{"classifications":[{"input_id":"E3::deadweight_loss_reduction__rhetoric","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention reallocates speaking time through forum rules, triggers, and moderation procedures.","evidence_reason":"Its decisive test is a live pilot involving speakers, moderators, and deliberative access outcomes."},{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__environmental_climate::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The causal mechanism is an edition lifecycle of ownership, review, supersession, retention, and restoration rules.","evidence_reason":"Testing requires managed catalog, dependency, archive, and service records held within the agency's operations."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__aviation_aeronautics::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"A forward model and residual-processing supervisor perform the proposed causal separation of commanded and unexplained signals.","evidence_reason":"The authorized test is bounded simulation and hardware-in-the-loop technical evaluation."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__nanotechnology::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The process-window compiler transforms eligible design information into proposed fabrication packages.","evidence_reason":"Decisive evaluation requires fabricated witness coupons and technical metrology."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__religious_studies_theology::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The curated proposition graph and query rules generate the reusable consequence-tracing pathway.","evidence_reason":"The test depends on consenting authors, reviewers, and specialist scholarly assessments."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__marine_science::P5","substrate":"PHYSICAL_MATERIAL","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The load-bearing intervention is physically preserved, untouched sample material available for later verification.","evidence_reason":"Testing requires controlled handling, preservation, custody, and retrieval of sample aliquots."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__astronomy_astrophysics::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention changes interface layer-rendering behavior around the candidate footprint.","evidence_reason":"Its decisive comparison relies on qualified reviewers' morphology judgments and errors."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__human_computer_interaction::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"An abstract software contract and resolver behavior govern concern binding across representations.","evidence_reason":"The authorized mutation suite is a controlled technical conformance test."},{"input_id":"E5::computability_boundary_mapping__human_computer_interaction::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention is a set of computational query contracts and algorithms with explicitly bounded semantics.","evidence_reason":"It is decided through fixed offline fixtures, reductions, and finite-algorithm checks."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__rhetoric::P2","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The template's protected field works through rules governing briefing content, timing, and participant option generation.","evidence_reason":"The next step tests participants' understanding and responses in a counterbalanced deliberative exercise."},{"input_id":"E5::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__cognitive_science::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The lifecycle harness chiefly governs ownership, review, renewal, quarantine, and retirement of model commitments.","evidence_reason":"The decisive step uses instrumented model traces, sandbox disabling, and benchmark replay."},{"input_id":"E6::catalytic_pathway_enablement__environmental_climate::P3","substrate":"PHYSICAL_MATERIAL","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"An immobilized methanotrophic biofilm cartridge physically performs the proposed methane-conversion pathway.","evidence_reason":"The test requires sealed flow experiments and inlet-to-outlet technical measurements."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__criminology_forensic::P3","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"A versioned predictor and structured residual layer allocate analytical-review attention.","evidence_reason":"The proposal is evaluated offline using controlled analytical batches and technical review comparisons."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__chemistry_materials::P2","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The residual model computationally corrects a lower-cost physical baseline using reference-query information.","evidence_reason":"The required evidence comes from controlled reference calculations, audits, and numerical consistency tests."},{"input_id":"E3::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__communication_media_studies","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"Editors apply lifecycle states, supersession notices, quarantine, and restoration procedures to publications.","evidence_reason":"The pilot requires a live editorial workflow and audience-facing currentness tasks."},{"input_id":"E6::representation_independent_interface_contract__mathematics::P4","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention defines a software sampler contract over an abstract probability distribution.","evidence_reason":"It is decided by exhaustive small-instance enumeration and implementation conformance checks."},{"input_id":"E5::negative_space_design__linguistics_semiotics::P5","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The protected gap is enforced by glossary authorization, publication, and reintroduction rules.","evidence_reason":"Testing depends on bilingual reviewers and intended users interpreting live glossary presentations."},{"input_id":"E6::bounded_rivalry_governance__religious_studies_theology::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The intervention allocates scarce preservation capacity through eligibility, bidding, auditing, and concentration rules.","evidence_reason":"Its retrospective test requires custodial project and realized-cost records not generally available publicly."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__criminology_forensic::P1","substrate":"COMPUTATIONAL_INFORMATION","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The residual-review layer computationally compares observed event bundles against a versioned expected background model.","evidence_reason":"The next step is an offline controlled examination using reusable images and seeded events."},{"input_id":"E6::predictive_residual_processing__sociology_anthropology::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The causal work is performed through council-authorized roles, escalation paths, coaching, and mentorship fallback.","evidence_reason":"The proposed evidence requires a consenting community rehearsal with apprentices and knowledge keepers."},{"input_id":"E5::invariant_mode_decomposition_design__literature_literary_theory::P3","substrate":"HYBRID_OTHER","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The proposal deliberately couples computational modal inference with a facilitator-led discussion reset.","evidence_reason":"Its evidence depends on consented seminar transcripts, coders, and student interpretation outcomes."},{"input_id":"E6::ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__environmental_climate::P4","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"FIELD_HUMAN_INSTITUTIONAL","substrate_reason":"The assembly works through structured collective declarations, dissent handling, and responsibility commitments.","evidence_reason":"The tabletop evaluation depends on cross-disciplinary participants interpreting and enacting the procedure."},{"input_id":"E3::invariant_mode_decomposition_design__engineering_design","substrate":"PHYSICAL_MATERIAL","evidence_dependency":"LAB_TECHNICAL","substrate_reason":"The intended causal change is a physical aeroelastic design modification that increases damping of a coupled mode.","evidence_reason":"Validation requires bounded ground-article or wind-tunnel measurements."},{"input_id":"E4::layer_decay_and_expiration_management__law_governance::PROPOSAL_FIRST","substrate":"GOVERNANCE_PROCESS","evidence_dependency":"PRIVATE_OPERATIONAL","substrate_reason":"The lifecycle register operates through authority assignments, review gates, dispositions, and preservation procedures.","evidence_reason":"The authorized test needs agency guidance, dependency, hold, and archive records under internal control."}]}