{"classifications":[{"input_id":"E4::computability_boundary_mapping__public_administration_policy::PROPOSAL_FIRST","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention principally defines and checks formal rule-language boundaries, abstractions, and guarantee-typed computational outputs.","evidence_reason":"Its authorized audit uses a frozen package, synthetic inputs, sandbox analysis, bounded enumeration, and technical review."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__religious_studies_theology::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The causal mechanism is an abstract software interface contract and conformance behavior independent of resolver representation.","evidence_reason":"The decisive pilot compares independent implementations with fixtures, leakage checks, and metamorphic relations."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__criminology_forensic::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a voluntary institutional ritual and follow-through workflow governing shared commitments and quality actions.","evidence_reason":"The pilot requires live participant responses, observation of consent and meaning, and completion of a quality action."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__futurism_foresight::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The reusable kernel performs structured validation, transformation, and workflow routing for signal dossiers.","evidence_reason":"Testing requires access to the utility's operational dossiers, analyst work, reviewer activity, and downstream workflow records."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__mathematics::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention allocates scarce verification capacity through a rulebook, scoring procedure, conduct limits, and appeals.","evidence_reason":"The shadow comparison depends on live reviewer panels applying competing procedures and auditors reproducing proof chains."},{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__physics::P5","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The causal work is performed by data-buffer lifecycle logic for pinning, eviction, sealing, and restoration states.","evidence_reason":"The authorized test is a controlled replay and simulated-capacity comparison with technical adjudication and restoration checks."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__mathematics::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a deterministic abstract proof-state contract with adapters and an exact checking kernel.","evidence_reason":"Its test requires independently implemented verifiers, seeded fixtures, differential comparison, and metamorphic checks."},{"input_id":"E4::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__logistics_supply_chain::RETRIEVAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposed change is an owner-renewal, dependency-gating, quarantine, and disposition workflow for overrides.","evidence_reason":"The next step relies on internal planning overrides, rationale records, commitments, and planner review."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__environmental_climate::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a governed assembly that structures voluntary recognition, obligation formation, and institutional follow-through.","evidence_reason":"The tabletop test evaluates participant experience, consent safety, and group-produced accounts and obligations."},{"input_id":"E5::invariant_mode_decomposition_design__biology_ecology::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The protocol's allocation decisions are driven by estimated transition modes, observability analysis, and computational gating rules.","evidence_reason":"The decisive pilot requires breeding-season field sampling, ecological observations, and held-out validation under live conditions."},{"input_id":"E3::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__chemistry_materials","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention governs sample inventory, validity review, tiering, quarantine, and disposition decisions.","evidence_reason":"The pilot must condition-check physical samples and assess laboratory storage and retrieval consequences."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__environmental_climate::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposal changes grant allocation through a frozen portfolio contest, conduct rules, safeguards, and review procedures.","evidence_reason":"The authorized shadow replay depends on nonpublic applications, evaluator records, and post-project observations."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__chemistry_materials::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"MIXED_OR_UNCLEAR","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a cross-laboratory governance ritual for disclosure, bounded commitments, and assigned corrective work.","evidence_reason":"The pilot jointly requires sealed technical comparison evidence and live participant-facing consent, meaning, and harm assessment."},{"input_id":"E4::negative_space_design__disaster_management::PROPOSAL_FIRST","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a temporary display-state and interface-logic change that controls what information appears on the primary surface.","evidence_reason":"Its feasibility test requires incident-management practitioners to use and interpret the prototypes in a tabletop session."},{"input_id":"E5::deadweight_loss_reduction__disaster_management::P5","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention changes facility access incentives through a governed time-window pricing and credit policy.","evidence_reason":"The authorized analysis requires internal facility arrivals, queues, service, capacity, and route records."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__religious_studies_theology::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention creates a community-controlled process for allocating scarce research access, setting caps, and enforcing conditions.","evidence_reason":"The authorized step is a closed-file audit requiring community-controlled records of projects, contacts, and access arrangements."},{"input_id":"E5::invariant_mode_decomposition_design__biology_ecology::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention uses transition-operator decomposition and modal gates to generate advisory breeding-plan preferences.","evidence_reason":"The next step depends on historical and current program breeding records and a non-operative internal shadow plan."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__film_media_production::P3","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposal is a production-governance observance that coordinates interpretation, dissent, ownership, and follow-through.","evidence_reason":"Evaluation requires live participation by creative and craft roles plus participant reports about pressure and exclusion."},{"input_id":"E5::invariant_mode_decomposition_design__information_theory::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention estimates a confusion operator and computationally redesigns tokens and confirmation checks around its modes.","evidence_reason":"It requires controlled transmission and relay trials with held-out technical performance measurements."},{"input_id":"E3::negative_space_design__nanotechnology","substrate":"PHYSICAL_MATERIAL","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention changes physical layout geometry by introducing rule-protected guard bands around critical structures.","evidence_reason":"The decisive test requires fabricated coupons, metrology, and electrical-function measurements."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__nanotechnology::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention allocates a scarce facility slot through common-condition rules, resource caps, scoring, audits, and appeals.","evidence_reason":"The shadow comparison relies on archived applications, facility attempt and burden records, and retained measurement records."},{"input_id":"E5::invariant_mode_decomposition_design__biology_ecology::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention uses a computational transition model and modal gate to select bounded nutrient and mixing settings.","evidence_reason":"The decisive test is a randomized, instrumented mesocosm experiment with controlled treatments and validation measurements."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__linguistics_semiotics::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a human interaction protocol governing turn timing, allowable prompts, passes, and clarification stages.","evidence_reason":"The comparison requires live consenting consultants, recorded elicitation sessions, and participant reports of pressure and clarity."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__astronomy_astrophysics::P1","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention changes telescope scheduling rules by reserving, activating, and restoring explicitly protected response windows.","evidence_reason":"The authorized replay requires detailed operational schedules, event updates, visibility constraints, and displacement records."}]}