{"classifications":[{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__human_computer_interaction::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention chiefly creates consent, stewardship, review, and commitment procedures around digital-legacy actions.","evidence_reason":"Its authorized step requires a sandboxed cycle with living volunteers and legacy contacts."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__mathematics::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention organizes a governed social handoff, recognition, and record-correction workflow.","evidence_reason":"The pilot depends on participants and affected collaborators reporting understanding and completing assigned actions."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__aviation_aeronautics::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The causal intervention is a procurement and contestability regime governing supplier competition and migration obligations.","evidence_reason":"The decisive next step is an isolated bench plugfest using synthetic data and independent implementations."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__aviation_aeronautics::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"Matched predictors, residual encoding, reconstruction, and fallback logic perform the causal work.","evidence_reason":"The proposed test is a bounded technical replay with simulated link failures and performance measurements."},{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__cognitive_science::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"Lifecycle states, retention decisions, dependency gates, and steward review are the primary intervention.","evidence_reason":"The test requires a laboratory's maintained artifacts, ownership verification, and reconstruction dependencies."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__religious_studies_theology::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention defines a versioned permission-state contract and representation-independent operations.","evidence_reason":"A designated community stewardship body and its representatives must approve and assess the synthetic policy exercise."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__accounting_auditing::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"An abstract custody capsule, adapters, and black-box lifecycle oracle perform the intervention's work.","evidence_reason":"The next step is fabricated-data testing across an in-memory model and a non-production technical adapter."},{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__psychology::P5","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The board governs exception-layer authority, expiry, compilation, and archival decisions.","evidence_reason":"The decisive synthetic exercise randomly assigns trained human reviewers to perform administration and reconstruction tasks."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__criminology_forensic::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"A standing broker coordinates authorization, custodians, handoffs, and capacity without making scientific judgments.","evidence_reason":"The proposed crossover tabletop requires participating staff to route referrals through competing workflows."},{"input_id":"E4::computability_boundary_mapping__art_aesthetics::PROPOSAL_FIRST","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"Formal models, restricted grammars, verification procedures, and analysis routing are the intervention.","evidence_reason":"The next step requires technical model construction, exhaustive checking, and proof-obligation review on archived works."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__futurism_foresight::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"Versioned response prediction, residual encoding, reconstruction, and audit fallback are the causal mechanism.","evidence_reason":"The test requires a live crossover with expert participants entering and confirming judgments."},{"input_id":"E5::invariant_mode_decomposition_design__biology_ecology::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention principally uses an estimated transition model and modal analysis to select permitted control schedules.","evidence_reason":"Its decisive validation is a controlled growth-facility microcosm experiment with technical containment and measurements."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__environmental_climate::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The broker's reusable consent, coordination, assignment, and readiness process is the intervention.","evidence_reason":"The pilot depends on voluntary participants and repeated live coordination cases."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__mathematics::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"An opaque polynomial abstraction, implementation wrappers, and conformance laws define the intervention.","evidence_reason":"The next step uses isolated formal implementations, theorem re-establishment, and bounded differential checks."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__religious_studies_theology::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposed learner-state model, residual queue, reconstruction, and fallback logic perform the work.","evidence_reason":"The evaluation relies on de-identified but nonpublic student submissions and associated assessment records."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__accounting_auditing::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"A versioned transformation gateway and automated invariant checks convert eligible ledger exports into canonical populations.","evidence_reason":"The shadow replay requires secured access to completed source-period populations and their manual preparation records."},{"input_id":"E5::deadweight_loss_reduction__robotics_automation::P5","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a governed cross-site matching and review process for assets, needs, and transfer authority.","evidence_reason":"The next step uses internal asset, maintenance, ownership, and approved-demand records without a live transfer."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__human_computer_interaction::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The shared abstract session model, adapters, and conformance oracle are the causal intervention.","evidence_reason":"The authorized feasibility test uses synthetic data, sandboxed adapters, seeded violations, and technical trace checks."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__religious_studies_theology::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"A collection-scoped predictive model and residual-review interface carry out the intervention.","evidence_reason":"The test requires already authorized corpus records and reviewers working with their protected descriptive coding."},{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__physics::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The controller primarily governs configuration states, retention, dependency review, quarantine, and disposition.","evidence_reason":"The shadow test needs an ensemble's authoritative manifests, configurations, dependencies, and analyses."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__chemistry_materials::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a selective evidence-translation and cross-functional review workflow with steward rotation.","evidence_reason":"Its shadow probe requires closed internal substitution dossiers and internal functional-review records."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__mathematics::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The CompletionPackage abstraction, contract proofs, adapters, and coherence laws are computational-formal work.","evidence_reason":"The next step consists of isolated formal modules, theorem proofs, and coherence checks."},{"input_id":"E3::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__veterinary_medicine","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposed lifecycle labels, clinician adjudication, retention gates, and disposition paths are governance mechanisms.","evidence_reason":"The silent retrospective test requires closed clinic encounters and clinician review of protected records."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__futurism_foresight::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention creates a recurring governed observance for recognition, handoff, and renewal of watch responsibilities.","evidence_reason":"The pilot requires consenting contributors, safeguarding review, and live assessment of participation and stewardship effects."}]}