{"judgments":[{"pair_id":"E12MQ024","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":3},"winner":"A","reason":"A grounds contested binding authority in a genuine registry chokepoint and distinguishes emergency containment from sanction. B is strong but its representation and appeal structure is somewhat less natural for rapid service rollback."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ039","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":4,"testability":4,"practicality":5,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"A","reason":"Both fit mentor-anchored professional formation closely. A more sharply isolates the relational mechanism with an equal-time rotating-instructor comparator, novel mentor-absent transfer test, and explicit rival diagnoses."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ041","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":4,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"winner":"B","reason":"B uses real physical layer boundaries and explicit interlayer contracts, making local ownership and reintegration credible. A is carefully falsifiable but its masterbatch boundaries remain vulnerable to pervasive melt-phase coupling."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ020","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":4,"causal_coherence":4,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":4},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":3},"winner":"B","reason":"B maps synchronized release directly to gas-flux overload versus matrix relaxation and measures the proposed mediator cleanly. A is well specified, but cure exotherm may be governed more by downstream autocatalytic kinetics than capsule-release correlation."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ045","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":3,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":2},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":3},"winner":"B","reason":"B directly addresses strategic selection of materials-development evidence and aligns the gate with reproducibility through precommitment, random selection, and distributional scoring. A is excellent incentive design but is chiefly facility-allocation governance rather than a chemistry/materials hypothesis."},{"pair_id":"E12MQ036","scores_a":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":3,"contrivance_risk":3},"scores_b":{"structural_fidelity":5,"domain_fidelity":5,"causal_coherence":5,"operational_specificity":5,"testability":5,"practicality":4,"contrivance_risk":3},"winner":"B","reason":"Both are strong, falsifiable physical realizations. B has the more direct fit between staged capsule discharge and the matrix’s finite instantaneous cell-stabilization capacity; A adds a plausible but operationally demanding feedback-controlled cure schedule."}]}