-routing information pipeline.","evidence_reason":"The next step is a technical replay and shadow monitoring test using synchronized command, actuator, and sensor records."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__environmental_climate::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention defines a stateful evidence-ledger interface and computational conformance behavior independent of storage.","evidence_reason":"The test requires an authorized read-only copy of a completed project's monitoring records and workflows."},{"input_id":"E3::computability_boundary_mapping__history_historiography","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention enforces a finite rule fragment and applies an exhaustive computational checker.","evidence_reason":"The next step uses synthetic models, implementation tests, and proof review without production claims."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__film_media_production::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention governs a competitive assignment through common inputs, rules, review, safeguards, and appeals.","evidence_reason":"The dry run requires paid editors, reviewers, assistants, and safeguarding staff to enact the process."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__marine_science::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention governs the sequence of data presentation, silent interpretation, and group discussion.","evidence_reason":"The proposed comparison depends on multidisciplinary participants' notes, discussions, and accessibility reports."}]}